Thanks for the reminder. I'll switch to 1.2 after it has been released.
Send from my mobile device
> Am 07.07.2014 um 22:38 schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
> Note that 1.2 is about to be released.
>
> Gary
>
> Original message From: brit...@apache.org
> Date:07/07/2014 15:36 (GMT
Good idea, I'll try that later today.
Send from my mobile device
> Am 07.07.2014 um 22:43 schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
> Why not point to maven central?
>
> Gary
>
> Original message From: brit...@apache.org
> Date:07/07/2014 15:41 (GMT-05:00) To:
> comm...@commons.apache.org
This message is about commons logging as the log message reflects.
Gary
Original message From: Paul Benedict
Date:07/07/2014 16:42 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List Cc:
comm...@commons.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r1608572 -
/commons/proper/validator/trunk/po
Why not point to maven central?
Gary
Original message From: brit...@apache.org
Date:07/07/2014 15:41 (GMT-05:00) To:
comm...@commons.apache.org Subject: svn commit: r1608576 -
/commons/proper/validator/trunk/build.xml
Author: britter
Date: Mon Jul 7 19:41:48 2014
New Revi
Gary, 1.2 of what?
Cheers,
Paul
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Note that 1.2 is about to be released.
>
> Gary
>
> Original message From: brit...@apache.org
> Date:07/07/2014 15:36 (GMT-05:00) To:
> comm...@commons.apache.org Subject: svn commit: r160
Note that 1.2 is about to be released.
Gary
Original message From: brit...@apache.org
Date:07/07/2014 15:36 (GMT-05:00) To:
comm...@commons.apache.org Subject: svn commit: r1608572 -
/commons/proper/validator/trunk/pom.xml
Author: britter
Date: Mon Jul 7 19:36:14 2014
New
Any thoughts about this fix? Could be a solution to push out 1.0. If we
come up with a more generic solution afterwards, we can still deprecate
escapeCRLFOnce.
Benedikt
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tillmann Gaida (JIRA)
Date: 2014-06-30 10:36 GMT+02:00
Subject: [jira] [Comment E
Hello Thomas,
thanks for pushing out this RC! I've reviewed this RC using maven 3.2.2
with Oracle JDK 1.8.0_05 and Oracle JDK 1.7.0_60.
- builds fine from sources
- hashes and signs are good
- Reports and site look good
One minor nit: The source archives differ from the tag. It looks like the
va
Hello Thomas,
thanks for working on this release. I've reviewed with maven 3.2.2 using
Oracle JDK 1.8.0_05 and Oracle JDK 1.7.0_60
- builds fine from sources
- source archives have the same content as the tag
- Signs and hashes are good
- Site and reports look good
One minor nit: The RELEASE-NOT
