On 4 February 2014 20:25, Bernd Eckenfels <e...@zusammenkunft.net> wrote:
> Am Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:10:35 +0000
> schrieb sebb <seb...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I have done some work on this.I can fix up the poms so that the
>> Commons "release" profile works.
>> And it looks like the distribution module is not really needed. The
>> assembly plugin can be run from the top level pom.
>
> (sorry for picking this mail for quote, I wanted to stay within a
> thread but it is not a specific answer to sebb)
>
>  The current state looks pretty messed up. I have been trying to
> debug some strange bundle-plugin behaviour but I could not really with
> that complicated commons parent.
>
> This parent is not really suited for multi-module builds and even if it
> was it still does quite a few things too much IMHO.

Which things are excessive?
The intention was to use the pom for common items, and allow it to be
configured (with properties)/overridden by the component poms if
necessary.
But needing to override should be rare.

> Would it be
> possible to have a "policy commons" parent and a derieved parent which
> also adds "build convinience"?
>
> Currently the VFS project POM is building (unwanted and empty) JAR
> files.

What command are you using, and what are these jar files?

> Gruss
> Bernd
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to