Le lun. 12 déc. 2022 à 15:50, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > I would say go for it is you are 100% certain that all public and protected > elements are the best they can be as a major release is the only time we > can change them.
100% I'm sure it isn't. ;-) Much work remains in order to reach desirable goals, API-wise, but it should not hold much longer a release that would provide the many improvements done over the years. Anyways, the idea would be to release a "beta" version so that a mistake such as you evoke (a "public" element that should be "private") could be corrected. [Of course that does not hold for code in "legacy" packages where by definition, work could not be completed to provide an improved API; yet functionality equivalent to CM 3.6.1. should still be available (for people who'd rather not depend on both "3.6.1" and "4.0").] Gilles > > Gary > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022, 09:39 Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > With all its dependencies having been released, are there any > > objections (or concerns) wrt the release of the next major version > > of "Commons Math"? > > > > Regards, > > Gilles > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
