Hi Elijah,
great! :) You can take in consideration to include samples in the
maven reactor, so you can safety inherit the chain2 parent pom and
avoiding repeat stuff, have a look at existing thin pom modules :P
Samples will be anyway excluded from the deployment on Nexus, the
`dist` module contai
Yeah, I would say something like this:
public interface Graph
{
...
}
this is assuming you'd want to enforce the serialization stuff.
Otherwise it'd just be Graph
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi James!
>
> the email was posted twice because looks like you posted to ol
True, the weighted stuff might require an interface, but you could
have a "regular" graph with arbitrary objects representing its edges
and vertices.
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> while it could be true for Vertex, Edge in some case requires
> assumptions,
Hi James!
the email was posted twice because looks like you posted to old
jakarta address :P
The main reason because these interfaces are there, is that when I
started resurrecting it I just opened my Graph book, I started
defining element according to definitions :P
Some already implemented alg
Hi James,
while it could be true for Vertex, Edge in some case requires
assumptions, such as the Weight so a marker interface is required.
Do you have a proposal to modify current codebase?
TIA!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.c
Hi Gilles,
could we make the following additions to the release notes?
New features
MATH-655: framework for iterative linear solvers. Implementation of
two solvers: conjugate gradient, SYMMLQ.
Changes
MATH-677, MATH-743: several changes to the API in the transform package.
Best regards,
Sébastie
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Hi Gilles,
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_0_RC1/NOTICE.txt
states:
Copyright 2001-2010 The Apache Software Foundation
should this not be updated to:
Copyright 2001-2012 The Apache Software Foundation
Best regards,
Dennis
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
Hi Simo,
I saw the changes and they look great! Let's see if I can get you a patch
to get the 2.0 apps examples compiling. They are written to use Java 1.3
and we need to change the pom to support 1.5. I already have some source
changes for them, but I am not done with it.
-Elijah
On Thu, Mar 1,
>
> Hello Sébastien.
>
Hi Gilles,
>> >
>> > >
>> > > * org.apache.commons.math3.linear.SymmLQ: Yet another problem with a
>> > > probably unnecessary "Serializable"...
>> > >
>> > In fact, it comes from a nested class which extends EventObject, so it
>> > must be (unfortunately) serializable. I'
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2012-02-29 19:00, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> As we near the 1.0 release of Sanselan / Apache Commons Imaging, I am
>> having showstopper problems with Maven.
>>
>> The first problem, now fixed, was that "mvn assembly:assembly" f
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-lang3-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Sorry if this was double-posted. I think I accidentally sent it from
my "personal" email account too (which isn't subscribed).
Anyway, shouldn't we just let anything (perhaps restrict it to
Serializables) be a vertex or an edge?
---
On Mar 1, 2012, at 7:59 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I managed to complete part of the release process:
>
> Tag on SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_0_RC1/
>
> Artefacts on Nexus:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecomm
Hi.
I managed to complete part of the release process:
Tag on SVN:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_0_RC1/
Artefacts on Nexus:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-010/
I'm still stuck with the "staged" web site (cf. other post)
Hi.
I'm now trying to figure how to "stage the site". [What does "stage" mean in
this context?]
Reading this
---CUT---
stagingSite
repouser
---CUT---
I wonder:
* Should I replace "repouser" with my login?
* Is the password really optional?
* Can the password be encrypted?
* What sho
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=19566&projectId=75
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 1 Mar 2012 23:22:08 +
Finished at: Thu 1 Mar 2012 23:23:17 +
Total time: 1m 9s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bui
Hello Luc.
> >
> > The version upgrade of the FindBugs plugin led to new discoveries some of
> > which are potentially serious bugs:
> >
> > * org.apache.commons.math3.ode.nonstiff.GraggBulirschStoerIntegrator: Was
> > method "setStepsizeControl" (note the spelling) intended to override
> >
Hello Sébastien.
> >
> > >
> > > * org.apache.commons.math3.linear.SymmLQ: Yet another problem with a
> > > probably unnecessary "Serializable"...
> > >
> > In fact, it comes from a nested class which extends EventObject, so it
> > must be (unfortunately) serializable. I'll look into it.
>
> Th
Ciao Marco,
+DirectedMutableWeightedGraph, Integer> graph =
+newDirectedMutableWeightedGraph( new
AbstractGraphConnection>()
+{
+@Override
+public void connect()
+{
+}
+
+} );
it would be m
Hi,
Added an extra check to prevent
discovering multiple edges that lead to the same (already visited) vertex.
cool stuff, thanks for turning human words into computer words :)
I spent a couple minutes running the tests on max-flow algos with
breakpoints and stuff, and apparently they keep av
On 2012-02-29 19:00, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> As we near the 1.0 release of Sanselan / Apache Commons Imaging, I am
> having showstopper problems with Maven.
>
> The first problem, now fixed, was that "mvn assembly:assembly" failed
> due to the Maven Assembly plugin failing to add a non-A
Am 01.03.2012 20:52, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Hi Bene,
apologize but maybe I expressed myself in the wrong form - I didn't
intend to offend you nor attack at all.
Sorry you got it personally.
you're right, I got that wrong - sorry (it's a bit ironic, since in my
last mail I told you not to wor
great work :-)
--
Marco Speranza
Google Code: http://code.google.com/u/marco.speranza79/
Il giorno 01/mar/2012, alle ore 21:26, Thomas Neidhart ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I have checked in my version of Kosaraju's strongly connected components
> algorithm. It is a first version and I would be glad
Hi,
the version of DatabaseConfiguration in the experimental branch strongly
differs from the trunk version. It uses a template approach for
executing JDBC operations thus avoiding the complex JDBC exception
handling plumbing code.
I prefer this style because IMHO it makes the implementation
:O WOW!
may I can ask you to mark SANDBOX-353 as resolved, please?
Many thanks in advance!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:27 PM, wrote:
> Author: tn
> Date:
Le 01/03/2012 15:16, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Hi.
Hi Gilles,
>
> The version upgrade of the FindBugs plugin led to new discoveries some of
> which are potentially serious bugs:
>
> * org.apache.commons.math3.ode.nonstiff.GraggBulirschStoerIntegrator: Was
> method "setStepsizeControl" (note
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2012-03-01 20:45, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Dennis Lundberg
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2012-03-01 06:23, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Dennis Lundberg
> >> wrote:
> On 2012-
Hi,
I have checked in my version of Kosaraju's strongly connected components
algorithm. It is a first version and I would be glad if someone can do a
review.
The implementation is roughly based on
http://algowiki.net/wiki/index.php?title=Kosaraju%27s_algorithm
but the search has been implemente
On 2012-03-01 20:45, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
>> On 2012-03-01 06:23, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Dennis Lundberg
>> wrote:
On 2012-02-29 19:00, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> As we near the
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2012-03-01 06:23, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>> On 2012-02-29 19:00, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
As we near the 1.0 release of Sanselan / Apache Commons Imaging, I am
Hi Bene,
apologize but maybe I expressed myself in the wrong form - I didn't
intend to offend you nor attack at all.
Sorry you got it personally.
My intention was rather spur you on not accepting rules/guides as they
are. I didn't hide you that IMHO you're a very talented guy - at your
age I wasn
terrific, indeed!!!
very well done!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Marco Speranza wrote:
> Ok great! now works
> thanks you!
>
> --
> Marco Speranza
>
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2012-03-01 06:23, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Dennis Lundberg
> wrote:
> >> On 2012-02-29 19:00, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> As we near the 1.0 release of Sanselan / Apache Commons Imagi
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2012-03-01 06:23, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Dennis Lundberg
> wrote:
> >> On 2012-02-29 19:00, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> As we near the 1.0 release of Sanselan / Apache Commons Imagi
YEAH congrats and thank you! :)
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:39 PM, wrote:
> Author: tn
> Date: Thu Mar 1 17:39:59 2012
> New Revision: 1295694
>
> URL: ht
On 2012-03-01 06:23, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> On 2012-02-29 19:00, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> As we near the 1.0 release of Sanselan / Apache Commons Imaging, I am
>>> having showstopper problems with Maven.
>>>
>>> The first
On 2012-02-29 22:25, sebb wrote:
> On 29 February 2012 21:14, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Can someone please grant me karma @ http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum
>> I'd like to add some missing modules.
>>
>> My account in Continuum is "dennisl" which is backed by my ASF e-mail
>> address.
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=19556&projectId=251
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Thu 1 Mar 2012 19:10:22 +
Finished at: Thu 1 Mar 2012 19:11:00 +
Total time: 37s
Build Trigger: For
Ok great! now works
thanks you!
--
Marco Speranza
Google Code: http://code.google.com/u/marco.speranza79/
Il giorno 01/mar/2012, alle ore 19:32, Thomas Neidhart ha scritto:
> On 03/01/2012 07:06 PM, Marco Speranza wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> I run the test and it seems that the BSF explore twi
On 03/01/2012 07:06 PM, Marco Speranza wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I run the test and it seems that the BSF explore twice the same edge.
>
>
>
> Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.025 sec <<<
> FAILURE!
>
> Results :
>
> Tests in error:
> verifyBreadthFirst
Hi Thomas,
I run the test and it seems that the BSF explore twice the same edge.
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.025 sec <<<
FAILURE!
Results :
Tests in error:
verifyBreadthFirstSearch(org.apache.commons.graph.visit.VisitTestCase): Edge
x <-> y() is
On 03/01/2012 09:10 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi +,
>
> I can report the same test failure:
>
> Failed tests:
> findMaxFlowAndVerify(org.apache.commons.graph.flow.EdmondsKarpTestCase):
> expected:<3> but was:<5>
>
> I just applied trivial modifications without altering the algorithms
> behavio
Hi.
>
> >
> > * org.apache.commons.math3.linear.SymmLQ: Yet another problem with a
> > probably unnecessary "Serializable"...
> >
> In fact, it comes from a nested class which extends EventObject, so it
> must be (unfortunately) serializable. I'll look into it.
Then, it seems that you can defin
Hi Simo,
I don't know, why are reacting that harshly. I think that questioning
why an internal class does not have to obey to the general contract of
equals() is not a sign of lacking "spirit of criticism".
I think adding that check or suppressing a FindBugs complain are both
equally valid (al
Hi Elijah,
this is something needed indeed, thanks *a lot*!!!
I don't know if you checked out updates, I switched to multi-module
project structure, looks like it is complete and I just have to add
the /apps in the modules list.
Thanks for the hard work, all the best!
-Simo
http://people.apache
FYI, I am also updating the examples in the /apps folder.
-Elijah
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Elijah,
>
> no needs to learn docbook, the docbook page you see on svn repo is a
> donation from an old book. Deployed documentation is generated from
> /src/site/xdoc s
> if ( !( obj instanceof AccessibleObjectDescriptor ) )
> {
> return false;
> }
what is the sense? having a situation where AccessibleObjectDescriptor
is compared to a different type object is something that can simply
*never* happen!
AccessibleObjectDescriptor is a *private static* class of th
Hi Gilles,
>
> * org.apache.commons.math3.linear.SymmLQ: Yet another problem with a
> probably unnecessary "Serializable"...
>
In fact, it comes from a nested class which extends EventObject, so it
must be (unfortunately) serializable. I'll look into it.
Sébastien
--
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:09:41PM +, sebb wrote:
> On 1 March 2012 14:01, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:46:33AM +, sebb wrote:
> >> On 29 February 2012 23:04, Gilles Sadowski
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi.
> >> >
> >> > Trying the following command (from the wiki "UsingN
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:58:58PM +, sebb wrote:
> On 1 March 2012 13:12, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +, sebb wrote:
> >> On 1 March 2012 12:19, wrote:
> >> > Author: erans
> >> > Date: Thu Mar 1 12:19:30 2012
> >> > New Revision: 1295533
> >> >
> >> >
On 1 March 2012 14:01, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:46:33AM +, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 February 2012 23:04, Gilles Sadowski
>> wrote:
>> > Hi.
>> >
>> > Trying the following command (from the wiki "UsingNexus" page):
>> >
>> > $ mvn release:prepare -DdryRun=true
>> >
>>
The only thing we have to add is
if ( !( obj instanceof AccessibleObjectDescriptor ) )
{
return false;
}
That will make AccessibleObjectDescritpor.equals() obey to the general
contract of equals (which states, that x.equals(null) has to return
false) and it will fix the FindBugs issue, whi
On 1 March 2012 13:12, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +, sebb wrote:
>> On 1 March 2012 12:19, wrote:
>> > Author: erans
>> > Date: Thu Mar 1 12:19:30 2012
>> > New Revision: 1295533
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1295533&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> >
AccessibleObjectRegistry.AccessibleObjectDescriptor is used internally
only, users don't even know that it exist and it is used only as a key
for the AccessibleObject index.
Does it make sense checking other types, nulls, assignability from
super/subclasses, ... etc?
http://people.apache.org/~simo
Hello.
>
> The version upgrade of the FindBugs plugin led to new discoveries some of
> which are potentially serious bugs:
>
> * org.apache.commons.math3.ode.nonstiff.GraggBulirschStoerIntegrator: Was
> method "setStepsizeControl" (note the spelling) intended to override
> "setStepSizeContro
Hi.
The version upgrade of the FindBugs plugin led to new discoveries some of
which are potentially serious bugs:
* org.apache.commons.math3.ode.nonstiff.GraggBulirschStoerIntegrator: Was
method "setStepsizeControl" (note the spelling) intended to override
"setStepSizeControl" defined in the
Hi,
I just ran the eclipse FindBugs plugin with default configuration on
BeanUtils2 and it pointed me to equals() in
AccessibleObjectRegistry.AccessibleObjectDescriptor, reporting that the
cast in line 535
AccessibleObjectDescriptor other = (AccessibleObjectDescriptor) obj;
is not checked f
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:46:33AM +, sebb wrote:
> On 29 February 2012 23:04, Gilles Sadowski
> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Trying the following command (from the wiki "UsingNexus" page):
> >
> > $ mvn release:prepare -DdryRun=true
> >
> > Getting to the signing step:
> > ---CUT---
> > You need
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +, sebb wrote:
> On 1 March 2012 12:19, wrote:
> > Author: erans
> > Date: Thu Mar 1 12:19:30 2012
> > New Revision: 1295533
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1295533&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Removed files not to be included in CM 3.0.
> >
> > Remo
On 1 March 2012 12:55, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 12:29:45PM +, Continuum@vmbuild wrote:
>> Online report :
>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=19541&projectId=97
>>
>> Build statistics:
>> State: Failed
>> Previous State: Ok
>> Starte
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 12:29:45PM +, Continuum@vmbuild wrote:
> Online report :
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=19541&projectId=97
>
> Build statistics:
> State: Failed
> Previous State: Ok
> Started at: Thu 1 Mar 2012 12:21:37 +
> Finished at: Th
On 1 March 2012 12:19, wrote:
> Author: erans
> Date: Thu Mar 1 12:19:30 2012
> New Revision: 1295533
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1295533&view=rev
> Log:
> Removed files not to be included in CM 3.0.
>
> Removed:
>
> commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/ma
This failure is due to the trunk version being set to 3.0, without the
SNAPSHOT suffix.
Trunk should not be left in non-SNAPSHOT state for any longer than is necessary
[Unless you use the release plugin, it's not necessary at all]
On 1 March 2012 12:29, Continuum@vmbuild wrote:
> Online report :
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=19541&projectId=97
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Thu 1 Mar 2012 12:21:37 +
Finished at: Thu 1 Mar 2012 12:29:34 +
Total time: 7m 57s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
> But I would like to discuss the visitor behavior in general, as I was
> working on a SCC algorithm (Kosaraju), and found it quite difficult to
> implement the recursive traversal using the visitor.
yep, yesterday night I was trying to implementing Kosaraju algo and I found the
same difficulties
Hi +,
I can report the same test failure:
Failed tests:
findMaxFlowAndVerify(org.apache.commons.graph.flow.EdmondsKarpTestCase):
expected:<3> but was:<5>
I just applied trivial modifications without altering the algorithms
behavior, I am sure the fix is under our eyes :)
Thanks all, have a nice
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Marco Speranza wrote:
>
> > In the old BFS implementation, the discoverEdge method in the visitor
> > was even called for nodes that have been already visited, which is not
> > the case anymore. From my understanding the new behavior is correct, or
> > am I missing
73 matches
Mail list logo
