Re: Snapshot vs. release sites.

2013-11-06 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2013-11-07, sebb wrote: > On 6 November 2013 15:53, Gary Gregory wrote: >> Hi All: >> I find it unhelpful and confusing at times to see Commons sites for >> -SNAPSHOT version. > +1, it's annoying and unhelpful to have the main site refer to a > version that has not been released. I tend to

RE: [LANG] Release 3.2?

2013-11-06 Thread Gary Gregory
Release early, release often :) Original message From: Henri Yandell Date:11/07/2013 01:13 (GMT-05:00) To: Commons Developers List Subject: [LANG] Release 3.2? I'm thinking we should be rolling a 3.2 release. Any opinions? Hen

[LANG] Release 3.2?

2013-11-06 Thread Henri Yandell
I'm thinking we should be rolling a 3.2 release. Any opinions? Hen

Re: Snapshot vs. release sites.

2013-11-06 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > I find it unhelpful and confusing at times to see Commons sites for > -SNAPSHOT version. > > I'd prefer to be able to browse a whole site for any released version. This > is especially handy when I want to find information for some

[FTP] Exposing the LIST data connection's InputStream

2013-11-06 Thread Jake Sebastian-Jones
Hello all, This is my first interaction with this list. While using FTPClient on an Android application I was developing, I found myself wishing I could attach a CountingInputStream to LIST requests. This was because I was requesting very large file lists on a slow connection. I thought I could

Re: [VOTE] Release Imaging 1.0 from RC5

2013-11-06 Thread sebb
On 6 November 2013 21:25, Andreas Lehmkuehler wrote: > Am 06.11.2013 19:14, schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > >> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Gary Gregory >> wrote: >> >>> Thank you Damjan for cutting another release! >>> >>> In the future, please summarize changes from RC to RC in the VOTE email. >

Re: Snapshot vs. release sites.

2013-11-06 Thread sebb
On 6 November 2013 15:53, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > I find it unhelpful and confusing at times to see Commons sites for > -SNAPSHOT version. +1, it's annoying and unhelpful to have the main site refer to a version that has not been released. > I'd prefer to be able to browse a whole site

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.0 RC4 as 2.0

2013-11-06 Thread Phil Steitz
My +1 below stands, but here is something for the RM (Mark) and others to consider. Following the directions on the main site page, I realized that the change in r 1537253 to break the cyclic dependency between .pool2 and .pool2.impl made my instructions incorrect. I did not fully get the implica

Re: [VOTE] Release Imaging 1.0 from RC5

2013-11-06 Thread Andreas Lehmkuehler
Am 06.11.2013 19:14, schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: Thank you Damjan for cutting another release! In the future, please summarize changes from RC to RC in the VOTE email. The link to the VOTE thread is too much of a hunt to understand what's chan

Re: [VOTE] Release of Commons Collections 4.0 based on RC1

2013-11-06 Thread Oliver Heger
Build works fine with Java 1.5 and 1.7 on Windows 8, artifacts and site look good. The only problem I noted is that the binary distributions do not contain the release notes; the file is only contained in the source distributions. Not sure whether this is a blocker; it would be good to have this.

Re: I need a map for long and double

2013-11-06 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > Serialization of primitive maps is easy to implement since the maps pretty > much just consist of a couple of arrays. Most of the developers involved > will shy away from java serialization or any dependency on some other > framework. > > So

Re: [VOTE] Release Imaging 1.0 from RC5

2013-11-06 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Thank you Damjan for cutting another release! > > In the future, please summarize changes from RC to RC in the VOTE email. > The link to the VOTE thread is too much of a hunt to understand what's > changed. I might as well look at SVN. > > I a

Re: [math] Multithreaded performances

2013-11-06 Thread Phil Steitz
On 11/6/13 9:05 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Great! > > Btw not sure for sirona we oculd use it. One constraint on sirona-core > is to stay self contained. We already shade math3 so shading pool2 too > would start to create a big jar for this need. I'll try to bench > deeper next week too. OK -

Re: I need a map for long and double

2013-11-06 Thread Ted Dunning
Serialization of primitive maps is easy to implement since the maps pretty much just consist of a couple of arrays. Most of the developers involved will shy away from java serialization or any dependency on some other framework. So is that really a show stopper? On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 6:11 AM,

Re: [math] Multithreaded performances

2013-11-06 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Great! Btw not sure for sirona we oculd use it. One constraint on sirona-core is to stay self contained. We already shade math3 so shading pool2 too would start to create a big jar for this need. I'll try to bench deeper next week too. Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibu

Re: [math] Multithreaded performances

2013-11-06 Thread Phil Steitz
On 11/6/13 8:47 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > well pool are based on locks so I'm not sure (it would need deep > benchs on a real app) it does worth it Commons pool2 uses pretty lightweight locking and using a pool of instances achieves the basic objective of reducing contention for the single s

Re: [math] Multithreaded performances

2013-11-06 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
well pool are based on locks so I'm not sure (it would need deep benchs on a real app) it does worth it Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2013/11/6 Phil Steitz :

Re: [math] Multithreaded performances

2013-11-06 Thread Phil Steitz
On 11/5/13 11:26 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hehe, right. > > I looked a bit more today and LongAdder is only a part of the > solution. The stat computation still needs to lock to get acces to > previous values (N -> N+1). Basically the gain wouldn't be as > important as I thought :(. Right, b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.0 RC4 as 2.0

2013-11-06 Thread Phil Steitz
+1 Thanks, Mark! Phil On 11/4/13 4:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > A change to the component id to pool2 required a new RC. The only other > change was some improvements to the Ant build. > > > The Pool 2.0 RC4 is available for review here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/ (r

Snapshot vs. release sites.

2013-11-06 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All: I find it unhelpful and confusing at times to see Commons sites for -SNAPSHOT version. I'd prefer to be able to browse a whole site for any released version. This is especially handy when I want to find information for some older version I must work with through an inherited dependency.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.0 RC4 as 2.0

2013-11-06 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 11/06/2013 03:20 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart > > wrote: > > > >> On 11/05/2013 01:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >>> A change to the component id to pool2 required a new RC. The only other > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.0 RC4 as 2.0

2013-11-06 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 11/06/2013 03:20 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart > wrote: > >> On 11/05/2013 01:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> A change to the component id to pool2 required a new RC. The only other >>> change was some improvements to the Ant build. >>> >>> >>> The Pool

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.0 RC4 as 2.0

2013-11-06 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 11/05/2013 01:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > A change to the component id to pool2 required a new RC. The only other > > change was some improvements to the Ant build. > > > > > > The Pool 2.0 RC4 is available for review here: > > https:

Re: I need a map for long and double

2013-11-06 Thread Gary Gregory
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Thank you all for replying. > > HPPC looks promising and it's Apache 2 licensed. I'll give it a closer > look. > HPPC does not allow for serialization and even says so, odd. Now looking at fastutil... Gary > > Gary > > > On Tue, Nov 5, 201

Re: I need a map for long and double

2013-11-06 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > What about our own dog food? > > http://commons.apache.org/primitives/ > No maps, no generics :( Gary > > Emmanuel > > > Le 06/11/2013 02:39, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > Hi All: > > > > I'm looking for a Map implementation that takes a St

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.0 RC4 as 2.0

2013-11-06 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 11/05/2013 01:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > A change to the component id to pool2 required a new RC. The only other > change was some improvements to the Ant build. > > > The Pool 2.0 RC4 is available for review here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/ (r3419) > > Maven a

Re: [VOTE] Release of Commons Collections 4.0 based on RC1

2013-11-06 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 05/11/2013 14:09, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : > Hi, > > I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Collections 4.0 based on RC1. > > Changes since 4.0-alpha1 (copied from release-notes): > > o [COLLECTIONS-488] Added "CollectionsUtils#matchesAll(Iterable, > Predicate)" to test if all