Re: [Math] Towards 4.0

2022-12-12 Thread Alex Herbert
I think a beta would be good. Ideally we would get some feedback from those migrating from CM3 to CM4 and there could be a chance to adjust the API. Alex On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 at 15:22, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I'd be happy with at least one beta release. > > Gary > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022, 10:03 Gi

Re: [Math] Towards 4.0

2022-12-12 Thread Gary Gregory
I'd be happy with at least one beta release. Gary On Mon, Dec 12, 2022, 10:03 Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Le lun. 12 déc. 2022 à 15:50, Gary Gregory a > écrit : > > > > I would say go for it is you are 100% certain that all public and > protected > > elements are the best they can be as a major r

Re: [Math] Towards 4.0

2022-12-12 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le lun. 12 déc. 2022 à 15:50, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > I would say go for it is you are 100% certain that all public and protected > elements are the best they can be as a major release is the only time we > can change them. 100% I'm sure it isn't. ;-) Much work remains in order to reach desira

Re: [Math] Towards 4.0

2022-12-12 Thread Gary Gregory
I would say go for it is you are 100% certain that all public and protected elements are the best they can be as a major release is the only time we can change them. Gary On Mon, Dec 12, 2022, 09:39 Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hello. > > With all its dependencies having been released, are there an

[Math] Towards 4.0

2022-12-12 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. With all its dependencies having been released, are there any objections (or concerns) wrt the release of the next major version of "Commons Math"? Regards, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.