Hi folks,
thanks for your help in promoting commons-exec - I would like to discuss
a few of the points mentioned in the emails
+) "how long is Siegfried sticking around" - well, I can't give you any
binding commitments and you don't expect one. I need a properly working
commons-exec for my c
On 1/3/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would hate to see it
> promoted and then it go inactive again shortly after. I know
> circumstances change and there are no binding commitments here - but
> stating an intention to stick around and look after it when proposing
> promotion w
--- Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm always interested, but it's always been
> somewhere down my list of
> priorities :(
>
I'm in a similar boat with Brett. I am fairly
familiar with the pre-fork version of this code and
would be available as a contingency resource if
nothing else
I'm always interested, but it's always been somewhere down my list of
priorities :(
If Siegfried is able to drive it to release quality, I can likely
start using it in a number of places which will increase my
involvement.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Brett
On 04/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Jan 3, 2008 9:00 AM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Exec would need to migrate to proper first.
> >>
> > According to the website moving to proper requires an "active group
> > of committers" - I hardly qualifiy for that so I'm sort of stuck
>
> That was my concern
>
> > Therefor
On 03.01.2008, at 11:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Selon Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Exec would need to migrate to proper first.
According to the website moving to proper requires an "active group
of committers" - I hardly qualifiy for that so I'm sort of stuck
That was my concern
Selon Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>> Exec would need to migrate to proper first.
> >>
> > According to the website moving to proper requires an "active group
> > of committers" - I hardly qualifiy for that so I'm sort of stuck
>
> That was my concern
>
> > Therefore I see two options
> >
Exec would need to migrate to proper first.
According to the website moving to proper requires an "active group
of committers" - I hardly qualifiy for that so I'm sort of stuck
That was my concern
Therefore I see two options
+) one existing committer teams up with me (preferred but rather
Hi Torsten,
see my comments below
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Torsten Curdt wrote:
On 02.01.2008, at 19:57, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
Hi folks,
I fixed a few things on commons-exec but I'm not sure how to proceed
from here since I'm the last/only man standing.
1) I nearly finished the open
On 02.01.2008, at 19:57, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
Hi folks,
I fixed a few things on commons-exec but I'm not sure how to proceed
from here since I'm the last/only man standing.
1) I nearly finished the open issue and need to do some field
testing -
and I would need some help on more exotic
Hi folks,
I fixed a few things on commons-exec but I'm not sure how to proceed
from here since I'm the last/only man standing.
1) I nearly finished the open issue and need to do some field testing -
and I would need some help on more exotic platforms ... :-)
2) if everything is okay I would lik
11 matches
Mail list logo
