Re: [VOTE] Release Math 3.3 based on RC2

2014-05-02 Thread Phil Steitz
-0 for reasons Gilles cites. I would rather that we agree on how exactly to deal with the J8 mess before partially implementing "fixes." I am not -1 because formatting damage is minimal in what has been committed thus far [1]. Phil [1] This may seem like a nit; but there are quite a few places

Re: [VOTE] Release Math 3.3 based on RC2

2014-05-02 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: > Personally, I don't see a reason to revert the javadoc changes. There's no > turning back the clock on the javadoc processing engine -- it's not like 9 > or 10 is going to stop warning about malformed HTML. Although I am not a > Math contribu

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Math 3.3 based on RC2

2014-05-02 Thread Thomas Neidhart
The vote is cancelled. The changes to javadoc have been reverted in r1591835. Unfortunately, I will not be able to cut another RC, thus I step down as RM. Best regards, Thomas On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to call a vote to release Commons

Re: [VOTE] Release Math 3.3 based on RC2

2014-05-02 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 01/05/2014 18:15, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : > Hi all, > > I would like to call a vote to release Commons Math 3.3 based on RC2. > > Changes since RC1: > > * completed changelog > * fixed MATH-1110 > * added exclusion filter for findbugs false-positive > * disabled 2 tests that failed with

RE: [VOTE] Release Math 3.3 based on RC2

2014-05-01 Thread Patrick Meyer
+1 -Original Message- From: Thomas Neidhart [mailto:thomas.neidh...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 1, 2014 12:16 PM To: dev@commons.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Math 3.3 based on RC2 Hi all, I would like to call a vote to release Commons Math 3.3 based on RC2. Changes since RC1

Re: [VOTE] Release Math 3.3 based on RC2

2014-05-01 Thread Gilles
On Thu, 1 May 2014 16:10:09 -0500, Paul Benedict wrote: Personally, I don't see a reason to revert the javadoc changes. There's no turning back the clock on the javadoc processing engine -- it's not like 9 or 10 is going to stop warning about malformed HTML. Although I am not a Math contributor

Re: [VOTE] Release Math 3.3 based on RC2

2014-05-01 Thread Paul Benedict
Personally, I don't see a reason to revert the javadoc changes. There's no turning back the clock on the javadoc processing engine -- it's not like 9 or 10 is going to stop warning about malformed HTML. Although I am not a Math contributor/commiter, I support the change since going forward it will

Re: [VOTE] Release Math 3.3 based on RC2

2014-05-01 Thread Gilles
On Thu, 01 May 2014 18:15:39 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: Hi all, I would like to call a vote to release Commons Math 3.3 based on RC2. Changes since RC1: * completed changelog * fixed MATH-1110 * added exclusion filter for findbugs false-positive * disabled 2 tests that failed with Java

[VOTE] Release Math 3.3 based on RC2

2014-05-01 Thread Thomas Neidhart
Hi all, I would like to call a vote to release Commons Math 3.3 based on RC2. Changes since RC1: * completed changelog * fixed MATH-1110 * added exclusion filter for findbugs false-positive * disabled 2 tests that failed with Java 8 * javadoc fixes for Java 8 (incomplete, see below) Note: