+1 since the package name will change, client code has to be changed anyway. Now is the time to get rid of all flaws of the old API.
2013/5/14 Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> > +0 > > Matt > > > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Thomas Neidhart < > thomas.neidh...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > On 05/13/2013 08:06 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > currently, the Bag interface states that it violates the Collection > > > contract. This is mainly because the interface was defined like that, > > > but could be easily changed. > > > > > > As we are not binary compatible anymore with previous releases, it > would > > > be the right time to do this now (or leave it as it is till the end of > > > time). > > > > > > Any opinions / objections on this? > > > > As there have been some objections against this change, and I *really* > > would like to cut an alpha release soon, I'd like to streamline the > > process. > > > > Everybody is welcome to express his/her opinion on the following options: > > > > [ ] +1 Yeah do this change, it's really time > > [ ] +0 OK great, but we should add a Bag decorator which mimics the > > pre-4.0 behavior > > [ ] -0 Well, I do not use collections and guava is cooler anyways > > [ ] -1 I want to keep the Bag interface as is, but add a Bag decorator > > which makes it conform to the Collection contract > > > > Thanks, > > > > Thomas > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > -- http://people.apache.org/~britter/ http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter http://github.com/britter
