Well, we've already passed the 3day vote window and have no binding votes.
**PMC, please vote.**

(Thanks to Stian for the nonbinding vote)

Consider the vote extended another 48hrs.
On May 3, 2016 11:43 PM, "Josh Elser" <els...@apache.org> wrote:

> All,
>
> Please consider the following for Apache Commons VFS2 version 2.1 (rc1).
>
> Maven repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1163
> Artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/vfs/ r13511
>
> MD5  commons-vfs-distribution-2.1-bin.tar.gz
> 1192914d1ba6f8ca3a2a688feeff602c
> SHA1 commons-vfs-distribution-2.1-bin.tar.gz
> 285097f1db6cbc9d76ae5bb3adf66a315344a864
> MD5  commons-vfs-distribution-2.1-src.tar.gz
> 0646187562302a7dcfbddb93204fc9eb
> SHA1 commons-vfs-distribution-2.1-src.tar.gz
> 24bab87fd4049b9389acd1b6e272f405630aeb25
> MD5  commons-vfs-distribution-2.1-bin.zip 3785874aa0cda64d68acbb8fb7db8bea
> SHA1 commons-vfs-distribution-2.1-bin.zip
> 942a23fb202b89b1a8432beeb0a66469959e661d
> MD5  commons-vfs-distribution-2.1-src.zip c8ef43d308bed1b3ffcb363c15285176
> SHA1 commons-vfs-distribution-2.1-src.zip
> 1ddf0d218f659766f136894eab0beca504ab9f8c
>
> Signed with 4677D66C from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/commons/KEYS
>
> SVN tag is available at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/vfs/tags/commons-vfs-project-2.1-RC1/
> r1742212
>
> Staged Maven website:
> http://home.apache.org/~elserj/commons/commons-vfs-2.1/
>
> All reports are available in the provided staged Maven site (see "Project
> Reports" at the root-level as well as under each sub-module).
> JIRA-generated release notes are available in the dist.a.o "Artifacts"
> repository. Unit tests pass and the RC was built util JDK6.
>
> (For Sebb) A direct Clirr link
> http://home.apache.org/~elserj/commons/commons-vfs-2.1/commons-vfs2/clirr-report.html
>
> Changes since rc0:
>
> * Improved release notes and website for compatibility
> * Fixes to pom.xml for building website
>
> This vote will be open for 72-hours, 2016/05/06 0400 UTC.
>
>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts as version 2.1
>   [ ] 0  OK, but...
>   [ ] -1 I oppose these artifacts as version 2.1 because..
>
> - Josh
>

Reply via email to