entually "beta" too).
>>>
>>> Is commons-numbers ready for a beta release as well?
>
> I think so (this should be discussed in another post).
>
> Regards,
> Gilles
>
>>>
>>> -Matt
>>>
>
kly jump
> > to 2.0 (if needed).
> >
> >> Note that "Numbers" should be released first (eventually "beta" too).
> >
> > Is commons-numbers ready for a beta release as well?
I think so (this should be discussed in another post).
Regards,
Gilles
>
t;Numbers" should be released first (eventually "beta" too).
>
> Is commons-numbers ready for a beta release as well?
>
> -Matt
>
> From: Gilles Sadowski
> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 12:11 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
that "Numbers" should be released first (eventually "beta" too).
Is commons-numbers ready for a beta release as well?
-Matt
From: Gilles Sadowski
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 12:11 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [geometry] Beta Re
Hello.
Le mar. 21 janv. 2020 à 14:41, Matt Juntunen
a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> I think that commons-geometry is ready for a beta release, as discussed
> previously. If there are no objections, how do we make that happen?
Note that "Numbers" should be released first (eventually "beta" too).
Best,
Hi.
Le mar. 21 janv. 2020 à 14:47, Rob Tompkins a écrit :
>
> I can try to help with that later this week potentially. My main question is:
> do we want to change the base package name across the component to
> `org.apache.commons.beta` for the beta release?
+1
Follow-up question: Do we agree
I can try to help with that later this week potentially. My main question is:
do we want to change the base package name across the component to
`org.apache.commons.beta` for the beta release?
-Rob
> On Jan 21, 2020, at 8:41 AM, Matt Juntunen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I think that commons-geomet
Hello,
I think that commons-geometry is ready for a beta release, as discussed
previously. If there are no objections, how do we make that happen?
Regards,
Matt J
