Hi All: I'm only a casual [math] user (we use [math] at work for some *very* simple things), but I hope that we, the wider [commons] community, has been beneficial in sharing expertise in Java, design, and other non-mathematics but programming related issues. That whole thread about exceptions a while back for example.
I'm note sure what difference having one less dot in the domain would do for you. I can't see it changing how Google would answer queries differently. This would just be a marketing move IMO with a potential loss of shared expertise from [commons]. I won't stop it but I would think it sad to see it go ;) Gary On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 9:31 AM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: > It was mentioned the other day, so I thought I would propose a formal > discussion. Is it time to let [math] "leave the nest"? I would doubt > there are very many of us qualified to work on such a library here in > Commons. I have a degree in Mathematics, but I haven't used the > advanced math in such a long time that I probably wouldn't even really > know where to start. Would it be easier to build a larger community > around a new TLP? Would it be more visible that way, as opposed to > being tucked away in our little neck of the woods? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
