pt., 3 gru 2021 o 12:30 sebb napisał(a):
> Only TLPs can be moved to the Attic.
>
> Commons components can be moved to dormant if they are no longer being
> developed.
Thanks sebb, didn't know that :)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
---
And just to clarify one thing: by drop I mean moving the project into
the attic, I still would like to extract some stuff (like benchmarks)
into the code hosted at Github.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
pt., 26 lis 2021 o 10:28 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
>
&g
pt., 26 lis 2021 o 12:03 sebb napisał(a):
> Wrong mailing list?
Right, sorry for that and thanks for pointing this out :)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@
Hi,
A small problem was discovered in 2.5.27 and I would like to quickly
release 2.5.28 with the fix [1], then wait a few weeks and release
another 2.5.x with Yasser's changes and close the 2.5.x line (if no
more problems will be reported after the last version).
[1] https://github.com/apache/str
czw., 25 lis 2021 o 15:57 Mark Thomas napisał(a):
> Am I reading the archives correctly when I conclude there has never been
> an ASF release of Commons OGNL of any version? (snapshots don't count)
Yes, no stable release of Commons OGNL.
> Why will migrating changes from 3.x be any easier if the
czw., 25 lis 2021 o 15:42 Jason Pyeron napisał(a):
> > I wonder what do you think about dropping commons-ognl project? This
> > was supposed to be the next major version (4.x) but there was no
> > activity in the project for a long time. Also migrating all the
>
> Does not imply it is not used, lo
Hi,
I wonder what do you think about dropping commons-ognl project? This
was supposed to be the next major version (4.x) but there was no
activity in the project for a long time. Also migrating all the
changes from the previous Github version is rather an impossible task.
At the same time I want t
niedz., 27 gru 2020 o 21:14 Bernd Eckenfels napisał(a):
> I would say if the maven release plugin and the maven pgp plug-ins work (on
> your system and for the Pom) and the project builds on al l supported
> platforms, go for it. If you have your ASF login and thenPgpg key in the Keys
> file yo
Sorry, I was not subscribed to the list.
On 2020/12/25 01:18:00, Gary Gregory wrote:
> There might be a lot more to consider here since this would be a major
> release. Are there breaking API changes we want to make? Are there
> deprecated APIs we want to drop?
>
> I see a lot of errors fly by
Hi,
I would like to (finally) prepare a first release of the Apache
Commons OGNL project. I'm reading the docs [1][2], which I think is
enough to prepare the release.
Is it possible to release a version just to learn how to do the
release? I mean, there is still a lot of code that I would like to
2017-03-23 16:55 GMT+01:00 Javen O'Neal :
> The best solution is to document where you return an UnmodifiableSet versus
> a regular Set in your Javadocs.
Disagree, compare these two examples:
/**
* An immutable set, do not try to modify it
*/
private Set excluded;
vs
private UnmodifiableSet e
2017-03-23 16:35 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> On 23 March 2017 at 15:02, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>> 2017-03-23 14:37 GMT+01:00 sebb :
>>> Not sure I follow.
>>>
>>> What exactly can the compiler check?
>>
>> You can declare a variable or a field of type
2017-03-23 14:37 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> Not sure I follow.
>
> What exactly can the compiler check?
You can declare a variable or a field of type UnmodifiableSet but
there is no way to create instance of the type UnmodifiableSet - there
is no such constructor neither factory method :)
Regards
--
Łu
Hi,
I see that the Collections4 provides those classes. Anyway I wonder
why I the constructor is private and why the factory method
unmodifiableSet() returns Set?
I would love to use those classes directly, to be straightforward that
I expect the UnmodifiableSet and not just a Set.
What about ad
2016-11-08 8:33 GMT+01:00 Pascal Schumacher :
> Hello everybody,
>
> what about enabling travis-ci for commons-io, so that pull requests are
> tested automatically?
You can also setup Jenkins to build PRs
https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Struts/job/Struts-JDK7-pull-request/
Regards
--
Ł
llect the lint
> patches up and apply them when done.
>
> What does the group think?
>
> -Jason
>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: Lukasz Lenart (JIRA)
>> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 1:50
>> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (OGNL-
2013/12/31 Benedikt Ritter :
>> > > The old OGNL (legacy) releases use the
>> > >
>> > > "package ognl;"
>> > >
>> > > declarations, where as the apache releases will use
>> > >
>> > > "package org.apache.commons.ognl;"
>> > >
>> > > I would create a set of proxy classes in the old package
>> > spa
Did some cleanup in JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL/fixforversion/12323958
2013/12/30 Lukasz Lenart :
> 2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron :
>> There are a lot of formatting chenges between the version in git and apache
>> svn.
>> I am still looking for "patches&
2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron :
> There are a lot of formatting chenges between the version in git and apache
> svn.
> I am still looking for "patches" in git not yet applied to subversion, do you
> know of any?
All should be already applied or don't affect Apache's version
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 60
x27;s very neat.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Simone Tripodi
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>> Is there list of changes, sort of a release notes?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Sure, we tra
Jason submitted his patch [1], what should we do? apply or leave it?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-239
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
2013/11/14 Christian Grobmeier :
> On 14 Nov 2013, at 10:01, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
>> Le 10/11/2013 21:46, Chri
Ok, so let's leave logging layer for now and we should focus on
preparing the first release
2013/11/9 Gary Gregory :
> Neither does log4j 2 ;)
>
> Original message
> From: henrib
> Date:11/09/2013 12:23 (GMT-05:00)
> To: dev@commons.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [OGNL] Make use of
2013/11/7 Jason Pyeron :
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Benedikt Ritter
>> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 11:00
>>
>> Yes, as long as it's Log4j2 ;-)
>
> Now I need a sed script to replace j.u.l. to it...
>
> Is Log4j2 the one that is desired? I figured SLF4J was going to be the
> req
2013/11/5 Christian Grobmeier :
> On 5 Nov 2013, at 14:29, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>
>> So what's the idea here? Should we apply additional logging layer (as
>> Jason proposed)? Or throw it away and start thinking about new
>> release?
>>
>> I have reviewed TO
son Pyeron :
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 4:28
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [OGNL] Make use of logging?
>>
>> 2013/9/4 Lukasz Lenart
>>
>
2013/9/3 Christian Grobmeier :
> I found 11 uses of e.printStackTrace and think its pretty bad.
> Including OgnlException overwrites printStackTrace and writes to
> System.err for some reason.
>
> In addition there are a lot of System.out's, but those are all commented
> and seem to have served deb
2013/9/3 Christian Grobmeier :
> I found this in ognl pom:
>
>
> org.apache.maven.plugins
> maven-checkstyle-plugin
> 2.7
>
> config/maven_checks.xml
> config/maven-header.txt
>
>
>
> I thought I
I have removed @Deprecated methods, tomorrow will review all the
TODOs. After that we can start planning the release.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@common
2013/3/26 Maurizio Cucchiara :
> Do you mean this [1] isEvalChain method?
>
> [1]
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/ognl/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/ognl/SimpleNode.java
IDEA cheats me ;-) It used wrong version ;-)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart
2013/3/26 Maurizio Cucchiara :
> I thought that it won't be a piece of cake, but we might make it
> easier, for example what about to start a new branch on struts to
> integrate the new version of OGNL? (perhaps this is not the right
> place, or at least the only place, where this discussion should
2013/3/26 Christian Grobmeier :
> +1, go for it.
> Now its time to see if our testcases are good.
They are, I made a slight mistake and tests showed that :-)
> I also think we should test it in conjunction with struts.
Not so easy, OGNL 4 is a different beast, but I'll try ;-)
Regards
--
Łuka
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-232
2013/3/26 Lukasz Lenart :
> Ok, done. Should I just commit the changes? Or do I have to register
> an issue first in JIRA? Maybe it will be better...
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Łukasz
> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
>
Ok, done. Should I just commit the changes? Or do I have to register
an issue first in JIRA? Maybe it will be better...
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
2013/3/26 Lukasz Lenart :
> I'm not sure what API should be removed/renamed/etc as almost
> everythin
0:11 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 6 March 2013 06:49, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was checking out what should be solved before releasing a new
>>> version and in my opinion most of PMD [1] errors can be omitted, maybe
>>> "These nested if
Hi,
I was checking out what should be solved before releasing a new
version and in my opinion most of PMD [1] errors can be omitted, maybe
"These nested if statements could be combined" should be resolved, but
the rest I don't see a point instead of just satisfying PMD itself.
Some of the Findbug
2013/3/2 Olivier Lamy :
> 2013/3/2 Lukasz Lenart :
>> 2013/3/1 Olivier Lamy :
>>>> -
>>>> site-content
>>>> +
>>>> ${project.build.directory}/site-content
>>> so if you use mvn clean. You will checkout again the content from
2013/3/1 Olivier Lamy :
>> -
>> site-content
>> +
>> ${project.build.directory}/site-content
> so if you use mvn clean. You will checkout again the content from svn.
> The goal with using site-content directory is to do only update rather
> than a full checkout even when using clean.
Yes,
2013/3/1 Olivier Lamy :
> to test website it's the usual: mvn clean site (then browse files in
> target/site/)
> to deploy: mvn clean site-deploy.
> and site-content must excluded from rat. Do you want to fix that ? If not I
> can.
I just moved site-content into target/ folder and that solved the
2013/3/1 Lukasz Lenart :
> How can I update ognl website? Simple checkout [1] and update what I
> need? and then what to do?
I found this [1], but I have one question, how to check locally how
the site will look like before deploying it? I have the only solution:
mvn clean site
copy targe
How can I update ognl website? Simple checkout [1] and update what I
need? and then what to do?
eg. RAT report is broken as it includes all the html files [2]
[1]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/commons/content/proper/commons-ognl/
[2] http://commons.apache.org/proper/comm
Why the Download section is commented out in the site.xml ?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-231
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.o
ech.. I don't want to complain, but I had (have) the same problem with
Struts project which is basically related to pushing changes directly
into production branch, which means you cannot test the changes on the
staging before pushing to production :\
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://ww
2013/2/2 Olivier Lamy :
> That's because maven relativize urls while building the site.
>
> Check a maven site build log you will see something like:
> Relativizing decoration links with respect to project URL:
> http://commons.apache.org/ognl/
> So as the link for commons home is declared as
> htt
2013/1/30 Olivier Lamy :
> Hi Folks,
> Ok to go live ?
>
> Something missing ? (maybe sandbox parent release ?)
When I enter a subproject and then I want to go back to the main page
via Home link on the right (under Commons section), it directs me to
proper/ which simply returns directory listing.
2013/1/8 Lukasz Lenart :
>> AFAICS you won't be able to release with 27, because of the new svnpub
>> requirement for the site and 28 is not ready yet, waiting for INFRA. See
>> vote thread for commons-email.
>
> Thanks Jörg!
Looks like something changed as
2013/1/8 Jörg Schaible :
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT,
>> should it be simple 27 - the latest released version?
>
> AFAICS you won't be able to release
2013/1/8 Christian Grobmeier :
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>> Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT,
>> should it be simple 27 - the latest released version?
>
> Not sure about the differences of these 2, but I t
Hi,
Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT,
should it be simple 27 - the latest released version?
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs
How to generate reports locally ?
Thanks in advance
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
2012/10/24 Maurizio Cucchiara :
> That's really weird, last time I have seen (and also corrected) a bunch of
> error like this, but they all were more than justified.
>
> I'll try to generate the report and see what happens.
Maybe the website is out of sync ? How to deploy a new version ?
Regard
2012/3/9 Simone Tripodi :
> I don't think it is necessary when fixing this kind of issues, unless
> you need to heavily change the code, but I don't suspect so ;)
> let me know if I can be helpful in some way - more than just helping
> on fixing issues :P
I have few doubts regarding checkstyle rep
2011/6/20 Jason Pyeron :
> Please let me know how it should be handled.
>
> Both the JIRA xml export and the attachments.
>
> (this message is going to 2 lists struts and commons, you do not have to reply
> to both)
Here [1] you have XWork related issue, you can create another one for Ognl
[1] ht
You're right, it looks like releasing 3.0.2 from GitHub is the best
option. I'll try to prepare a release ASAP and then talk to Sonatype
guys ;-)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
---
2011/6/11 Jochen Wiedmann :
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Lukasz Lenart
> wrote:
>
>> Sure, not a problem, but how long it will take ? Jochen ?
>
> Dunno. Ask me again in a week or so. :-) Or feel free to take the task over.
Thanks Jochen! I'm asking because we
e, but he's
> working in order to have OGNL-8 fixed, I'd wait for it before
> releasing it.
> WDYT? Have a nice weekend, all the best!
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Luka
Hi all,
Can we make a new release ? OGNL is under incubation still but that
shouldn't be a problem.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
-
To uns
+1 for dropping the old way of build
REgards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additio
+1 for JIRA space and issues@commons.a.o
Kind regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
Fo
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paul Benedict
Date: 2011/3/3
Subject: Re: OGNL as a part of Commons
To: Struts Developers List
Count me in for backup. If someone gets tied up with day work and you need
an extra hand, I will help take over for that person the best I can.
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dave Newton
Date: 2011/3/3
Subject: Re: OGNL as a part of Commons
To: Struts Developers List , lukasz.len...@gmail.com
DW: Lukasz Lenart
It seems like it might be a good idea for the ASF to have a performant
(how I hate that word) EL, possible
,
you can count on me too, feel free to tell me how I can help you (I've
already subscribed on every apache commons mailing list and incubator
one too)
On 3 March 2011 12:04, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As Antonio suggested, is anybody else interested here in supporting
> O
2011/3/3 Simone Tripodi :
> Anyone more? :)
You can count on me, but I'm a Struts Committer.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Confitura 2011 http://confitura.pl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubsc
2011/3/3 Antonio Petrelli :
> 2011/3/3 Lukasz Lenart :
>> Moving OGNL to Struts 2 could have one pitfall - it can be driven by
>> the project's needs. But that can be good as well ;-)
>
> Just a note FWIW. Spring WebFlow also uses OGNL.
So, OGNL as a TPL project wo
Moving OGNL to Struts 2 could have one pitfall - it can be driven by
the project's needs. But that can be good as well ;-)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Confitura 2011 http://confitura.pl
-
To uns
2011/3/1 Stephen Colebourne :
> Based on what I know of OGNL, it is/was reasonably well used. Trying
> to merge it into another project doesn't help those existing users.
Yep, that's true
> The question is what are the author(s) of OGNL looking for? A home for
> maintainance? The Apache brand? To
2011/3/1 Antonio Petrelli :
> There is another problem: is OpenSymphony willing to donate the code to
> Apache?
> It's not only a problem of "forking", because the entire copyright
> will pass to Apache, at least for the donated code as it is (the
> copyright will remain to OpenSymphony until the
Hi,
So, where I should start ?
Kind regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Kapituła Javarsovia http://javarsovia.pl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-
2010/12/15 Jörg Schaible :
> What happened to OpenSymphony that you cannot use their infrastructure
> anymore?
I don't know, there was some rumor about domain owners or so. Also
other projects were moved out from OpenSymphony: WebWork became Struts
2, XWork was moved to ASF and it's a part of Stru
2010/12/14 sebb :
> So does it offer anything that JEXL does not?
I think no, it looks like JEXL2 is even much better than OGNL. I don't
know JEXL2 so deep, but with OGNL you can create objects directly ("o
= new Object()") and you can call methods with parameters
("foo.doit(o)").
Kind regards
-
2010/12/13 sebb :
>> OGNL is an Expression Language like UEL, it has some nice features
>> like calling statics or using constructors. It's used internally by
>> Struts 2 to evaluate user expressions and not only in JSP but in any
>> other place.
>
> In which case it seems to be similar to Commons
2010/12/13 Gary Gregory :
> I am wondering how OGNL relates to Commons JXPath
> http://commons.apache.org/jxpath/
>
> When would you use one vs. the other?
OGNL is an Expression Language like UEL, it has some nice features
like calling statics or using constructors. It's used internally by
Struts
Hi all,
I want to ask you all, is it possible to include OGNL
(https://github.com/jkuhnert/ognl , http://www.opensymphony.com/ognl/
) into Commons project?
As I know OGNL is used by few ASF projects (Struts 2, Tapestry) and
right now it's homeless project. It's very hard to prepare a new
release,
72 matches
Mail list logo
