Hi Sebb,
sebb wrote:
> On 26 October 2016 at 17:50, Jörg Schaible wrote:
[snip]
>> We have commons-build in proper. Don't know what it is used for, but it
>> looks like an old Maven 1 project ;-)
>
> Commons-build is current.
> It is even documented. See:
>
> http://commons.apache.org/proper
2016-10-26 21:55 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory :
> Why not make the component require Java 7 and be done with it?
>
>
no objection from my side
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > 2016-10-26 21:35 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter :
> >
> >
Why not make the component require Java 7 and be done with it?
Gary
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> 2016-10-26 21:35 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter :
>
> > Hello Thomas,
> >
> > Thomas Vandahl schrieb am Fr., 21. Okt. 2016 um 19:42
> Uhr:
> >
> > > I would like to beta
2016-10-26 21:35 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter :
> Hello Thomas,
>
> Thomas Vandahl schrieb am Fr., 21. Okt. 2016 um 19:42 Uhr:
>
> > I would like to beta-release the [jcs] component.
> >
> > Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 RC1 is available for review at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/co
Hello,
schrieb am Di., 25. Okt. 2016 um 22:59 Uhr:
> Repository: commons-csv
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master b2a50d4a3 -> 1c7a9910b
>
>
> [CSV-201] Do not use RuntimeException in CSVParser.iterator().new
> Iterator() {...}.getNextRecord(). Use an IllegalStateException instead
> (KISS f
Hello Thomas,
Thomas Vandahl schrieb am Fr., 21. Okt. 2016 um 19:42 Uhr:
> I would like to beta-release the [jcs] component.
>
> Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 RC1 is available for review at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/jcs/ (r16621).
>
> Maven artifacts are at:
> https:/
Am 25.10.2016 um 21:38 schrieb Oliver Heger :
> when building on Windows 10 with Java 1.6 I get the error below. The
> build with Java 1.8 is successful.
>
> On the distributions, I found some problems:
> - Both the source and the binary distribution deflate in the same
> folder. Typically, differ
> Am 26.10.2016 um 00:19 schrieb sebb :
> Reminder: releases cannot be vetoed [1]
> They pass if there are at least 3 +1 and more +1 than -1.
>
You're technically right, however -1 votes tend to keep others from voting.
We could need your vote, too.
> However I have just noticed that the dist
Hello Thomas,
Thomas Vandahl schrieb am Di., 25. Okt. 2016 um 21:06 Uhr:
> Hi Benedikt,
>
> On 24.10.16 08:34, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> > Sorry, if that has been decided, I must have missed it. I'll take another
> > look tonight.
>
> Could you please reconsider your vote? I fixed the check sums
Hello Sebastian,
sebb schrieb am Mi., 26. Okt. 2016 um 00:25 Uhr:
> On 25 October 2016 at 20:06, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> > Hi Benedikt,
> >
> > On 24.10.16 08:34, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> >> Sorry, if that has been decided, I must have missed it. I'll take
> another
> >> look tonight.
> >
> > C
dbrosIus schrieb am Di., 25. Okt. 2016 um
18:26 Uhr:
> I think we should let the people doing the work, decide.
>
I agree with David. Apache is a Do-ocracy.
Nevertheless I think we should focus on finishing the first release of RNG
instead of starting of the next component. we already have som
On 26 October 2016 at 17:50, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Artem Barger wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Gilles
>> wrote:
>>
>>> could not find "commons-rng-build-tools" (posted a question in maven ML
> list).
>
The reactor of Maven does not consider plugins itself or depen
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Gilles
wrote:
>
> But the modules link are still dead.
> [E.g. there is no "apidocs".]
Added aggregation of javadocs for parent project.
Best regards,
Artem Barger.
Artem Barger wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Gilles
> wrote:
>
>> could not find "commons-rng-build-tools" (posted a question in maven ML
list).
>>>
>>> The reactor of Maven does not consider plugins itself or dependencies to
>>> plugins for its build order (by design). To su
Artem Barger wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Jörg Schaible <
> joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> The reactor of Maven does not consider plugins itself or dependencies to
>> plugins for its build order (by design). To support something like this,
>> you
>> will have to produ
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:31:18 +0300, Artem Barger wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Gilles
wrote:
Try "mvn install site"
That works but does not build the complete site, for which I'd
invoke
$ mvn site:stage
Can you try now? I've pushed some changes.
$ mvn clean install sit
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> Try "mvn install site"
>>>
>>
> That works but does not build the complete site, for which I'd
> invoke
>
> $ mvn site:stage
Can you try now? I've pushed some changes.
Best regards,
Artem Barger.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> could not find "commons-rng-build-tools" (posted a question in maven ML
>>> list).
>>>
>>
>> The reactor of Maven does not consider plugins itself or dependencies to
>> plugins for its build order (by design). To support something like this,
>> you
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:30:45 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Artem,
Artem Barger wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Gilles
wrote:
What is the command to "build everything"?
I tried
$ mvn site
Try "mvn install site"
That works but does not build the complete site, for
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Jörg Schaible <
joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
>
> The reactor of Maven does not consider plugins itself or dependencies to
> plugins for its build order (by design). To support something like this,
> you
> will have to produce a released artifact first.
Hi Artem,
Artem Barger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Gilles
> wrote:
>
>> What is the command to "build everything"?
>>
>>
>
>> I tried
>> $ mvn site
>>
>
> Try "mvn install site"
> instead. For some reason dependencies between is not sorted out and
> maven
> could
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> What is the command to "build everything"?
>
>
> I tried
> $ mvn site
>
Try "mvn install site"
instead. For some reason dependencies between is not sorted out and
maven
could not find "commons-rng-build-tools" (posted a question in
Hello.
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 03:14:59 +0300, Artem Barger wrote:
Hi,
While working on creating multi module configuration for commons-rng
component I've extracted all configurations for maven plugins such
as: pmd,
findbugs, checkstyle into separate module "commons-rng-build-tools".
Such
that pa
Hi Eric.
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:48:17 +0200, Eric Barnhill wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Gilles
wrote:
It sounds like you can create your new component on top of math4,
correct?
Would you rather reply to the technical arguments put forward in the
preceding paragraph?
I've al
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Gilles
wrote:
>
>> It sounds like you can create your new component on top of math4, correct?
>>
>
> Would you rather reply to the technical arguments put forward in the
> preceding paragraph?
>
> I've already answered your question many times (see the archive).
>
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:00:55 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Eric Barnhill
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
>
> I am against this constant spinning out.
>
> Gary
>
>
The proposed commons-filter is not a spin out. There was one filter
Hi Gary.
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:59:27 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
I am against spinning out org.apache.commons.math4.complex out into
yet
another component. The argument that Gilles refuses to
support org.apache.commons.math4.complex because he does not want to
support all of org.apache.commons.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Jörg Schaible <
joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
> Because you must have a mechanism to trigger the e.g. the PMD plugin
> individually, if you put the declarationsof it into the commons parent
> (pluginManagement as well as report).
>
>
Ok, I see, I didn't
Hi Artem,
Artem Barger wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Jörg Schaible <
> joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
>
>> You may put both parts into an own profile that is activated
>> automatically at the extistence of pmd/pmd-ruleset.xml. Each component
>> has then a chance to use it or
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Jörg Schaible <
joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
> You may put both parts into an own profile that is activated automatically
> at the extistence of pmd/pmd-ruleset.xml. Each component has then a chance
> to use it or not simply by providing that file.
>
N
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:20 AM, sebb wrote:
> Why not include it in commons parent?
>
Because than it will introduce cyclic dependencies I guess. You will
declare "commons-parent"
is parent module and later add it as dependency for maven plugin config.
Best regards,
Art
Artem Barger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While working on creating multi module configuration for commons-rng
> component I've extracted all configurations for maven plugins such as:
> pmd, findbugs, checkstyle into separate module "commons-rng-build-tools".
> Such that parent project can now refer to it wi
32 matches
Mail list logo
