Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.9-RC1

2013-12-23 Thread Gary Gregory
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 12/20/13, 8:09 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hello All: > > > > This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.9-RC1 > > > > Feature and fix release. Requires a minimum of Java 1.6. > > > > Changes in this version include: > > > > Performance: > >

[VOTE] Release [pool] 2.1 based on RC1

2013-12-23 Thread Phil Steitz
Pool 2.1 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/ Maven artifacts are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-019/ Details of changes since 1.6 are in the release notes: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/co

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC1

2013-12-23 Thread Gary Gregory
Thank you for cutting the RC Benedikt. While the Clirr breakage for FastDateFormat is documented as intentional and 'safe' in the release notes, the first place I looked for information is the Javadoc, IMO the same information from the release notes could be duplicated in the Javadoc. The Javadoc

Re: [site] update to fluido/log4j inspired skin

2013-12-23 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, I've forked your repo, Thomas and tried the skin out. Looks like you've fixed the problems with clear. Can we integrate your work into SVN? Regards, Benedikt 2013/11/10 Benedikt Ritter > Nice to see this moving forward. What is next? Can we integrate the > changes you made in github into

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC1

2013-12-23 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2013/12/23 Oliver Heger > Am 23.12.2013 10:26, schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > > Hello Oilver, > > > > thanks for your review and the suggestions. > > > > > > 2013/12/22 Oliver Heger > > > >> Hi Benedikt, > >> > >> the release notes mention that Lang 3.0 and onwards requires Java 5, > >> while the 3.

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC1

2013-12-23 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 23.12.2013 10:26, schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hello Oilver, > > thanks for your review and the suggestions. > > > 2013/12/22 Oliver Heger > >> Hi Benedikt, >> >> the release notes mention that Lang 3.0 and onwards requires Java 5, >> while the 3.2 release actually needs Java 6. I think this

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC1

2013-12-23 Thread Matt Benson
For my $0.02 I'd say that if the Javadocs are usable it doesn't really matter. :| Matt On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Duncan Jones wrote: > On 23 Dec 2013 18:32, "Matt Benson" wrote: > > > > Bene pointed out to me that he did build w/ Java 7; of course the target > > setting in the POM is

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC1

2013-12-23 Thread Duncan Jones
On 23 Dec 2013 18:32, "Matt Benson" wrote: > > Bene pointed out to me that he did build w/ Java 7; of course the target > setting in the POM is the reason the classfiles are Java 6 compatible, > which is the important thing in any case. Presumably that means the Javadocs have a Java 7 style? Is t

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC1

2013-12-23 Thread Matt Benson
Bene pointed out to me that he did build w/ Java 7; of course the target setting in the POM is the reason the classfiles are Java 6 compatible, which is the important thing in any case. Matt On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Matt Benson wrote: > - RAT report looks okay. > - I successfully buil

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC1

2013-12-23 Thread Matt Benson
- RAT report looks okay. - I successfully build the contents of the source artifacts with both Java 6 and Java 7 - I successfully build the contents of the tag - britter code signing key is in https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/commons/KEYS - All sigs and hashes check out - Binary jars appe

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC1

2013-12-23 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi Jörg, 2013/12/23 Jörg Schaible > > Hi, > > I don't know what it is, but for me the download of > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/lang/source/commons-lang3-3.2-src.tar.gzalways > stops at 71% ... anyone else ?!? > Don't know, works on my machine. I'm using Safari on Mac OS

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC1

2013-12-23 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi, I don't know what it is, but for me the download of https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/lang/source/commons-lang3-3.2-src.tar.gz always stops at 71% ... anyone else ?!? - Jörg Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hello All, > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant en

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.9-RC1

2013-12-23 Thread Jörg Schaible
+1, as usual the StringUtilsTest for Utf16 is failing on IBM JDKs, but apart from that, all other JDKs work properly (incl. Java 8). - Jörg Gary Gregory wrote: > Hello All: > > This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.9-RC1 > > Feature and fix release. Requires a minimum of Java 1.6. > > C

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC1

2013-12-23 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Oilver, thanks for your review and the suggestions. 2013/12/22 Oliver Heger > Hi Benedikt, > > the release notes mention that Lang 3.0 and onwards requires Java 5, > while the 3.2 release actually needs Java 6. I think this has to be > explicitly stated. > Oh, yes! Would probably be bet