+1 too Oliver, great work!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Oliver Heger
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary,
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Dear all,
>
> If there is no strong objection expressed against this solution in the
> coming days, I will go for the first option (i.e. the pair
> getResidual()/providesResidual()), as it avoids having to define
> tagging interface which I don't think would be very useful.
>
I've now implemented
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Dear all,
I think I've gone through all suggested changes in the package
transform (MATH-677). I've left two tasks (namely 3.1 and 3.3 in this
issue)
- Methods "mdfft" and "verifyDataSet" take an argument of type
"Object" (to allow an argument with an unspecified number of
dimensions).
- For clarit
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Am 30.01.2012 22:37, schrieb Gary Gregory:
>
> Hi Oliver:
>>
>> These header issues are not real blockers (hence my -0). I was hoping to
>> nudge you into fixing these but I also know that cutting another RC can be
>> a pain.
>>
Hi Gary,
Am 30.01.2012 22:37, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hi Oliver:
These header issues are not real blockers (hence my -0). I was hoping to
nudge you into fixing these but I also know that cutting another RC can be
a pain.
My POV is that consistency is important. Why make people spend time
figurin
Hi.
> >
> > I think the opposite: IMHO, as I said above, "Base" is less redundant than
> > "Abstract"; and then, the name indicates that the class is the "root" of
> > the hierarchy for this functionality.
> >
> I also tend to think that Base or Basic is more meaningful, but any
> choice is fine b
Hello,
>
> I think the opposite: IMHO, as I said above, "Base" is less redundant than
> "Abstract"; and then, the name indicates that the class is the "root" of
> the hierarchy for this functionality.
>
I also tend to think that Base or Basic is more meaningful, but any
choice is fine by me.
>
> No
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 04:19:34PM +, sebb wrote:
> On 31 January 2012 16:11, Gilles Sadowski
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 04:05:08PM +0100, Dennis Hendriks wrote:
> >> I may be overlooking something, but isn't
> >> "BaseAbstractUnivariateIntegrator" double, in the sense that "Base"
>
Le 31/01/2012 14:15, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Hi.
Hi Gilles,
>
> In order to resolve issue MATH-707, one last thing could be changed, to make
> the whole "analysis" package self-consistent regarding the class naming
> scheme: "UnivariateRealIntegrator" -> "UnivariateIntegrator"
>
> Also, the
Ciao Marco,
thanks for the reminder, I just applied the patch, see r1238692[1].
Please, for future patch, don't reformat the whole code ;)
Thanks for contributing!
-Simo
[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1238692&view=rev
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejourn
Hi guys,
I just posted on Jira an implementation of Burovka's algorithm
(SANDBOX-348) . It's based on Connectivity algorithm for finding the list
of connected component and it uses an internal list of vertices in order to
reduce the call of the connectivity algorithm.
I'm available for comments
On 31 January 2012 16:11, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 04:05:08PM +0100, Dennis Hendriks wrote:
>> I may be overlooking something, but isn't
>> "BaseAbstractUnivariateIntegrator" double, in the sense that "Base"
>> and "Abstract" both refer to an abstract base class that actual
+1 but no patches from me ATM.
Gary
On Jan 31, 2012, at 9:46, sebb wrote:
> I think it would be worth releasing NET 3.1 - there have been quite a
> few fixes and minor improvements since 3.0.1 was released last June.
>
> There are still a few outstanding bugs of course, but none of them have
>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 04:05:08PM +0100, Dennis Hendriks wrote:
> I may be overlooking something, but isn't
> "BaseAbstractUnivariateIntegrator" double, in the sense that "Base"
> and "Abstract" both refer to an abstract base class that actual
> integrators can derive from? In other words, wouldn'
I may be overlooking something, but isn't
"BaseAbstractUnivariateIntegrator" double, in the sense that "Base" and
"Abstract" both refer to an abstract base class that actual integrators can
derive from? In other words, wouldn't "BaseUnivariateIntegrator" or
"AbstractUnivariateIntegrator" be eno
I think it would be worth releasing NET 3.1 - there have been quite a
few fixes and minor improvements since 3.0.1 was released last June.
There are still a few outstanding bugs of course, but none of them have patches.
I propose to create an RC in the next few days.
Last minute patches anyone?
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> In order to resolve issue MATH-707, one last thing could be changed, to make
> the whole "analysis" package self-consistent regarding the class naming
> scheme: "UnivariateRealIntegrator" -> "UnivariateIntegrator"
>
> Also, the clas
Hello.
>
> I'm currently working on a scripted interface to Commons Math. I support
> both Real and Field (Complex) matrices, and Real and Field (Complex) vectors.
> Checking the size of the matrices is trivial because they both implement
> AnyMatrix which has row and column size getters, bu
Hi.
In order to resolve issue MATH-707, one last thing could be changed, to make
the whole "analysis" package self-consistent regarding the class naming
scheme: "UnivariateRealIntegrator" -> "UnivariateIntegrator"
Also, the class "UnivariateRealIntegratorImpl.java" should be renamed. In
addition
Hi,
I'm currently working on a scripted interface to Commons Math. I support both
Real and Field (Complex) matrices, and Real and Field (Complex) vectors.
Checking the size of the matrices is trivial because they both implement
AnyMatrix which has row and column size getters, but because ther
Hi Simo,
I liked it to have a the interface name as a prefix. But your're right, it's a
violation of KISS. I'll create a patch this evening.
Thanks again to Matt!
Have a nice day, guys ;-)
Benedikt
- Original Message -
From: simonetrip...@apache.org
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Date: 31.0
Hi Benedikt,
why do you have the need of declaring constants in a separate
interface? Isn't the class itself, where they are used, enough?
KISS (keep it simple and straightforward)
-Simo
PS @Matt: thanks a lot once again for the hight valuable feedbacks,
you're a commons-gem!!!
-Simo
http://peo
Hey Matt,
thanks for the suggestion! I like the idea of having those numbers encapsulated
in some sort of data structure. But I don't know if an enum fits the purpose.
Maybe I got you wrong. Can you give a code snippet? Defining an enum for float
values would require to implement a private floa
Hi again,
patch applied, tests run like a charme, see issue resolution for details :)
Thanks!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
>
Hi Marco,
great. I'm going to review the patch right now, let's keep updated!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Marco Speranza
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I
28 matches
Mail list logo
