Re: [VFS] BC breaks in VFS 2.1 RC1

2016-05-06 Thread Gary Gregory
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > That was me. I have had those thoughts and mentioned them a few times > since Java 7 was released. But absolutely no effort has been expended to do > it. > > My personal opinion is that I am comfortable with releasing 2.1 with the > issues Gar

Re: [VFS] BC breaks in VFS 2.1 RC1

2016-05-06 Thread Ralph Goers
That was me. I have had those thoughts and mentioned them a few times since Java 7 was released. But absolutely no effort has been expended to do it. My personal opinion is that I am comfortable with releasing 2.1 with the issues Gary mentions. There should have been 10 releases for VFS 2 by no

Re: [VFS] BC breaks in VFS 2.1 RC1

2016-05-06 Thread Gary Gregory
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > I thought there were talks about using Java 1.7 APIs in 3.0 that would > eliminate the need for some classes in commons-vfs, or am I confusing that > with another commons project? > You are correct, but this is a big job worthy of a major rele

Re: [VFS] BC breaks in VFS 2.1 RC1

2016-05-06 Thread Matt Sicker
I thought there were talks about using Java 1.7 APIs in 3.0 that would eliminate the need for some classes in commons-vfs, or am I confusing that with another commons project? On 6 May 2016 at 17:46, Gary Gregory wrote: > OK, I've gone through the Clirr report and fixed the low-hanging fruits in

Re: [VFS] BC breaks in VFS 2.1 RC1

2016-05-06 Thread Gary Gregory
OK, I've gone through the Clirr report and fixed the low-hanging fruits in trunk. I think we need another RC. I've also update Apache Commons Compress and Net to their current versions. Then what we have to live with for 2.1 is BC breaks in two narrower areas: - Added methods to interfaces. - Cha

Re: [VFS] BC breaks in VFS 2.1 RC1

2016-05-06 Thread Jörg Schaible
sebb wrote: > On 6 May 2016 at 22:40, Gary Gregory wrote: >> I'm creating a new thread here instead of hijacking the VOTE thread. >> >> First, let me express my gratitude to Stian Soiland-Reyes for RM'ing a >> release, I'm sure he did not know what he was getting himself into! ;-) > > Huh? ... t

Re: [VFS] BC breaks in VFS 2.1 RC1

2016-05-06 Thread Gary Gregory
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 3:00 PM, sebb wrote: > On 6 May 2016 at 22:40, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I'm creating a new thread here instead of hijacking the VOTE thread. > > > > First, let me express my gratitude to Stian Soiland-Reyes for RM'ing a > > release, I'm sure he did not know what he was gett

Re: [VFS] BC breaks in VFS 2.1 RC1

2016-05-06 Thread sebb
On 6 May 2016 at 22:40, Gary Gregory wrote: > I'm creating a new thread here instead of hijacking the VOTE thread. > > First, let me express my gratitude to Stian Soiland-Reyes for RM'ing a > release, I'm sure he did not know what he was getting himself into! ;-) Huh? ... that was/is Josh Elser.

[VFS] BC breaks in VFS 2.1 RC1

2016-05-06 Thread Gary Gregory
I'm creating a new thread here instead of hijacking the VOTE thread. First, let me express my gratitude to Stian Soiland-Reyes for RM'ing a release, I'm sure he did not know what he was getting himself into! ;-) Part of me writing this here is flushing out for myself, voters, and casual observers

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons VFS 2.1 rc1

2016-05-06 Thread Josh Elser
Gary Gregory wrote: Some of the versions of jars in this page are out of date. Why not refer to the generated page: https://home.apache.org/~elserj/commons/commons-vfs-2.1/dependency-management.html from the "About" page and other places if any? +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.3 based on RC1

2016-05-06 Thread Gary Gregory
Hit 'Send' too soon: +1 Building from src zip, MD5, SHA1, ASC OK. Builds OK with 'mvn clean site' using (aside from the usual slf4j BC mess failures): Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5; 2015-11-10T08:41:47-08:00) Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-3.3.9\bin\.. Java vers

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.3 based on RC1

2016-05-06 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 Building from src zip, MD5, SHA1, ASC OK. Builds OK with 'mvn clean site' using: On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 1:12 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > we have fixed some bugs and added some nice new features since we released > Apache Commons CSV 1.2. So I'd like to release Apache Commons CSV 1

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons VFS 2.1 rc1

2016-05-06 Thread Gary Gregory
I am recording here what I've found and tested (no VOTE yet): Minor: [INFO] --- maven-bundle-plugin:3.0.1:manifest (bundle-manifest) @ commons-vfs2-project --- [WARN] Ignoring project type pom - supportedProjectTypes = [jar, bundle] Plain wrong but not a blocker IMO (could be hacked post release

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons VFS 2.1 rc1

2016-05-06 Thread Josh Elser
Thanks Gary! Will keep an eye out. Gary Gregory wrote: Sorry, quite busy this week, I'll try to take a look later today or this weekend. Gary On May 6, 2016 7:24 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote: Well, we've already passed the 3day vote window and have no binding votes. **PMC, please vote.** (Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons VFS 2.1 rc1

2016-05-06 Thread Gary Gregory
Sorry, quite busy this week, I'll try to take a look later today or this weekend. Gary On May 6, 2016 7:24 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote: > Well, we've already passed the 3day vote window and have no binding votes. > **PMC, please vote.** > > (Thanks to Stian for the nonbinding vote) > > Consider the v

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons VFS 2.1 rc1

2016-05-06 Thread Josh Elser
Well, we've already passed the 3day vote window and have no binding votes. **PMC, please vote.** (Thanks to Stian for the nonbinding vote) Consider the vote extended another 48hrs. On May 3, 2016 11:43 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote: > All, > > Please consider the following for Apache Commons VFS2 vers

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons VFS 2.1 rc1

2016-05-06 Thread Josh Elser
On May 6, 2016 2:45 AM, "Jörg Schaible" wrote: > > Hi Josh, > > Josh Elser wrote: > > > Jörg Schaible wrote: > >> Jörg Schaible wrote: > >> > >>> > Hi Josh, > >>> > > >>> > Josh Elser wrote: > >>> > > >> Oh, well then! No pressure:) > >> > >> I'll have to find some time to re-re

Re: Fixing the commons-io javadoc

2016-05-06 Thread Benson Margulies
I think I've fixed it. On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:35 AM, sebb wrote: > CMS does not apply to the component websites. > > It only applies to the parent site. > > On 6 May 2016 at 14:21, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Fr., 6. Mai 2016 um >> 15:20 Uhr: >> >>> Hello Benson, >>>

Re: Fixing the commons-io javadoc

2016-05-06 Thread sebb
CMS does not apply to the component websites. It only applies to the parent site. On 6 May 2016 at 14:21, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Fr., 6. Mai 2016 um > 15:20 Uhr: > >> Hello Benson, >> >> Benson Margulies schrieb am Fr., 6. Mai 2016 um >> 14:29 Uhr: >> >>> I'd like

Re: Fixing the commons-io javadoc

2016-05-06 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Fr., 6. Mai 2016 um 15:20 Uhr: > Hello Benson, > > Benson Margulies schrieb am Fr., 6. Mai 2016 um > 14:29 Uhr: > >> I'd like to. >> >> Problem 1: >> >> On this page, the 2.4 link points to a generic 'api-release' directory >> instead of to 2.4. >> >> http://commons.ap

Re: Fixing the commons-io javadoc

2016-05-06 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Benson, Benson Margulies schrieb am Fr., 6. Mai 2016 um 14:29 Uhr: > I'd like to. > > Problem 1: > > On this page, the 2.4 link points to a generic 'api-release' directory > instead of to 2.4. > > http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-io/ > > I'd fix that, but when I use the CMS bookmar

Fixing the commons-io javadoc

2016-05-06 Thread Benson Margulies
I'd like to. Problem 1: On this page, the 2.4 link points to a generic 'api-release' directory instead of to 2.4. http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-io/ I'd fix that, but when I use the CMS bookmarklet on this page, I'm not shown the content of this page, I'm shown the top of the entire c

Re: [VALIDATOR] CheckDigit implementation for German identity cards?

2016-05-06 Thread sebb
On 5 May 2016 at 20:46, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Di., 3. Mai 2016 um > 22:49 Uhr: > >> Hello, >> >> I have the need for a validator implementation that can check German >> identity card numbers. It's pretty simple to implement something like this >> using ModulusCheckDi

Re: [VALIDATOR] CheckDigit implementation for German identity cards?

2016-05-06 Thread sebb
On 5 May 2016 at 20:50, Gary Gregory wrote: > I wonder if we should have packages for various country codes like > o.a.c.validator.de ? Then this class would go in there. Seems excessive to have a separate package for a single class file. > Gary > > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Benedikt Ritt

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.3 based on RC1

2016-05-06 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, we have fixed some bugs and added some nice new features since we released Apache Commons CSV 1.2. So I'd like to release Apache Commons CSV 1.3 based on RC 1. Apache Commons CSV 1.3 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/csv/csv-1.3-RC1 (revision 1