On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:46 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The Gump nag messages are currently sent from lots of different mail
> addresses, all of which have to be subscribed (or allowed to post) to
> the dev list.


IIRC (not a sure thing ;) it was set up this way so that the Gump team knows
who to nag when something breaks and doesn't get fixed. These days, I seem
to only see Gump nags when the whole lot fails for some reason, so I'm not
sure how useful having the individual names is any more.

--
Martin Cooper


> I think we should just use:
>
> Gump <general AT  gump.apache.org>
>
> for them all.
>
> This would avoid any problems if the real person from whom the mail is
> supposed to come decides to unsubscribe from the list.
>
> Any reasons to keep the (historical) from settings?
>
> All the nags are sent to the dev address.
> [If some nags were to be sent to outside addresses, then a specific
> from address might be necessary]
>
> S///
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to