-0 for reasons Gilles cites.  I would rather that we agree on how
exactly to deal with the J8 mess before partially implementing
"fixes."  I am not -1 because formatting damage is minimal in what
has been committed thus far [1].

Phil

[1] This may seem like a nit; but there are quite a few places where
<br/> is used to put formulas and other stuff inside paragraphs. 
There is just one of these in the code that has been changed for
Java 8 compat (CombinatoricsUtils) so far and it is not material.  
Ripping all of these out will damage readability of javadoc for some
of the classes yet untouched by these changes though.  Is <br> now
somehow legal?  Can we use that instead?  Or do we just have to
throw in the towel and write it all in <pre></pre> or TeX?

Phil

On 5/1/14, 9:15 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to call a vote to release Commons Math 3.3 based on RC2.
>
> Changes since RC1:
>
>  * completed changelog
>  * fixed MATH-1110
>  * added exclusion filter for findbugs false-positive
>  * disabled 2 tests that failed with Java 8
>  * javadoc fixes for Java 8 (incomplete, see below)
>
> Note:
>
> Commons Math 3.3 does compile with Java 8, but creating the site will
> not work due to some incompatibilities:
>
>  * javadoc: known doclint issue
>  * findbugs: not ready for java 8
>
>
>  Math 3.3 RC2 is available for review here:
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/math/
>     (svn revision 5215)
>
>  Maven artifacts are here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1026/org/apache/commons/commons-math3/3.3/
>
>  Details of changes since 3.2 are in the release notes:
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/math/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>     http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC2/changes-report.html
>
>  The tag is here:
>     https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_3_RC2
>     (svn revision 1591699)
>
>  Site:
>     http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC2/
>   (note the apidocs for the 3.3 release will be added with the release)
>
>  Clirr Report (compared to 3.2):
>     http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC2/clirr-report.html
>    (note that there are 4 false positives where the signature of a
> method has changed such that the parameter type is now the superclass of
> the previous type)
>
>  RAT Report:
>     http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC2/rat-report.html
>
>  Findbugs Report:
>     http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC2/findbugs.html
>
>   KEYS:
>   http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. after 1800
> GMT 04-May 2014.
>
>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to