On 08/30/2015 04:13 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 14:45:19 -0500, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 08/30/2015 08:18 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 22:21:55 -0500, Ole Ersoy wrote:
I'm deleting most of the discussion, because I think I may be
throwing too many ingredients on the table.
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 14:45:19 -0500, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 08/30/2015 08:18 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 22:21:55 -0500, Ole Ersoy wrote:
I'm deleting most of the discussion, because I think I may be
throwing too many ingredients on the table. For further context
please see the prev
On 08/30/2015 08:18 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 22:21:55 -0500, Ole Ersoy wrote:
I'm deleting most of the discussion, because I think I may be
throwing too many ingredients on the table. For further context
please see the previous thread.
I don't get that. Here the main purp
Changes look non-intrusive and OK for me. I would say bump the apache
super-parent as well.
Would you let us know how you checked the changes? Using the versions
plugin, or diffing the effective poms?
On 27 Aug 2015 13:47, "Bernd Eckenfels" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I plan to release commons-parent, t
Hi.
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 22:21:55 -0500, Ole Ersoy wrote:
I'm deleting most of the discussion, because I think I may be
throwing too many ingredients on the table. For further context
please see the previous thread.
I don't get that. Here the main purpose is to set a hard limit
that will rais
