Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

--- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Hashes sigs look fine > >> > >> There is an extraneous 'options' file in the > apidocs > >> directory and the > >> javadoc

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hashes sigs look fine >> >> There is an extraneous 'options' file in the apidocs >> directory and the >> javadoc jar. >> > > Noted; will investigate. > >> The Manifest files in the so

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

--- Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Benson wrote: > > > > > --- Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [snip] > > >> > >> Wiki: > >> > >> - talks about release plan for 1.2 ;-) > >> > > > > mmm... Being that I'm already in the process of > > releasing 1.3, it seems

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

Matt Benson wrote: > > --- Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] >> >> Wiki: >> >> - talks about release plan for 1.2 ;-) >> > > mmm... Being that I'm already in the process of > releasing 1.3, it seems a little too late to come up > with a release plan. Should a release plan be

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

--- sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hashes sigs look fine > > There is an extraneous 'options' file in the apidocs > directory and the > javadoc jar. > This is caused by the javadoc plugin, apparently. The options file appears to be something that specifying true in the plugin's configurati

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

Officially cancelling this vote, blah blah... --- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks to anyone who reported/resolved issues with > the > previous release candidates. > > The artifacts are here: > http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc4/ > > The tag is here: > http://svn.ap

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

--- Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Builds from source and works fine on my compiler zoo > except for all > IBM-JDKs, but that's a different story > (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3580). > > Some minor issues though in the docs: > > - download page goes nowhere, I

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 17:04 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Matt Benson wrote: > > > > > --- Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Forgot to add the path for the POM, just in case you > >> will do another RC. > >> > > > > So... can you explain again what is the effect

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

Hi Matt, Matt Benson wrote: > > --- Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Forgot to add the path for the POM, just in case you >> will do another RC. >> > > So... can you explain again what is the effect of > moving [logging] to the separate dependencyManagement > section of the POM?

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

--- sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hashes sigs look fine > > There is an extraneous 'options' file in the apidocs > directory and the > javadoc jar. > Noted; will investigate. > The Manifest files in the source and javadoc jars > don't contain anything useful. > I expect this is a Maven fe

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

--- Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Forgot to add the path for the POM, just in case you > will do another RC. > So... can you explain again what is the effect of moving [logging] to the separate dependencyManagement section of the POM? Thanks, Matt > Jörg Schaible wrote: > > > Hi

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

On 05/07/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/5/08, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Issue in the POM: > > > > - it defines a property "commons.release.version" with value 1.2. This is > > used by the download-page-template.xml to generate the download

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

On 7/5/08, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Issue in the POM: > > - it defines a property "commons.release.version" with value 1.2. This is > used by the download-page-template.xml to generate the download page in > xdocs. Therefore currently all liks are generated for JXPath 1.2.

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

Forgot to add the path for the POM, just in case you will do another RC. Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Builds from source and works fine on my compiler zoo except for all > IBM-JDKs, but that's a different story > (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3580). > > Some minor issues though in

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

Hi Matt, Builds from source and works fine on my compiler zoo except for all IBM-JDKs, but that's a different story (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3580). Some minor issues though in the docs: - download page goes nowhere, I suspect this is caused by the current location and automatically f

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

Hashes sigs look fine There is an extraneous 'options' file in the apidocs directory and the javadoc jar. The Manifest files in the source and javadoc jars don't contain anything useful. I expect this is a Maven feature, but that does not mean that it is correct ;-) I think the manifests should c

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

Everything looks fine, but a mvn site:site fails for me with the error message "Embedded error: conf\findbugs-exclude-filter.xml (File cannot be found.)" This file seems to be missing in the source distribution (there is no conf directory at all). Oliver Matt Benson schrieb: Thanks to anyone

[VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

Thanks to anyone who reported/resolved issues with the previous release candidates. The artifacts are here: http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc4/ The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/jxpath/tags/JXPATH_1_3_RC4/ Site: http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.