On 29/12/2008, at 1:08 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
In short:
1. New projects should use org.apache.commons
Yep, that's why I started commons-exec with o.a.commons as the group.
I think it would be best to use that given the opportunity since there
are no prior releases under commons-exec.
Ch
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> The "correct" groupId with respect to what Maven recommends should be
> org.apache.commons. However, if a groupId is changed and the package names
> are not changed at the same time it will cause nothing but grief for users
> of the project.
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> IMO ...
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
>> wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> after more than one week I have to announce that the vote DID NOT PASS ...
>>>
>>> +) two +1 votes (Jörg, Sebastian)
The "correct" groupId with respect to what Maven recommends should be
org.apache.commons. However, if a groupId is changed and the package
names are not changed at the same time it will cause nothing but grief
for users of the project. This is because to maven commons-
exec:commons-exec:1.
Hi folks,
can we get an agreement on that and put it into the wiki? If using
"org.apache.commons.*" makes life easier I'm happy to use it but we
should have a common understanding first ...
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
"As Thomas Hobbes observed in the 17th century, life under mob rule is
solita
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> IMO ...
>
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> after more than one week I have to announce that the vote DID NOT PASS ...
>>
>> +) two +1 votes (Jörg, Sebastian)
>> +) two positive comments (Rahul, Oliver) which formally do not
>
IMO ...
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> after more than one week I have to announce that the vote DID NOT PASS ...
>
> +) two +1 votes (Jörg, Sebastian)
> +) two positive comments (Rahul, Oliver) which formally do not
> constitute a +1
>
> Having said th
Hi folks,
after more than one week I have to announce that the vote DID NOT PASS ...
+) two +1 votes (Jörg, Sebastian)
+) two positive comments (Rahul, Oliver) which formally do not
constitute a +1
Having said that a couple of issues were raised ...
1) [major] what is the correct groupId - "org
