On 08/27/2013 08:23 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Am 27.08.2013 15:57, schrieb Phil Steitz:
>> On 8/27/13 6:31 AM, James Carman wrote:
>>> It was mentioned the other day, so I thought I would propose a formal
>>> discussion. Is it time to let [math] "leave the nest"? I would doubt
>>> there are very
Don't you can conclude that matter, shut the f*** up, and enjoy the
last days of summer? ;)
---
TIA, Rodion
James Carman писал 29.08.2013 05:46 PM:
To be clear, I don't really care one way or the other. I just
thought
it was probably good to have a formal discussion on the matter. I'm
also
To be clear, I don't really care one way or the other. I just thought
it was probably good to have a formal discussion on the matter. I'm
also a math geek, so I like reading the emails sometimes (sometimes
they're way over my head too). It takes me back to my college days.
:) I would probably s
Hello.
James, it's good that you bring this up here. This is something I've
been
thinking about lately.
I agree that the mathematical knowledge that seems to be necessary to
dig
into [MATH] goes beyond what you learn in Computer Science courses at
university. I usually skip discussions abo
Hi,
James, it's good that you bring this up here. This is something I've been
thinking about lately.
I agree that the mathematical knowledge that seems to be necessary to dig
into [MATH] goes beyond what you learn in Computer Science courses at
university. I usually skip discussions about math bu
Le 27/08/2013 20:23, Oliver Heger a écrit :
> Am 27.08.2013 15:57, schrieb Phil Steitz:
>> On 8/27/13 6:31 AM, James Carman wrote:
>>> It was mentioned the other day, so I thought I would propose a formal
>>> discussion. Is it time to let [math] "leave the nest"? I would doubt
>>> there are very
Am 27.08.2013 15:57, schrieb Phil Steitz:
> On 8/27/13 6:31 AM, James Carman wrote:
>> It was mentioned the other day, so I thought I would propose a formal
>> discussion. Is it time to let [math] "leave the nest"? I would doubt
>> there are very many of us qualified to work on such a library her
On 8/27/13 6:31 AM, James Carman wrote:
> It was mentioned the other day, so I thought I would propose a formal
> discussion. Is it time to let [math] "leave the nest"? I would doubt
> there are very many of us qualified to work on such a library here in
> Commons. I have a degree in Mathematics
Hi All:
I'm only a casual [math] user (we use [math] at work for some *very* simple
things), but I hope that we, the wider [commons] community, has been
beneficial in sharing expertise in Java, design, and other non-mathematics
but programming related issues. That whole thread about exceptions a w
It was mentioned the other day, so I thought I would propose a formal
discussion. Is it time to let [math] "leave the nest"? I would doubt
there are very many of us qualified to work on such a library here in
Commons. I have a degree in Mathematics, but I haven't used the
advanced math in such a
10 matches
Mail list logo
