I’m in favor of releasing 1.8 because it’s ready and has had the most attention
in recent months/years.
After such, we put eyes on the 2.0 branch to ensure it is ready to be the
successive version. Once we’re happy with that, create a 1.x brach from master,
bring 2.0 to master, and see if we can
Hello.
Le mar. 21 janv. 2020 à 18:28, Rob Tompkins a écrit :
>
>
>
> > On Jan 21, 2020, at 12:24 PM, Matt Juntunen
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Do we agree that compatibility can be broken
> >> under package "org.apache.commons.beta"?
>
> My impression was that BC can be broken moving from be
On 17/01/2020 17:21, Alex Herbert wrote:
A uniform sampler of the IEEE 754 finite doubles would sample from a
log-uniform distribution as the limiting distribution and I don't
think that is actually what people require when creating random double
data. So either it: (a) is discarded as an ide
> On Jan 21, 2020, at 12:24 PM, Matt Juntunen wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Do we agree that compatibility can be broken
>> under package "org.apache.commons.beta"?
My impression was that BC can be broken moving from beta to first major
release, regardless. But, changing the package name certainly mak
> Do we agree that compatibility can be broken
> under package "org.apache.commons.beta"?
I believe so. If not, there wouldn't be much of a reason to do a beta version
in the first place; we would just release 1.0 and then quickly jump to 2.0 (if
needed).
> Note that "Numbers" should be release
Hello.
Le mar. 21 janv. 2020 à 14:41, Matt Juntunen
a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> I think that commons-geometry is ready for a beta release, as discussed
> previously. If there are no objections, how do we make that happen?
Note that "Numbers" should be released first (eventually "beta" too).
Best,
On 21/01/2020 15:35, Gary Gregory wrote:
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/csv/CSVRecord.java
b/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/csv/CSVRecord.java
index 471e94d..e32cd5a 100644
--- a/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/csv/CSVRecord.java
+++ b/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/csv/CSVR
>
>
>
> @@ -77,4 +77,4 @@ public class JiraCsv248Test {
> private static InputStream getTestInput() {
> return
> ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader().getResourceAsStream("CSV-248/csvRecord.bin");
> }
> -}
> \ No newline at end of file
> +}
>
>
1) No newline at end of file
2) Should
>
>
> +@Test
> +public void testDeserialisation() throws IOException {
> +CSVRecord shortRec;
> +try (final CSVParser parser = CSVParser.parse("A,B\n#my
> comment\nOne,Two", CSVFormat.DEFAULT.withHeader().withCommentMarker('#'))) {
> +shortRec = parser.iterator()
>
>
>
> diff --git a/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/csv/CSVRecord.java
> b/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/csv/CSVRecord.java
> index 471e94d..e32cd5a 100644
> --- a/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/csv/CSVRecord.java
> +++ b/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/csv/CSVRecord.java
> @@ -83,6 +83,12
Dear Apache enthusiast,
(You’re receiving this message because you are subscribed to one or more
project mailing lists at the Apache Software Foundation.)
The call for presentations for ApacheCon North America 2020 is now open
at https://apachecon.com/acna2020/cfp
ApacheCon will be held at
Hi.
Le mar. 21 janv. 2020 à 14:47, Rob Tompkins a écrit :
>
> I can try to help with that later this week potentially. My main question is:
> do we want to change the base package name across the component to
> `org.apache.commons.beta` for the beta release?
+1
Follow-up question: Do we agree
I can try to help with that later this week potentially. My main question is:
do we want to change the base package name across the component to
`org.apache.commons.beta` for the beta release?
-Rob
> On Jan 21, 2020, at 8:41 AM, Matt Juntunen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I think that commons-geomet
Hello,
I think that commons-geometry is ready for a beta release, as discussed
previously. If there are no objections, how do we make that happen?
Regards,
Matt J
On 20/01/2020 23:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 7:39 AM Alex Herbert
wrote:
Hi Gary,
I raised a few niggles a while back with CSV and the discussion did not
receive a response on how to proceed.
There is the major bug CSV-248 where the CSVRecord is not Serializable
[1]. Th
Hello.
2020-01-20 20:39 UTC+01:00, Matt Juntunen :
> Gilles,
>
>> I was not indicating that the name "EuclideanTransform" would be
>> better than "AffineTransform", I was wondering about whether the
>> class itself is redundant.
>
> Oh, I misunderstood. The "EuclideanTransform" interface is import
16 matches
Mail list logo