On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote:
> Personally, I don't see a reason to revert the javadoc changes. There's no > turning back the clock on the javadoc processing engine -- it's not like 9 > or 10 is going to stop warning about malformed HTML. Although I am not a > Math contributor/commiter, I support the change since going forward it will > make the doc generation predictable. > +1 Gary > > > On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> > wrote: > > > On Thu, 01 May 2014 18:15:39 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I would like to call a vote to release Commons Math 3.3 based on RC2. > >> > >> Changes since RC1: > >> > >> * completed changelog > >> * fixed MATH-1110 > >> * added exclusion filter for findbugs false-positive > >> * disabled 2 tests that failed with Java 8 > >> * javadoc fixes for Java 8 (incomplete, see below) > >> > >> Note: > >> > >> Commons Math 3.3 does compile with Java 8, but creating the site will > >> not work due to some incompatibilities: > >> > >> * javadoc: known doclint issue > >> * findbugs: not ready for java 8 > >> > >> > >> Math 3.3 RC2 is available for review here: > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/math/ > >> (svn revision 5215) > >> > >> Maven artifacts are here: > >> > >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >> orgapachecommons-1026/org/apache/commons/commons-math3/3.3/ > >> > >> Details of changes since 3.2 are in the release notes: > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/math/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > >> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC2/ > >> changes-report.html > >> > >> The tag is here: > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/ > >> MATH_3_3_RC2 > >> (svn revision 1591699) > >> > >> Site: > >> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC2/ > >> (note the apidocs for the 3.3 release will be added with the release) > >> > >> Clirr Report (compared to 3.2): > >> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC2/ > >> clirr-report.html > >> (note that there are 4 false positives where the signature of a > >> method has changed such that the parameter type is now the superclass of > >> the previous type) > >> > >> RAT Report: > >> > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC2/rat-report.html > >> > >> Findbugs Report: > >> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC2/findbugs.html > >> > >> KEYS: > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS > >> > >> Please review the release candidate and vote. > >> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. after 1800 > >> GMT 04-May 2014. > >> > >> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > >> [ ] +0 OK, but... > >> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > >> [X] -1 I oppose this release because... > >> > > > > ... some commits were performed solely to support Java 8. Since it did > not > > suffice and the changes are not without drawbacks IMHO, I think that they > > should be reverted. > > > > Thanks for identifying the problem we'll encounter when transitioning to > > Java 8. > > I think that a discussion is required to consider the possible > workarounds. > > At this point, we should just advertize that CM is not source-compatible > > with Java 8, open an issue in order to collect all the related problems, > > and explore how to best solve them (by asking everyone's opinions). > > > > > > Sorry, > > Gilles > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Paul > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
