like a
video system or a stereo system, or some other kind of system.
--
Martin Cooper
> I am not the guardian of the English lanugage (and neither is Wikipedia), I
> do not see compound nouns in English like as I do speakers of other languages
> use them.
>
> About the Wi
/press/
--
Martin Cooper
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>
---
ix, and worse, more and more people actually
respond to those instead of just pointing out that the prefix is
missing.
--
Martin Cooper
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Jukka Zitting
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anyone know of any sane way to filter the commons maili
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Julius Davies wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone have any tips for becoming a committer around these parts?
See the "How it works" page, and especially the section on meritocracy.
http://apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html
--
Martin Cooper
Maybe
ntained. If I see 2009, I'll simply take it as is without looking
> further.
A component may have had a major overhaul in the last week, but if the file
you happen to look at has been stable for the last 10 years, you would know
next to nothing about the state of the rest of the code you ha
ing along the lines of:
>>>
>>>
>>>test
>>>>>major="1"
>>>minor="2"/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
currently an ASF committer on any project.
Sandbox components can be created by ASF committers only. So I'd suggest
starting the project elsewhere for now.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> - if yes, what would be my next steps?
>
> Regards
> --Tim
>
>
"I looked at XML Commons in xml.apache.org, but it seems pretty dormant."
Perhaps this would be an opportunity to re-vitalize it? I really dislike the
implication that Commons should accept a new project simply because a more
appropriate parent project wasn't paying attention.
-
ones toys and going home", and are not
meant to imply that there's anything toy-like about Commons components. On
the contrary, I think we're both arguing that Commons components are
important enough that we want to find ways to encourage people to bring
reusable code here rather th
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > For example, one of the reasons people don't want to bring things to
> Commons
> > any more is bec
ure, in some form, to release some of the pieces, and the question
then becomes one of who would be willing to go through the extra steps to
create a release out of an internal shared library, especially if that was
not necessary for internal consumption.
No answers here, I'm afraid. Just some
Matt, could you please take a minute out of all your commits right now to
address this, please? I tend to agree with Niall that the code should be
removed until the clearance has been completed.
--
Martin Cooper
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
t the Gump team knows
who to nag when something breaks and doesn't get fixed. These days, I seem
to only see Gump nags when the whole lot fails for some reason, so I'm not
sure how useful having the individual names is any more.
--
Martin Cooper
> I think we should just use:
>
>
incubation? Given that you are the sole developer
and already a committer here, why not just drop it in the sandbox?
--
Martin Cooper
> I'd like to have the support of Commons as
> the sponsoring PMC. I'd also like it if I could get a
> couple of mentors from the group as
My 2 cents.
--
Martin Cooper
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have played with an idea for a new project for a few months. Asking for
> a few advices both at the ApacheCon Europe and by direct contact, all
> responses I re
o would not. (Yes, there are some components that do not conform, but
they existed prior to the instigation of the rule.)
--
Martin Cooper
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
The bug entries for projects that have moved to JIRA were removed from
Bugzilla as part of a recent upgrade. There's an open issue to remove the
links in JIRA, so that people are not following broken links.
--
Martin Cooper
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED
> should be via a page that points out that nightly builds are not for
> the casual user.
Yep. What we have in Struts is a link from the nav menu on the front page to
a Developers page, and all of the dev-only stuff, including links to nightly
builds, is on that page, o
ould be good to get infra to clear this up, one way or the other. I'd
prefer that we keep the links until we have the definitive answer.
--
Martin Cooper
On Nov 19, 2007 9:43 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The document
>
> http://commons.apache.org/releases/releas
On 8/25/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/25/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Martin Cooper wrote:
> >
> > > > GUMP builds are deemed non-trusted, since GUMP downloads from
> > > > non-ASF sites and incl
less we're circumventing that deliberately). That's a pretty
good reason not to use it for nightlies.
--
Martin Cooper
--- Noel
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
; component. It also looks for changes and executes builds hourly, so
> there can be multiple builds in a given day.
Given that, isn't Gump producing something closer to what we want for
nightly builds than Continuum? Why not use the Gump output for the
nightlies?
--
Martin Cooper
We ne
22 matches
Mail list logo
