Am Tue, 4 Feb 2014 22:55:57 + schrieb sebb :
> Is the multi-module VFS pom really needed?
I think the project could be restructured to produce the examples and
make the distribution in a single module. However I personally like the
separation, especially as there are so many dependencies invol
Hello,
Am Wed, 5 Feb 2014 09:55:18 + schrieb sebb :
> On 4 February 2014 20:25, Bernd Eckenfels
> wrote:
> > Am Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:10:35 +
> > schrieb sebb :
> >
> >> I have done some work on this.I can fix up the poms so that the
> >> Commons "release" profile works.
> >> And it looks l
On 4 February 2014 20:25, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Am Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:10:35 +
> schrieb sebb :
>
>> I have done some work on this.I can fix up the poms so that the
>> Commons "release" profile works.
>> And it looks like the distribution module is not really needed. The
>> assembly plugin
Is the multi-module VFS pom really needed?
Commons Parent seems to work fine with single module poms.
On 4 February 2014 22:48, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Am Tue, 04 Feb 2014 23:20:45 +0100
> schrieb Jörg Schaible :
>> > This is a good thing to have. What about OSGi bundle
>> > plugin? I am not su
Am Tue, 04 Feb 2014 23:20:45 +0100
schrieb Jörg Schaible :
> > This is a good thing to have. What about OSGi bundle
> > plugin? I am not sure if we need the pluginManagement
> > preconfiguration at all.
>
> Does it harm?
At least I dont get it to work in the VFS POM. A Stand-alone POM with a
test
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Am Tue, 04 Feb 2014 21:53:24 +0100
> schrieb Jörg Schaible :
>
>> We could move the compiler and jar plugin into an own profile of the
>> parent, that is automatically activated if src/main/java exists.
>> That, however, enforces Maven 3 and standard layout for all Java
>
Am Tue, 04 Feb 2014 21:53:24 +0100
schrieb Jörg Schaible :
> We could move the compiler and jar plugin into an own profile of the
> parent, that is automatically activated if src/main/java exists.
> That, however, enforces Maven 3 and standard layout for all Java
> projects.
Yes, I thought about
Hi Bernd,
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Am Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:10:35 +
> schrieb sebb :
>
>> I have done some work on this.I can fix up the poms so that the
>> Commons "release" profile works.
>> And it looks like the distribution module is not really needed. The
>> assembly plugin can be run fro
Am Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:10:35 +
schrieb sebb :
> I have done some work on this.I can fix up the poms so that the
> Commons "release" profile works.
> And it looks like the distribution module is not really needed. The
> assembly plugin can be run from the top level pom.
(sorry for picking this
On 21 January 2014 16:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:10 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 21 January 2014 03:21, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Gary Gregory > >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Sebb,
>> >>
>> >> Please modify the POMs and whatever else as you see fit.
>> >
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:10 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 21 January 2014 03:21, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Gary Gregory >wrote:
> >
> >> Sebb,
> >>
> >> Please modify the POMs and whatever else as you see fit.
> >>
> >> It sure would be nice to release 2.1.
> >>
> >
> >
On 21 January 2014 03:21, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> Sebb,
>>
>> Please modify the POMs and whatever else as you see fit.
>>
>> It sure would be nice to release 2.1.
>>
>
> Sebb,
>
> When do you think you'll be able to put time in? The multi-mod
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Sebb,
>
> Please modify the POMs and whatever else as you see fit.
>
> It sure would be nice to release 2.1.
>
Sebb,
When do you think you'll be able to put time in? The multi-module stuff is
daunting. I just RM'd a release of HttpCommons Ht
Sebb,
Please modify the POMs and whatever else as you see fit.
It sure would be nice to release 2.1.
Gary
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:22 PM, sebb wrote:
> At present, the VFS poms use the "apache-release" profile from the
> Apache pom, and override some bits of it that don't suit Commons.
>
>
At present, the VFS poms use the "apache-release" profile from the
Apache pom, and override some bits of it that don't suit Commons.
However, this is also done by the Commons parent pom which provides
its own "release" profile.
This is not ideal as VFS uses a different process for releasing code
15 matches
Mail list logo
