It's a lot harder to do that now without seriously tarnishing your brand. M$
is doing some very good things - VSCode, RxJS ... Successful companies are
seeing the light and the ones that are not are very quickly forgotten about ...
On 11/14/18 12:33 PM, Eric Barnhill wrote:
It reminds me unco
That totally rocks!
Ole
On 11/14/18 9:50 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
One more option.
Which is good for the Java ecosystem.
LieGrue,
strub
Am 14.11.2018 um 15:14 schrieb Rob Tompkins :
Curious to see what people’s thoughts are to this:
https://aws.amazon.com/corretto/
-Rob
--
Are you using streams? A while back I experimented with matrix multiplication
using streams and they can be very slow:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35037893/java-8-stream-matrix-multiplication-10x-slower-than-for-loop
So I would think that Java has a lot of performance tuning and optimi
On 06/21/2016 08:07 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
Maybe. That could depend on whether there is anyone at Commons that would want
to participate in the component. Another option is to follow the pattern used
by httpclient. I believe they took
Hi Benedikt,
I think it would be better for the projects health if it uses github issues
only.
Cheers,
Ole
On 02/20/2016 05:15 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to discuss the next steps for moving the Chimera component to
Apache Commons. So far, none of the other PMC members has expr
On 02/13/2016 11:29 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:40:41 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
The project as a whole should probably begin to consider using
markdown documents / the github wiki / github pages as a replacement
for the documentation build step. More loosely coupled documentation
The project as a whole should probably begin to consider using markdown
documents / the github wiki / github pages as a replacement for the
documentation build step. More loosely coupled documentation is easier to
contribute to. Github markdown documents can be edited directly on github.
Mos
Both Phil and Gilles could have handled this more surgically from the start. A
great solution to this is easily within the emotional and technical ability of
both of them. To take the view that this is game over is non sense.
Ole
On 02/08/2016 06:45 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8
Hi Evan,
On 02/08/2016 08:10 AM, Evan Ward wrote:
Hi Ole,
On 02/05/2016 06:40 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 02/05/2016 04:42 PM, Evan Ward wrote:
Yes, I use it. In some cases it is useful to watch the RMS residuals
So if it were modularized and supported logging then this might
satisfy the same
The one thing that's really ticking me off is that I realize that Phil's grasp
of probability is a lot fresher than my own. Anyways don't worry about it. I
hope we can piece all of this back together, because I have a lot more stuff to
annoy some of you with.
Cheers,
Ole
On 02/06/2016 05:3
On 02/05/2016 04:42 PM, Evan Ward wrote:
Yes, I use it. In some cases it is useful to watch the RMS residuals
So if it were modularized and supported logging then this might satisfy the
same requirement?
, in
other cases to watch the change in the states. I think it is there from
an acknowle
Hi,
The LeastSquaresProblem supports dropping in a custom
ConvergenceChecker checker. Does anyone do this? Can you help me
better understand the value of it?
TIA,
Ole
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache
On 02/05/2016 04:52 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:56:20 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 02/04/2016 04:13 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:10:39 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone performed any benchmarking on lazy vs. unlazy
Evaluation(s)
Someone did:
https
Hi,
The LM optimize method counts evaluations. The below method also does. Just
wanted to check in to see whether it's still supposed to?
public static LeastSquaresProblem countEvaluations(final
LeastSquaresProblem problem,
final Inc
On 02/04/2016 04:13 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:10:39 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone performed any benchmarking on lazy vs. unlazy
Evaluation(s)
Someone did:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1128
or is there some obvious criteria on when to use one vs.
the
On 02/04/2016 04:30 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:08:30 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
I'm attempting to understand when and how I would want to use the
ParameterValidator WRT LevenbergMarquardt problem construction. Anyone
have any stories they can share?
It is possible tha
Hi,
I'm attempting to understand when and how I would want to use the
ParameterValidator WRT LevenbergMarquardt problem construction. Anyone have any
stories they can share?
TIA,
Ole
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...
Hi,
Has anyone performed any benchmarking on lazy vs. unlazy Evaluation(s) or is
there some obvious criteria on when to use one vs. the other? I only see
getResiduals() being called once in the optimize() method right after a new
evaluation is created:
current = problem.evalu
Apache Epsilon
On 02/01/2016 03:55 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
Apache Epsilon
On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:06 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to
respond. This POLL will be open for
math into modules, I encourage you to also
provide an all-in-one jar.
Gary
On Jan 25, 2016 4:22 PM, "Ole Ersoy" wrote:
Also if each module is very simple and isolated alphas, betas, etc. matter
less (If at all). Most devs releasing to npm rely on semver only.
Cheers,
Ole
On 01/25/201
Also if each module is very simple and isolated alphas, betas, etc. matter less
(If at all). Most devs releasing to npm rely on semver only.
Cheers,
Ole
On 01/25/2016 02:27 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Jan 25, 2016 10:11 AM, "Emmanuel Bourg" wrote:
Le 25/01/2016 18:52, Gilles a écrit :
AFAI
0 minutes. It's
very easy to integrate / extend this into any (CM or non CM) math project. So
if we create an organization structure targeting small simple modules I think
we will have a lot more fun with this.
Cheers,
Ole
On 01/25/2016 07:47 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 1/25/16 12:40 AM, Ole
I quite like Apache Epsilon as a non-descriptive but related name.
[ducks behind bikshed]
Benedikt
2016-01-25 8:40 GMT+01:00 Ole Ersoy :
Umbrella-ish is good. Linear algebra, genetic algorithms, neural
networks, clustering, monte carlo, simplex...These need an umbrella.
Some
of the other Apach
Umbrella-ish is good. Linear algebra, genetic algorithms, neural networks,
clustering, monte carlo, simplex...These need an umbrella. Some of the other
Apache projects that do math may be interested in moving that piece under the
Apache Math umbrella.
Personally I like to see each in a separ
I like Apache Math as well.
Cheers,
Ole
On 01/24/2016 04:18 PM, James Carman wrote:
I'm okay with that too. Apache Math
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:17 PM Gilles wrote:
Just plain and simple "Apache Math" maybe?
Or is it taken already?
Gilles
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:46:17 -0700, Phil Steitz w
Never mind on the below - I was thinking scalar operations ...
Cheers,
Ole
On 01/20/2016 04:53 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
The RealMatrix.power(p)
(http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-math/apidocs/org/apache/commons/math3/linear/RealMatrix.html#power%28int%29)
says that it will throw a
Hi,
The RealMatrix.power(p)
(http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-math/apidocs/org/apache/commons/math3/linear/RealMatrix.html#power%28int%29)
says that it will throw a NON_SQUARE_MATRIX_EXCEPTION. Is this correct?
Cheers,
Ole
-math
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang
Gary
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
I love the idea. I also think commons will get a lot more eye balls if it
gets all the repositories on github and enables the watch button as well as
github issues.
Cheers,
Ole
On 01/13/2016 07
I love the idea. I also think commons will get a lot more eye balls if it gets
all the repositories on github and enables the watch button as well as github
issues.
Cheers,
Ole
On 01/13/2016 07:24 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
I like having [math] in Commons. There are other multi-module projects
is zero, but in the first case, is it?
To be on the safe side, it should be an error, but I've just had
to let this kind of condition pass (cf. MATH-1300 and related on
the implemenation of "nextBytes(byte[],int,int)" feature).
On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 18:41:27 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
publi
ries. In the latter case,
according to the formula, the norm is zero, but in the first case, is it?
On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 18:41:27 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
public double getLInfNorm() {
double norm = 0;
Iterator it = iterator();
while (it.hasNext()) {
fin
public double getLInfNorm() {
double norm = 0;
Iterator it = iterator();
while (it.hasNext()) {
final Entry e = it.next();
norm = FastMath.max(norm, FastMath.abs(e.getValue()));
}
return norm;
}
Cheers,
Ole
--
enough for just about everything...I think...famous
last words .
Cheers,
Ole
On 01/05/2016 10:35 AM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
I'm attempting a more minimalistic array vector design and just thought I'd
float a partial API to see what you think. The below methods are both
'mapToSelf&#
Hi,
I'm attempting a more minimalistic array vector design and just thought I'd
float a partial API to see what you think. The below methods are both
'mapToSelf' by default. If the user wants a new vector, she should first clone
the vector and then call the map method (vector.clone().map(...
On 01/03/2016 08:41 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 19:41:46 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
RealVector supports the following type of fluid API:
|RealVectorresult
=v.mapAddToSelf(3.4).mapToSelf(newTan()).mapToSelf(newPower(2.3));
IIUC each time we call v.mapXXX an iteration happens, so
Hi,
RealVector supports the following type of fluid API:
|RealVectorresult
=v.mapAddToSelf(3.4).mapToSelf(newTan()).mapToSelf(newPower(2.3)); IIUC each time
we call v.mapXXX an iteration happens, so with the above expression we loop 3
times. With Java 8 Arrays.setAll we can do the same thing
[...]
I am curious to see how this compares to simple for-loops which I can
imagine help the JIT compiler to do loop unrolling and to make use of
instruction-level parallelism.
Otmar,
Just read another article that evaluated some of Angelika Langers results.
http://blog.codefx.org/java/stream-p
On 01/03/2016 02:06 AM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
Am 03.01.2016 7:49 vorm. schrieb "Ole Ersoy" :
Hi,
I ran another test using a single parallel loop for array based matrix
vector multiplication. Throughput almost tripled (Test pasted at bottom):
# Run complete. Total time: 00:13:24
Hi,
I ran another test using a single parallel loop for array based matrix vector
multiplication. Throughput almost tripled (Test pasted at bottom):
# Run complete. Total time: 00:13:24
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
MultiplyBenchmark.parallelMulti
Hi Otmar,
On 01/02/2016 10:33 AM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 4:38 AM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
Hope ya'll are having an awesome new year!
Some matrix operations, like createRealIdentityMatrix can be turned into one
liners like this:
IntStream.range(0, dimension).forE
On 01/02/2016 04:12 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 00:50:18 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
I think RealVector.cosine() is missing the checkVectorDimensions(v) check?
"checkVectorDimensions" is called by "dotProduct".
Oh good...at least one of us knows how t
I think RealVector.cosine() is missing the checkVectorDimensions(v) check?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Hi,
I created a pull request for the below for having the below added to
RealMatrix.setSubmatrix():
* @throws MathIllegalStateException
if {@code data} is null, but row or column are greater than
zero.
I updated the corresponding throws declarations on RealMatrix and
Hi,
Hope ya'll are having an awesome new year!
Some matrix operations, like createRealIdentityMatrix can be turned into one
liners like this:
IntStream.range(0, dimension).forEach(i -> m.setEntry(i, i, 1.0));
And can be performed in parallel like this:
IntStream.range(0, dimens
On 12/31/2015 05:42 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:54:00 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 12/31/2015 11:10 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:33:56 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
In RealMatrixFormat.parse() MatrixUtils makes the decision on what
type of RealMatrix instance to return
On 12/31/2015 11:10 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:33:56 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
In RealMatrixFormat.parse() MatrixUtils makes the decision on what
type of RealMatrix instance to return.
Ideally, this is correct as the actual type is an "implementation detail".
F
On 12/31/2015 03:33 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 31/12/2015 04:33, Ole Ersoy a écrit :
[...]
Of course, using this feature is rather expert use. Typically, it is
done when some algorithm creates the data array by itself, and then
wants to return it as a matrix, but will not use the array by
Hi,
This is a getter from RealMatrixFormat:
/**
* Get the format prefix.
*
* @return format prefix.
*/
public String getRowPrefix() {
return rowPrefix;
}
Within RealMatrixFormat the properties include prefix and rowPrefix. Both have
the same documentati
Hi,
In RealMatrixFormat.parse() MatrixUtils makes the decision on what type of
RealMatrix instance to return. Flexibility is gained if it just returns
double[][] letting the caller decide what type of RealMatrix instance to
create. It's also better for modularity, as is reduces RealMatrixFor
On 12/30/2015 03:28 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 30/12/2015 20:18, Ole Ersoy a écrit :
Hi Luc,
On 12/30/2015 03:55 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 30/12/2015 06:18, Ole Ersoy a écrit :
Hi,
Hi Ole,
RealMatrixPreservingVisitor and RealMatrixChangingVisitor files look
identical with the
Hi Luc,
On 12/30/2015 03:55 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 30/12/2015 06:18, Ole Ersoy a écrit :
Hi,
Hi Ole,
RealMatrixPreservingVisitor and RealMatrixChangingVisitor files look
identical with the exception of a single @see Default... annotation
(Which I think is redundant...same as >
Hi,
RealMatrixPreservingVisitor and RealMatrixChangingVisitor files look identical
with the exception of a single @see Default... annotation (Which I think is
redundant...same as > All known implementing classes...?). Would it make sense
to remove the annotation and have one RealMatrixChangin
Hi,
Just thought I'd share a concrete callback interface that I think this may work
well for optimizers in general, even though I'm just working on Levenberg
Marquardt ATM. The interface is pasted below, but roughly here's how it works.
//Create an instance of an observer implementation.
Opti
On 12/26/2015 05:22 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 16:21:04 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
What do you think of removing iterator(), Entry, and Iterator() from
RealVector? ArrayRealVector can replace these with Vector...I
think...Still need to attempt it. Vector is synchronized so it
Hi,
What do you think of removing iterator(), Entry, and Iterator() from
RealVector? ArrayRealVector can replace these with Vector...I think...Still
need to attempt it. Vector is synchronized so it makes it easier to make
ArrayRealVector thread safe.
Cheers,
Ole
--
On 12/26/2015 02:41 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/26/15 11:12 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 10:21:30 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
In RealVector there is an isInfinite() method that checks for
isInfinite() and isNan() at the same time. If any coordinate is
infinite, it will return true
On 12/26/2015 12:12 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 10:21:30 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
In RealVector there is an isInfinite() method that checks for
isInfinite() and isNan() at the same time. If any coordinate is
infinite, it will return true...unless a value is Nan...then it will
return
In RealVector there is an isInfinite() method that checks for isInfinite() and
isNan() at the same time. If any coordinate is infinite, it will return
true...unless a value is Nan...then it will return false. I'm probably missing
something...but it seems like isInfinite() should return true i
Actually - I the Factory is used, then the key signature should determine if
it's an MDME or DME. So if 4 keys are used row, column, row, column then MDME
otherwise DME...Sound good?
Ole
On 12/24/2015 06:12 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
So if IUC whenever we are dealing with matrices, a MDME s
So if IUC whenever we are dealing with matrices, a MDME should be thrown? So
in this needs an update?:
https://github.com/apache/commons-math/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math4/linear/RealMatrix.java#L95
Ole
-
Hi Gilles,
It sounds like we're starting to coalesce on this. Hopefully this is not going
to come as too much of a shock :). [1] The exception patch will permeate
every class that throws an exception. We will have to delete all the other
exception and replace them with MathException. Here
Hola,
I started working on my LevenbergMarquardt optimizer experiment, and figured
I'd share the Lombok generated immutable configuration class that I split off
from the optimizer. This is only for show...Not trying to restart the lombok
inclusion in CM discussion.
https://github.com/firefly
A few drawbacks to having IAE thrown by CM is that it complicates and blurres
things for those designing a handler that catches all CM exceptions. CM
advertising a factory that throws each exception 'type' under globally unique
conditions minimizes root cause analysis time and indirection.
Th
[...]
On 12/23/2015 03:38 AM, luc wrote:
interface ExceptionLocalizer {
/** Localize an exception message.
* @param locale locale to use
* @param me exception to localize
* @return localized message for the exception
*/
String localize(Locale locale, MathExcept
[...]
Looks good. Where is the code? ;-)
So CM clients would:
catch(MathException e) {
String exceptionTemplate = ResourceBundle.getBundle("cm.exception.templates", new
Locale("en", "US")).getString(e.getType());
String i18Nmessage = buildMessage(exceptionTemplate, e.getContext());
On 12/22/2015 11:46 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 22:44:16 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 12/21/2015 06:44 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 12:14:16 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
I was considering jumping into the JDKRandomGenerator exception
discussion, but I did not want to
.
One of the point in having exceptions that extends our own root
exception is that users at higher level can catch this top level.
Currently, we don't even advertise properly what we throw. We even
miss to forward upward some exceptions thrown at low level in the
javadoc/signature of out upper
On 12/21/2015 06:44 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 12:14:16 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
I was considering jumping into the JDKRandomGenerator exception
discussion, but I did not want to hijack it.
Not sure if any of you have had a chance to looks at this:
https://github.com/firefly
On 12/21/2015 01:45 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/21/15 12:26 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Should look like this, with some typos fixed:
/**
...
* @throws MatrixDimensionMismatchException if the dimensions of
* {@code destination} do not match those of {@code this}.
* @throws
Should look like this, with some typos fixed:
/**
...
* @throws MatrixDimensionMismatchException if the dimensions of
* {@code destination} do not match those of {@code this}.
* @throws NumberIsTooSmallException if {@code endRow < startRow} or
* {@code endColumn < startCo
Hi,
I was considering jumping into the JDKRandomGenerator exception discussion, but
I did not want to hijack it.
Not sure if any of you have had a chance to looks at this:
https://github.com/firefly-math/firefly-math-exceptions/
https://github.com/firefly-math/firefly-math-exceptions/blob/maste
In the process of making the firefly modules available for automatic install
via maven I came across this:
https://jitpack.io/
Thought it might help ease publishing of test artifacts for math.
Cheers,
- Ole
-
To unsubscribe, e
Hi,
I just published an arithmetic module / ArithmeticUtils repackaged. I would
love to get some feedback on what you think of the exception design...any
improvements...Do you think it could work for CM in general, etc? The
exception design strips localization, but it should be very easy to r
The (This is nit picky) ArithmeticUtils subAndCheck uses a message template
that is meant for addition. Should it catch and rethrow the exception with a
subtraction template? This is how the exception is thrown (Line 470):
https://github.com/apache/commons-math/blob/master/src/main/java/org/ap
On 12/18/2015 04:07 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/18/15 2:59 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
I think it makes sense. If the destination array is too small,
throw an IAE.
Right. That is what the implementations do - it is just a
specialized IAE. We decided a while back not to throw "raw"
I think it makes sense. If the destination array is too small, throw an IAE.
Perhaps the implementations need to be updated. I'm attempting to modularize
the linear package ATM so I'll have a closer look.
Cheers,
- Ole
On 12/18/2015 01:31 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
It does not look to me like
Actually I think I see why bubbling exceptions is better than performing
boolean checks...so just ignore, unless there is some merit to it...
Cheers,
Ole
On 12/16/2015 01:08 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on making the linear package standalone. The methods that perform
precond
Hi,
I'm working on making the linear package standalone. The methods that perform
precondition checks for matrix operations throw exceptions (See below). An
option would be return a boolean instead. Obviously I would love it if CM
adopts the code at some point, so I want to check whether ch
Hi Thomas,
On 12/14/2015 06:37 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
Just a heads up for those of you interested or have nothing better to do
at 2 am :). I refactored the Precision class into classes PrecisionAssert
and RoundDouble.
https
Hi,
Just a heads up for those of you interested or have nothing better to do at 2
am :). I refactored the Precision class into classes PrecisionAssert and
RoundDouble.
https://github.com/firefly-numbers/firefly-numbers
I created a new github organization for the package, since it deals less
Hi,
In Precision there are these two methods:
[1] public static double round(double x, int scale, int roundingMethod)
[2] public static float round(float x, int scale, int roundingMethod)
The implementations for each are different. For [2] could users just convert
float to double and use [1]
Hi,
I'm creating a new utilities module and I'm trying to decide whether to keep
the below code block (Contained in the Precision.roundUnscaled() method - BTW
it contains a new exception type I'm playing with - see
https://github.com/firefly-math/firefly-math-exceptions if interested - the
ut
Notes inline...
On 11/24/2015 08:28 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 06:52:04 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
I need the following methods to complete the fix for MATH-1246. I
can add them as private methods to the KS class; but they seem
generally useful, so I propose adding them to MathArrays
On 11/13/2015 08:12 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 10:34:43 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
If I'm interested in some functionality that is 'beta' then I first
have to realize that it's 'beta'...Maybe just tag the branch beta.
After that there's probably
On 11/07/2015 04:00 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:06:35 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
If math is broken up into smaller artifacts it will make it easier
for users to upgrade, even if it it breaks compatibility, as well as
speed up the release frequency. So for example:
commons-math
If I'm interested in some functionality that is 'beta' then I first have to
realize that it's 'beta'...Maybe just tag the branch beta. After that there's
probably (Judging from the number of people communicating here) 1/2 people
interested. Isn't it easier for them to just just check out the b
If math is broken up into smaller artifacts it will make it easier for users to
upgrade, even if it it breaks compatibility, as well as speed up the release
frequency. So for example:
commons-math-optimization (Or even more granular commons-math-optimization-lp,
commons-math-optimization-ga, c
Hi,
On 09/30/2015 01:44 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Hi, Norman,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:06 PM, wrote:
My colleague Jeff Rothenberg and I, retirees, have developed an alternative to
using regular expressions for searching for (and optionally replacing)
patterns in text.
Something that is
would still future proof by wrapping the solution in a Docker container when
possible.
Cheers,
- Ole
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 09/25/2015 12:55 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 09/25/2015 05:04 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On 09/25/2015 08:45 AM, Thomas
On 09/25/2015 03:06 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 9/25/15 11:01 AM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 09/25/2015 11:34 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
I disagree. Good tests, API contracts, exception management and
documentation can and should eliminate the need for cluttering
low-level library code with debug
On 09/25/2015 12:55 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 09/25/2015 05:04 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On 09/25/2015 08:45 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi Ole,
can you explain why you think that the addition of lombok brings any
benefit to our users?
Sure - I'm looking a
retty sure we have all been here.
Cheers,
- Ole
Gilles
[1] No quality or complexity judgment implied.
Phil
Gilles
Thomas
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Ole Ersoy
wrote:
Hello,
We have been discussing various ways to view what's happening
internally
with algorithms, and the t
the result usually was: do not add logging
I think for the reason that commons should not introduce transitive
dependencies? This has been solved fairly well (Below).
Cheers,
- Ole
Thomas
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hello,
We have been discussing various ways to v
Hi Thomas,
On 09/25/2015 08:45 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi Ole,
can you explain why you think that the addition of lombok brings any
benefit to our users?
Sure - I'm looking at the LevenbergMarquardtOptimizer ATM, and it has the
following set of parameters:
/* configuration parameters
On 09/25/2015 06:55 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:41:10 -0500, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 09/24/2015 06:01 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:02:15 -0500, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 09/24/2015 03:23 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 24/09/2015 21:40, Ole Ersoy a écrit :
Hi Luc,
I gave this
Hello,
I'm going to utilize Lombok in a CM design experiment. Once the experiment is
done CM can decide if it likes Lombok. I know that CM tries to stay dependency
free, so I just want to make clear that Lombok is compile time only:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6107197/how-does-lombok-w
Hello,
We have been discussing various ways to view what's happening internally with
algorithms, and the topic of including SLF4J has come up. I know that this was
discussed earlier and it was decided that CM is a low level dependency,
therefore it should minimize the transitive dependencies
Why should the instance throwing the exception hold a field with the
information?
Separation of concerns: optimizer does the computation,
then the exception holds what's needed for a full report of the failure.
I would see what makes sense on on case by case basis. For example if the
Observer
On 09/24/2015 06:01 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:02:15 -0500, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 09/24/2015 03:23 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 24/09/2015 21:40, Ole Ersoy a écrit :
Hi Luc,
I gave this some more thought, and I think I may have tapped out to
soon, even though you are absolutely
On 09/24/2015 04:05 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 08:43:38 -0500, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 09/24/2015 06:31 AM, luc wrote:
Le 2015-09-24 04:16, Ole Ersoy a écrit :
On 09/23/2015 03:09 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
CM is not intended to be a design pattern people should mimic. We are so bad
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
