dbrosIus <dbros...@baybroadband.net> schrieb am Di., 25. Okt. 2016 um 18:26 Uhr:
> I think we should let the people doing the work, decide. > I agree with David. Apache is a Do-ocracy. Nevertheless I think we should focus on finishing the first release of RNG instead of starting of the next component. we already have some proper components who have never seen a release (imaging, functor, OGNL 4.0) and I don't want the new math components to have the same fate. Benedikt > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> > Date: 10/25/16 11:51 AM (GMT-05:00) > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [complex] commons-complex module > > Le 25/10/2016 à 17:46, Jochen Wiedmann a écrit : > > Honestly, I really wonder why all this stuff has to fork yet another > > commons component. IMO, CM could just have been changed to emit > > multiple jar files with no need for other components. No need for > > discussions, no need for new repositories in Git, no need for new > > stuff in Jira. Or, to put it different: Less to maintain. > > +1 > > This should have been a module of commons-math, there was no consensus > for a new component. > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
