OK. If you want to put the "trivial modifications" that are required so
the code is "on par with what we had usually committed as new
contributions" in the JIRA incident, I can try to address them this week as
well.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:33:25 +
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:33:25 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 20/10/2014 16:00, Hank Grabowski a écrit :
I have some time this week to try to get these changes made to the
interpolators. I don't want to do anything without consensus
however. So
to try to incorporate the discussion above plus a
Le 20/10/2014 16:00, Hank Grabowski a écrit :
> I have some time this week to try to get these changes made to the
> interpolators. I don't want to do anything without consensus however. So
> to try to incorporate the discussion above plus a concerned raised over the
> weekend on the JIRA thread
I have some time this week to try to get these changes made to the
interpolators. I don't want to do anything without consensus however. So
to try to incorporate the discussion above plus a concerned raised over the
weekend on the JIRA thread I propose:
1. Adding the original functionality back
On 10/17/2014 03:12 PM, sebb wrote:
On 17 October 2014 19:49, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
I'm following the discussion of how MATH-1138 was handled (Which I enjoy
reading because I'm very impressed with how eloquently everyone communicates
their points of view).
Just a warning that I might be ignor
Ah, that is a more complicated question. Those discussions definitely
aren't part of the repository. As someone now recently bitten by the
confusion in where discussions should be taking place, I agree there should
be a good documentation of those swim lanes. I'm new to contributing to
open sour
On 17 October 2014 21:16, Hank Grabowski wrote:
> The nice thing about Github, from my perspective as a person with only
> read-only access to the ASF repositories, is that it provides me with the
> ability to work in my own fork and then initiate pull requests that can be
> incorporated into the
The nice thing about Github, from my perspective as a person with only
read-only access to the ASF repositories, is that it provides me with the
ability to work in my own fork and then initiate pull requests that can be
incorporated into the root repository. I think it is still ideal that the
GitH
On 17 October 2014 19:49, Ole Ersoy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm following the discussion of how MATH-1138 was handled (Which I enjoy
> reading because I'm very impressed with how eloquently everyone communicates
> their points of view).
>
> Just a warning that I might be ignoring [2] (Stolen from Gilles)
I didn't want to address the situation in my original response since I was
on a smart phone, a bit torqued up by the original e-mail and I didn't want
to further agitate the situation by addressing the original
implementation. Since it seems that's all happened anyway, if you still
want my newbie
Hi all,
Le 17/10/2014 16:23, Gilles a écrit :
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:46:53 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Hi Hank,
>>
>> Le 16/10/2014 20:20, Hank Grabowski a écrit :
>>> OK. I submitted the pull request yesterday. I'm going to now remove
>>> the
>>> diff from JIRA.
>>>
>>> https://gi
Hi,
I'm following the discussion of how MATH-1138 was handled (Which I enjoy
reading because I'm very impressed with how eloquently everyone communicates
their points of view).
Just a warning that I might be ignoring [2] (Stolen from Gilles), because I
have suggested this before:
Lets calm down, guys. As Luc said, we are experimenting here,
getting the git workflow established. No one is trying to exclude
or discourage anyone. Hank or Luc, can you respond to Gilles'
questions about the commit? If not, it should be reverted, but
hopefully you can all three agree on a way
Gilles,
This is the original changes to get the bicubic spline working. These were
originally committed as a diff that was attached to the JIRA incident. The
suggestions in your email were in response to my questions about work
carrying forward from that point.
I have been very explicit and verb
Hi.
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:46:53 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi Hank,
Le 16/10/2014 20:20, Hank Grabowski a écrit :
OK. I submitted the pull request yesterday. I'm going to now
remove the
diff from JIRA.
https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/2
Thank you. I have merged this request
Thanks for the heads up. I had core.autocrlf set to true in my git global
settings but maybe GitHub's software wasn't honoring it without the
explicit gitattributes file, that I've now configured. We will see when I
do a pull request for some of those other features in the near future.
On Fri, O
Hi Hank,
Le 16/10/2014 20:20, Hank Grabowski a écrit :
> OK. I submitted the pull request yesterday. I'm going to now remove the
> diff from JIRA.
>
> https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/2
Thank you. I have merged this request and pushed the result to our main
repository. The only chan
OK. I submitted the pull request yesterday. I'm going to now remove the
diff from JIRA.
https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/2
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 9:36 AM, luc wrote:
> Le 2014-10-14 15:16, Hank Grabowski a écrit :
>
>> Should I try an experiment with that with those interpolator
Le 2014-10-14 15:16, Hank Grabowski a écrit :
Should I try an experiment with that with those interpolator changes I
put
the diff into JIRA for and remove that flle from the JIRA issue or is
the
process of using that diff already underway so it would create more
brain
daamge than it was worth?
Should I try an experiment with that with those interpolator changes I put
the diff into JIRA for and remove that flle from the JIRA issue or is the
process of using that diff already underway so it would create more brain
daamge than it was worth?
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 9:12 AM, luc wrote:
> H
Hi Hank,
Le 2014-10-14 15:01, Gilles a écrit :
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:36:07 -0400, Hank Grabowski wrote:
It seems that the GitHub repository is now staying in sync with the
ASF
repository. Is the preferred workflow going to be (or already is)
forking
inside of GitHub and then doing pull reque
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:36:07 -0400, Hank Grabowski wrote:
It seems that the GitHub repository is now staying in sync with the
ASF
repository. Is the preferred workflow going to be (or already is)
forking
inside of GitHub and then doing pull requests or will the workflow be
to
work directly wit
It seems that the GitHub repository is now staying in sync with the ASF
repository. Is the preferred workflow going to be (or already is) forking
inside of GitHub and then doing pull requests or will the workflow be to
work directly with ASF? For someone like me with only read only access to
the
23 matches
Mail list logo
