> On Jan 21, 2020, at 12:24 PM, Matt Juntunen <matt.juntu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Do we agree that compatibility can be broken
>> under package "org.apache.commons.beta"?
My impression was that BC can be broken moving from beta to first major
release, regardless. But, changing the package name certainly makes the change
contentious.
-Rob
>
> I believe so. If not, there wouldn't be much of a reason to do a beta version
> in the first place; we would just release 1.0 and then quickly jump to 2.0
> (if needed).
>
>> Note that "Numbers" should be released first (eventually "beta" too).
>
> Is commons-numbers ready for a beta release as well?
>
> -Matt
> ________________________________
> From: Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 12:11 PM
> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [geometry] Beta Release
>
> Hello.
>
>> Le mar. 21 janv. 2020 à 14:41, Matt Juntunen
>> <matt.juntu...@hotmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I think that commons-geometry is ready for a beta release, as discussed
>> previously. If there are no objections, how do we make that happen?
>
> Note that "Numbers" should be released first (eventually "beta" too).
>
> Best,
> Gilles
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matt J
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
