I'd be happy with at least one beta release. Gary
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022, 10:03 Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote: > Le lun. 12 déc. 2022 à 15:50, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > > > I would say go for it is you are 100% certain that all public and > protected > > elements are the best they can be as a major release is the only time we > > can change them. > > 100% I'm sure it isn't. ;-) > Much work remains in order to reach desirable goals, API-wise, but it > should not hold much longer a release that would provide the many > improvements done over the years. > Anyways, the idea would be to release a "beta" version so that a mistake > such as you evoke (a "public" element that should be "private") could be > corrected. [Of course that does not hold for code in "legacy" packages > where by definition, work could not be completed to provide an improved > API; yet functionality equivalent to CM 3.6.1. should still be available > (for > people who'd rather not depend on both "3.6.1" and "4.0").] > > Gilles > > > > > Gary > > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022, 09:39 Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Hello. > > > > > > With all its dependencies having been released, are there any > > > objections (or concerns) wrt the release of the next major version > > > of "Commons Math"? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Gilles > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
