Selon Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>> Exec would need to migrate to proper first. > >> > > According to the website moving to proper requires an "active group > > of committers" - I hardly qualifiy for that so I'm sort of stuck > > That was my concern > > > Therefore I see two options > > > > +) one existing committer teams up with me (preferred but rather > > unlikely looking at the recent activity) > > +) I leave commons-exec at it is in the sandbox and push out a > > SNAPSHOT release > > IMO a SNAPSHOT release is not really what we want. But I guess we (as > a community) need to discuss situations like these. The definition of > active committers is rather vague in this context. After all we have > quite some "one man shows" where other committers just help out. But > not releasing "exec" does not sounds like a better option either.
I don't think releasing a snapshot is a good idea. If we consider [exec] is ready for proper, it should really be migrated. I am interested in this component, I am a commiter for [math] and also a (very novice) PMC. I am willing to help. My available time is quite scarce, but I hope I will be able to do something. Luc > > Thoughts? > > cheers > -- > Torsten > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
