Le 27/08/2013 20:23, Oliver Heger a écrit :
> Am 27.08.2013 15:57, schrieb Phil Steitz:
>> On 8/27/13 6:31 AM, James Carman wrote:
>>> It was mentioned the other day, so I thought I would propose a formal
>>> discussion.  Is it time to let [math] "leave the nest"?  I would doubt
>>> there are very many of us qualified to work on such a library here in
>>> Commons.  I have a degree in Mathematics, but I haven't used the
>>> advanced math in such a long time that I probably wouldn't even really
>>> know where to start.  Would it be easier to build a larger community
>>> around a new TLP?  Would it be more visible that way, as opposed to
>>> being tucked away in our little neck of the woods?
>>
>> Here is just one HO:
>>
>> We get big benefit from contributions from non-mathematicians in
>> [math].  In fact, I suspect that most of the core developers are not
>> mathematicians by training.  Sure, we need mathematical knowledge to
>> develop algorithms, but there is a boatload of stuff that we get
>> valuable help from other commons community members on.
>>
>> I am not sure TLP would make much of a difference in terms of
>> "visibility" and I don't think we are not really hurting for that,
>> IMO.  What we need is what other commons components need - committed
>> committers.  We have found them here and I am sure we will continue
>> to find more.
>>
>> One final comment is that some of us also help on other components,
>> so [math] is itself a source of volunteers for commons.
>>
>> So my HO is both [math] and commons are better off staying
>> together.  I understand fully; however, if those not interested in
>> [math] feel differently and would rather see us move to TLP.
> 
> My HO is also that [math] should stay here in commons. There is indeed
> synergy.

+1


> 
> I use to skip the discussions requiring mathematical knowledge and
> background, but the ones related to design and programming issues are
> quite interesting.

I hope we do not bother people too much with these discussions ... :-(

Luc

> 
> Oliver
> 
>>
>> Phil
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to