On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:29 AM, Peter Ansell
wrote:
> The only sticking point then and now IMO is the purely academic
> distinction of opening up internal labels for blank nodes versus not
> opening it up at all. Reto is against having the API allow access to
> the identifiers on academic groun
graph level is
naturally driven by the specs but as soon as systems issues get thrown
into the mix, the choice space is much larger.
Andy
Thanks!
Bruno
- Original Message -
From: Andy Seaborne
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2015 7:40 AM
Subject: Re
Le 19/01/2015 15:52, Andy Seaborne a écrit :
> It might work to seek tags like "apache/commons/rdf" but I feel that
> asking people to get sophisticated (specialised) for one particular
> community (we are all in many communities) is yet another barrier.
The commit mails for the Git repositories
On 18/01/15 12:07, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
...
To sum this up: All that is blocking github commons rdf to join Apache
Commons is the mailing list thing?
>
> Regards,
> Benedikt
Some thinking out loud ... in email ...
There are two mailing lists issues : "dev" and "commits".
"commits" has some
On 18 January 2015 at 12:07, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> There is a infra hook that can forward any comments on github issues to
> jira issues. I think this would be sufficient. Github mirrors are read
> only, so you will have to live with the manual merge approach...
Agreed - the infra-hook from gi
Hello Peter,
2015-01-16 1:29 GMT+01:00 Peter Ansell :
> The Clerezza team were all notified about the effort to put a common
> RDF API together on GitHub and they responded positively at that
> point. The only sticking point then and now IMO is the purely academic
> distinction of opening up inte
On Saturday, January 17, 2015, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>
>
> Just rdf@commons should do? Its both a topic and a component.
>
What about floor wax? Dessert topping?
On 15 Jan 2015 11:06, "Sergio Fernández" wrote:
> Therefore my proposal for Commons RDF is the following:
>
> * Commons RDF proposes an API that addresses portability issues. I'd
recommend to start form what we currently have at github which was actually
designed by committee and both Jena and Se
dy Seaborne
> To: dev@commons.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2015 7:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [ALL][RDF] github Commons RDF vs. Apache Commons Sandbox RDF
>
> On 15/01/15 11:52, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>>
>> I feel like I
On 15/01/15 11:52, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
Hello!
I feel like I can't help much in the current discussion. But just wanted to
chime in
and tell that I'm +1 for a [rdf] component in Apache Commons. As a commons
committer I'd
like to help.
I started watching the GitHub repository and have su
On 16/01/15 00:29, Peter Ansell wrote:
I hope there is no bad blood from the aborted effort last time. There
were a variety of causes, including the reasons above but we all
joined the GitHub discussion with the goal of hosting the project
inside of the Apache Foundation and IMO Apache Commons is
The Clerezza team were all notified about the effort to put a common
RDF API together on GitHub and they responded positively at that
point. The only sticking point then and now IMO is the purely academic
distinction of opening up internal labels for blank nodes versus not
opening it up at all. Ret
ers and data munging for Hadoop jobs) and that
would work
with different implementations.
Thanks!
Bruno
>
> From: Benedikt Ritter
>To: Commons Developers List
>Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 6:40 AM
>Subject: [ALL][RDF] github Commons RDF vs.
Hi Benedikt,
On 15/01/15 09:40, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
I just want to let you know, that I've joined the discussion, the github
commons rdf community is currently having at github [3]. I think it is time
for the PMC to take action here since it feels like there is a conflict in
the beginning.
Hi all,
I just want to let you know, that I've joined the discussion, the github
commons rdf community is currently having at github [3]. I think it is time
for the PMC to take action here since it feels like there is a conflict in
the beginning.
Hello Commons RDF community,
first of all, I'm sp
15 matches
Mail list logo
