Hi folks,
thanks for your help in promoting commons-exec - I would like to discuss
a few of the points mentioned in the emails
+) "how long is Siegfried sticking around" - well, I can't give you any
binding commitments and you don't expect one. I need a properly working
commons-exec for my company, I was annoyed enough with the broken code
to sit down and it is actually small enough to cram the working hours
past midnight when my family is asleep ... :-)
+) as mentioned before the project should not be a "one man show" - with
your help it is not any longer. And looking how many projects are
handling external processes inproperly I see a lot of people in need of
a poperly working and maintained commons-exec
What I would like to do the next few weeks
+) clean up the remaining code
+) do field testing on Mac, Linux and Windows to ensure a certain quality
+) setup a WIKI page
+) write a tutorial
When all of these things are done we should have a look at the promotion
....
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 1/3/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip/>
I would hate to see it
promoted and then it go inactive again shortly after. I know
circumstances change and there are no binding commitments here - but
stating an intention to stick around and look after it when proposing
promotion would make me more likely to vote for it
<snap/>
That sums it up for me as well.
-Rahul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
