Hello. Le mar. 21 janv. 2020 à 18:28, Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > On Jan 21, 2020, at 12:24 PM, Matt Juntunen <matt.juntu...@hotmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> > >> Do we agree that compatibility can be broken > >> under package "org.apache.commons.beta"? > > My impression was that BC can be broken moving from beta to first major > release, regardless.
The question was about breaking compatibility in successive *beta* releases, i.e. no package name change between versions, say, "beta-0.1" and "beta-0.2". > But, changing the package name certainly makes the change contentious. I don't understand. > > -Rob > > > > > I believe so. If not, there wouldn't be much of a reason to do a beta > > version in the first place; we would just release 1.0 and then quickly jump > > to 2.0 (if needed). > > > >> Note that "Numbers" should be released first (eventually "beta" too). > > > > Is commons-numbers ready for a beta release as well? I think so (this should be discussed in another post). Regards, Gilles > > > > -Matt > > ________________________________ > > From: Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 12:11 PM > > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: [geometry] Beta Release > > > > Hello. > > > >> Le mar. 21 janv. 2020 à 14:41, Matt Juntunen > >> <matt.juntu...@hotmail.com> a écrit : > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I think that commons-geometry is ready for a beta release, as discussed > >> previously. If there are no objections, how do we make that happen? > > > > Note that "Numbers" should be released first (eventually "beta" too). > > > > Best, > > Gilles > > > >> > >> Regards, > >> Matt J > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
