On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> >> It sounds like you can create your new component on top of math4, correct? >> > > Would you rather reply to the technical arguments put forward in the > preceding paragraph? > > I've already answered your question many times (see the archive). > > You do not need anything else? Aside from a better component name IMO. >> "filter" is way to generic for me. >> > > Is that the crux of the matter? > "Math" wasn't too generic perhaps? > > Gilles Hi Gilles, I read this email differently than you. My understanding is that Gary is open to a filter subproject but would just like a different name (to which Bernd replied). But, I don't really know what he meant by the expression "built on top of math 4". I did not interpret it as putting all these new modules in math4 . Eric
