On 12/20/14 11:35 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>> The question we always ask
>> about new component ideas is can we grow and sustain a community
>> around them.
>
> Couldn't agree more. As you may have noticed, there is a
> community and it's been arguing for years!
>
> >> >We ca
Phil Steitz wrote:
The question we always ask
about new component ideas is can we grow and sustain a community
around them.
Couldn't agree more. As you may have noticed, there is a community and
it's been arguing for years!
>> >We came here originally. We found that there is a Commons way
On 12/20/14 4:28 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apache Commons serves a specific purpose for collaboration amongst
> Apache projects.
Commons is a project itself, too. We have quite a few components
that originated here. We love to encourage collaboration across the
ASF, but that is not our
The Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce the availability of
Apache Commons Configuration 2.0-alpha2.
The Commons Configuration software library provides a generic
configuration interface which enables an application to read
configuration data from a variety of sources.
This is the second a
On 12/19/14 2:09 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we (the Apache Commons Project) don't know the RDF standard or any existing
> implementations. We just provide a possibility for other projects to share
> code. If it is currently not clear how to share RDF library code, or what
> should be i
Hello All,
(this is an resend of the Vote mail, because it was in the
wrong thread)
The Apache Commons Parent POM provides common settings for all Apache
Commons components.
This is a VOTE to release Commons Parent 36-RC1.
This VOTE by LAZY-CONSENSUS is open for at least 72 hours until
Decem
Hello All,
The Apache Commons Parent POM provides common settings for all
Apache Commons components.
This is a VOTE to release Commons Parent 36-RC1.
This VOTE by LAZY-CONSENSUS is open for at least 72 hours until
December 23 17:00 UTC.
Changes in this version include:
Update plugins, fix re
Am Sat, 20 Dec 2014 08:28:45 -0500
schrieb Gary Gregory :
> Feel free to RM commons parent, it only needs a "lazy" VOTE.
Thanks, thats actually a good thing to practice :) I will do that.
BTW: the building.txt misses the released tag, I guess it is a copy of
the RC tag after the repo was release
Feel free to RM commons parent, it only needs a "lazy" VOTE.
Gary
Original message From: Bernd Eckenfels
Date:12/20/2014 07:34 (GMT-05:00)
To: dev@commons.apache.org Cc: Subject:
[parent] announcement profile needs announcementDir parameter
Hello,
When using commons.cha
Hello,
When using commons.changes.version=2.11 like commons-parent 35 is
doing, you need to pass announcementDirectory instead of
outputDirectory. This is required in the release-notes profile.
I have added the change to commons-parent with this commit:
http://svn.apache.org/r1646968
However,
Am Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:35:30 +
schrieb sebb :
> On 20 December 2014 at 01:57, Bernd Eckenfels
> wrote:
> > Am Sat, 20 Dec 2014 02:48:43 +0100
> > schrieb Bernd Eckenfels :
> >
> >>
> >> Bug,New Feature,Task,Improvement,Wish,Test
> >>
> >> So should we add "improvement" here as well
On 20 December 2014 at 01:57, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Am Sat, 20 Dec 2014 02:48:43 +0100
> schrieb Bernd Eckenfels :
>
>>
>> Bug,New Feature,Task,Improvement,Wish,Test
>>
>> So should we add "improvement" here as well?
>
> Sorry I missed the fact it is already added. Any other idea wha
Hi,
Apache Commons serves a specific purpose for collaboration amongst
Apache projects. There is already collaboration between projects in
Apache in the RDF space. We have projects using each others releases
(Clerezza uses Jena; Stanbol use Clerezza and specifically the Jena
providers; we a
The VOTE email needs a link to the KEYS file as this is needed to check sigs.
i.e.
https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
On 19 December 2014 at 15:30, Gilles wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 16:10:55 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>
>> Le 19/12/2014 15:59, Gilles a écrit :
>>>
>>> On Fri, 19 Dec
Hello Gary,
not sure why this has not been fixed before. Anyway, I added one header
and excluded the test files which have only trivial content. I also
made sure the RAT report does not depend on include-sendbox profile.
With this revision the RAT reports now show no unknown licenses anymore:
ht
On 19 December 2014 at 14:51, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:09 AM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 19 December 2014 at 09:17, Thomas Neidhart
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Luc,
>> >
>> > tested the artifacts with java version "1.7.0_71".
>> > Everything looks good, great work.
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
