Hi all,
If there are no objections, I'll start working on this issue (FUNCTOR-24 [1])
and will commit the changes throughout the next days.
Let me know if you have any thoughts on this, please :)
Thanks!
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FUNCTOR-24
Bruno P. Kinoshita
http://kinoshi
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:21 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 15 May 2013 02:58, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > For me 'mvn clean site' took 56 minutes for IO.
>
> So?
>
It's just a data point.
Gary
>
> What if you exclude site-content/** ?
>
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:19 PM, sebb wrote:
On 15 May 2013 02:58, Gary Gregory wrote:
> For me 'mvn clean site' took 56 minutes for IO.
So?
What if you exclude site-content/** ?
> Gary
>
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:19 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> I've just done a test with IO, and the speed problem seems to be
>> related to the SVN files unde
For me 'mvn clean site' took 56 minutes for IO.
Gary
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:19 PM, sebb wrote:
> I've just done a test with IO, and the speed problem seems to be
> related to the SVN files under site-content.
> These seem to cause 0.9 to hang - a thread dump shows the code is
> mainly at th
I've just done a test with IO, and the speed problem seems to be
related to the SVN files under site-content.
These seem to cause 0.9 to hang - a thread dump shows the code is
mainly at the line:
at
org.apache.rat.analysis.license.FullTextMatchingLicense.match(FullTextMatchingLicense.java:79)
Th
Thanks Sebb.
Gary
On May 14, 2013, at 20:18, "s...@apache.org" wrote:
> Author: sebb
> Date: Wed May 15 00:17:48 2013
> New Revision: 1482646
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1482646
> Log:
> Document why we are using RAT 0.8 not 0.9
>
> Modified:
>commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk/pom.xml
On 14 May 2013 22:37, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> +1
>
> since the package name will change, client code has to be changed anyway.
> Now is the time to get rid of all flaws of the old API.
+0
I agree, but the previous behaviour does seem useful.
So if it can be provided in addition to supporting th
Le 14/05/2013 19:30, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
> Everybody is welcome to express his/her opinion on the following options:
>
> [ ] +1 Yeah do this change, it's really time
> [ ] +0 OK great, but we should add a Bag decorator which mimics the
>pre-4.0 behavior
> [ ] -0 Well, I do not use c
As of version 1.2.1, the lower level MultipartStream API has been
deprecated in favor of it's higher level counter part, ServletFileUpload.
However, this is problematic for us as we're not using Servlets, and
instead use finagle/netty to serve our requests. We're using the deprecated
interface for
+1
since the package name will change, client code has to be changed anyway.
Now is the time to get rid of all flaws of the old API.
2013/5/14 Matt Benson
> +0
>
> Matt
>
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Thomas Neidhart <
> thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > On 05/13/2013 08:06 PM
This is a VOTE to release Commons Parent 29 from RC3
Changes in this version include:
Changes:
o cobertura-maven-plugin 2.5.2 -> removed
jacoco-maven-plugin -> 0.6.2.201302030002
maven-surefire-plugin 2.13 -> 2.14.1
maven-su
This vote is cancelled so we can revert apache rat plugin back to 0.8
for its very slow run in some components.
Luc
Le 14/05/2013 14:47, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> Yes, I'll reset RAT to 0.8...
>>
>
> Done.
>
> Gary
>
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> On
On 14 May 2013 18:35, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:00 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 14 May 2013 06:01, wrote:
>>> Author: damjan
>>> Date: Tue May 14 05:01:35 2013
>>> New Revision: 1482203
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1482203
>>> Log:
>>> Verify conformance to the Java 1.
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:00 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 14 May 2013 06:01, wrote:
>> Author: damjan
>> Date: Tue May 14 05:01:35 2013
>> New Revision: 1482203
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1482203
>> Log:
>> Verify conformance to the Java 1.5 API using the animal-sniffer plugin.
>
> -1
>
> Does no
+0
Matt
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 05/13/2013 08:06 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > currently, the Bag interface states that it violates the Collection
> > contract. This is mainly because the interface was defined like that,
> > but could be easil
On 05/13/2013 08:06 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently, the Bag interface states that it violates the Collection
> contract. This is mainly because the interface was defined like that,
> but could be easily changed.
>
> As we are not binary compatible anymore with previous releases, i
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Rodion Efremov <
rodion.efre...@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> The reason I contact you is that I wanted to make sure that I understand
> the process. (Bare with me, as this is the very first time I contact ANY
> open-source community.) Now, is the following procedure ac
Hello all!
I am interested to contribute to Sandbox's Graph library with an
implementation of bidirectional Dijkstra's algorithm.
At this point, these are ready:
- the algo itself as applying*() construct in the
DefaultShortestPathAlgorithmSelector.java,
- unit tests; so far so good,
- perfo
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> The advantage is an API that is cleaner and easier to understand.
>
I changed the methods to be package private.
> As for the name, what about "SmartBeanProcessor" or
> "ImprovedBeanProcessor" (much like the ImprovedNamingStrategy in
>
On 14 May 2013 13:46, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Tue May 14 12:46:53 2013
> New Revision: 1482320
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1482320
> Log:
> Undo: Update to apache-rat-plugin 0.9 from 0.8.
Why was it reverted?
Yes, I know why - but this is not obvious to anyone reading the log late
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Yes, I'll reset RAT to 0.8...
>
Done.
Gary
>
> Gary
>
> On May 14, 2013, at 5:44, luc wrote:
>
> > Le 2013-05-14 08:41, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
> >> On 05/14/2013 07:48 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>> Can someone (Luc) try this CP version
Yes, I'll reset RAT to 0.8...
Gary
On May 14, 2013, at 5:44, luc wrote:
> Le 2013-05-14 08:41, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
>> On 05/14/2013 07:48 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> Can someone (Luc) try this CP version or trunk with commons [IO]. I
>>> was
>>> able to run 'mvn clean site' with M3.0.5 an
On 14 May 2013 06:03, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 7:14 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 12 May 2013 11:12, wrote:
>>> Author: damjan
>>> Date: Sun May 12 10:12:16 2013
>>> New Revision: 1481509
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1481509
>>> Log:
>>> Add support for BZIP2 decompressi
On 14 May 2013 06:01, wrote:
> Author: damjan
> Date: Tue May 14 05:01:35 2013
> New Revision: 1482203
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1482203
> Log:
> Verify conformance to the Java 1.5 API using the animal-sniffer plugin.
-1
Does not appear to work properly on Maven 2.2.1. or Maven 3.0.4.
Alt
2013/5/13 Emmanuel Bourg
> Le 13/05/2013 21:24, William Speirs a écrit :
> >
> > Yes, I did mean QueryExecutor... sorry. I make my methods protected
> rather
> > than private because I'm not sure how someone (maybe myself) will need to
> > change functionality in the future. If I make them privat
Le 2013-05-14 08:41, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
On 05/14/2013 07:48 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Can someone (Luc) try this CP version or trunk with commons [IO]. I
was
able to run 'mvn clean site' with M3.0.5 and Java 7 on Win7 but it
almost
took an hour! As opposed to a couple of minutes with CP 2
26 matches
Mail list logo
