Hello.
>
> I'm currently working on a scripted interface to Commons Math. I support
> both Real and Field (Complex) matrices, and Real and Field (Complex) vectors.
> Checking the size of the matrices is trivial because they both implement
> AnyMatrix which has row and column size getters, but because there is no
> AnyVector class I have to deal with the two vector types separately. Since
> both RealVector and FieldVector already implement getDimension() it would
> seem trivial to add an AnyVector class with that method.
>
> Is there a reason AnyVector doesn't already exist? If not it would seem a
> worthwhile (and quick) thing to add for 3.0.
-1
I don't mean to argue that this proposal is wrong, just that no new feature
should be added at this point, as we try to get to a long overdue release.
Moreover, there has been recent dicussions over changing the design of the
matrix interface(s); it would be a contradiction to do as if everyone were
statisfied with the current design.
Best,
Gilles
P.S. Of course, you are very welcome to (re-)open the discussions after 3.0
is out.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
