On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:46 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Gump nag messages are currently sent from lots of different mail > addresses, all of which have to be subscribed (or allowed to post) to > the dev list.
IIRC (not a sure thing ;) it was set up this way so that the Gump team knows who to nag when something breaks and doesn't get fixed. These days, I seem to only see Gump nags when the whole lot fails for some reason, so I'm not sure how useful having the individual names is any more. -- Martin Cooper > I think we should just use: > > Gump <general AT gump.apache.org> > > for them all. > > This would avoid any problems if the real person from whom the mail is > supposed to come decides to unsubscribe from the list. > > Any reasons to keep the (historical) from settings? > > All the nags are sent to the dev address. > [If some nags were to be sent to outside addresses, then a specific > from address might be necessary] > > S/// > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
