To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-sanselan-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Hi guys : I wanted to add some features to CLI
1) Options iterators , make them generic
2) Add an option for setting ALL options to mandatory.
3) Add an option to add groups, using the addOption api, the same way we
add options.
In any case - would such contirbutions be welcome.. and if so - who
Hi Bill,
did you enable the `rc` profile while releasing?
You can now checkout the tag and launch `mvn site-deploy -P rc` to
deploy the site in that location.
HTH, all the best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
On 21.12.2011 17:41, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
1.5.x ships with tomcat and is used by lots of other production
applications. We need to maintain the ability to patch it.
Tomcat 5.5 (the oldest stable version i can find) uses Java 5:
http:/
On 12/21/11 11:09 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 21/12/2011 16:57, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 12/21/11 9:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Phil Steitz
>> wrote:
> 1.5.x ships with tomcat and is used by
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/12/2011 16:57, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > On 12/21/11 9:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Phil Steitz
> wrote:
> >>> 1.5.x ships with tomcat and is used by lots of other production
> >>> applications.
On 21/12/2011 16:57, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/21/11 9:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> 1.5.x ships with tomcat and is used by lots of other production
>>> applications. We need to maintain the ability to patch it.
>> Tomcat 5.5 (the ol
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:23 PM, William Speirs wrote:
> I was able to get past the SVN authentication issue by providing my
> username and password on the command line like this:
>
> -Dusername=wspeirs -Dpassword=X
>
> However, I was still required to type my password ~10 times during the
>
On 21/12/2011 16:41, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> 1.5.x ships with tomcat and is used by lots of other production
>> applications. We need to maintain the ability to patch it.
>
> Tomcat 5.5 (the oldest stable version i can find) uses Java 5
On 12/21/11 10:37 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/21/11 10:24 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>>
>> Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/21/11 9:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Phil Steitz
wrote:
> 1.5.x ships with tomcat and is used by lots of other
On 12/21/11 10:24 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 12/21/11 9:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Phil Steitz
>>> wrote:
1.5.x ships with tomcat and is used by lots of other production
applications. We need to maintain
Hi Phil,
Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/21/11 9:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Phil Steitz
>> wrote:
>>> 1.5.x ships with tomcat and is used by lots of other production
>>> applications. We need to maintain the ability to patch it.
>> Tomcat 5.5 (the oldest st
I was able to get past the SVN authentication issue by providing my
username and password on the command line like this:
-Dusername=wspeirs -Dpassword=X
However, I was still required to type my password ~10 times during the
upload process. Is there any way around this? I feel like my
settings
I have cut RC1 of DBUTILS, but there the site does not appear to have
been uploaded per the vote template I found here:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases
Site: http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/dbutils/1.5/RC1/site/index.html
Any help would be greatly appreciated...
Bill-
--
On 12/21/11 9:32 AM, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Wed Dec 21 16:32:46 2011
> New Revision: 1221794
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221794&view=rev
> Log:
> Version 1.5.8-SNAPSHOT for any 1.5.x work.
>
> Added:
> commons/proper/pool/branches/1_5_RELEASE/
>
On 12/21/11 9:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> 1.5.x ships with tomcat and is used by lots of other production
>> applications. We need to maintain the ability to patch it.
> Tomcat 5.5 (the oldest stable version i can find) uses Java 5:
>
On 12/21/11 9:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> 1.5.x ships with tomcat and is used by lots of other production
>> applications. We need to maintain the ability to patch it.
> Tomcat 5.5 (the oldest stable version i can find) uses Java 5:
>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> 1.5.x ships with tomcat and is used by lots of other production
> applications. We need to maintain the ability to patch it.
Tomcat 5.5 (the oldest stable version i can find) uses Java 5:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/setup.html
Th
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/21/11 9:14 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I created branches/1_5_RELEASE from trunk before the POOL-208 commits.
> > I expect 1.5.x fixes to be ported there from POOL_1_X.
>
> Please have a look at the actual code bases here. Trunk is
> g
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/21/11 9:10 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > My plan is to port any fixes from 1.5.x releases to 1.6.0 if any or
> > encourage others to do so. I do not plan on touching 1.5.x once 1.6 is
> > out. Because of the binary compatibility of 1.6, I
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
> I had a look and looks good to me, I'll give another review once get home.
> Thanks for driving this!
> -Simo
>
Thank you for pitching in Simo :)
Gary
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejou
On 12/21/11 9:22 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 12/21/11 6:02 AM, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: ggregory
>>> Date: Wed Dec 21 13:02:48 2011
>>> New Revision: 1221703
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221703&view=rev
>>>
On 12/21/11 9:14 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I created branches/1_5_RELEASE from trunk before the POOL-208 commits.
> I expect 1.5.x fixes to be ported there from POOL_1_X.
Please have a look at the actual code bases here. Trunk is
generified, 2.0 code. What I need restored is the old 1_5_X branch
On 12/21/11 9:10 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> My plan is to port any fixes from 1.5.x releases to 1.6.0 if any or
> encourage others to do so. I do not plan on touching 1.5.x once 1.6 is
> out. Because of the binary compatibility of 1.6, I would hope that
> folks would patch 1.6 first and then port to
Hi Gary,
I had a look and looks good to me, I'll give another review once get home.
Thanks for driving this!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Gary Gregory
I created branches/1_5_RELEASE from trunk before the POOL-208 commits.
I expect 1.5.x fixes to be ported there from POOL_1_X. If not I'll
watch for 1.5.x releases and port to 1.6.
Gary
On Dec 21, 2011, at 11:03, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/21/11 6:13 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Hello Generics fan
My plan is to port any fixes from 1.5.x releases to 1.6.0 if any or
encourage others to do so. I do not plan on touching 1.5.x once 1.6 is
out. Because of the binary compatibility of 1.6, I would hope that
folks would patch 1.6 first and then port to 1.5.x if asked by users,
but that's just me. I s
On 12/21/11 6:02 AM, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Wed Dec 21 13:02:48 2011
> New Revision: 1221703
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221703&view=rev
> Log:
> Creating a 1.5.x release branch of trunk.
>
> Added:
> commons/proper/pool/branches/1_5_RELEASE/
>
On 12/21/11 6:13 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hello Generics fan,
>
> Please review and continue on [POOL-208] Support Java 1.5 Generics in
> version 1.x.
>
> The code is in the POOL_1_X branch, cooking up for a 1.6 release very soon.
We need to sort out the branch structure here. I had prepared the
nope, I don't have all that energies :)
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> As stated above, I am -1 for releasing this. I don't think
As stated above, I am -1 for releasing this. I don't think we have
resources to support three release trains in [pool]. Are you
prepared to take on bug fixing / porting, user and dev list support
for this code? Is anyone else?
Phil
On 12/21/11 6:13 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hello Generics fan,
Hi Gary,
I'm checking it out right now, I agree with your path: just add
generics and don't break what is already working ;)
I'll let you know ASAP!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On We
go Gary go! :)
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:03 PM, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Wed Dec 21 13:03:54 2011
> New Revision: 1221705
>
> URL: http://svn.a
Hello Generics fan,
Please review and continue on [POOL-208] Support Java 1.5 Generics in
version 1.x.
The code is in the POOL_1_X branch, cooking up for a 1.6 release very soon.
There are NO code changes in the main code that should affect behavior.
I've only touched code for adding generics.
Le 21/12/2011 13:49, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Sorry, that kind of feels like passing the buck here ;) I wish I could
recall a French equivalent! :)
Yeah that's called "Management" ;)
Emmanuel Bourg
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Le 21/12/2011 13:36, Gary Gregory a écrit :
If you add a unit test, you should make sure it works IMO. Or, you should
@Ignore it.
Sorry I'm not keen to put the dust under the carpet. If there is an
issue it should be visible. I let it to someone more knowledgeable on
color spaces to review i
Le 21/12/2011 13:14, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Let's not forget the obvious: imageio.
That fits in the Java 5 and commons naming nicely. Java 5 provides
javax.imageio, which we should take advantage of if possible.
How far do we want to go with javax.imageio integration? Do we intend to
impleme
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I do, the failure appeared after I moved the tests previously in
> ColorConversions into a proper JUnit test case. I don't think I broke the
> code, so I assume the issue was already there.
>
If you add a unit test, you should make sure it
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > WRT ImageReadException and ImageWriteException
> >
> > Would IOException be better for this?
>
> javax.imageio.IIOException ?
>
> - Jörg
>
I'd rather require as little as possible of the javax.* packages, to make
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2011, at 7:12, sebb wrote:
>
> > I slightly prefer Imaging to Image as well.
> >
> > Could also call it JIL - Java Imaging Library - by analogy with JCS and
> JCI.
> >
> > Commons Image
> > Commons Imaging
> > Commons JIL
> >
> > B
I do, the failure appeared after I moved the tests previously in
ColorConversions into a proper JUnit test case. I don't think I broke
the code, so I assume the issue was already there.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 21/12/2011 13:29, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Does anyone else see this:
junit.framework.Com
Le 21/12/2011 13:11, sebb a écrit :
Could also call it JIL - Java Imaging Library - by analogy with JCS and JCI.
JIL could be confused with JJIL, another Java image processing library:
http://code.google.com/p/jjil
Emmanuel Bourg
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On 21 December 2011 12:04, wrote:
> Author: sebb
> Date: Wed Dec 21 12:04:08 2011
> New Revision: 1221687
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221687&view=rev
> Log:
> Restored IssuesTest.java & MethodExecutor.java from r1211956, i.e. the
> original copy of this tag
>
> Added:
>
> comm
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2011, at 7:12, sebb wrote:
>
>> I slightly prefer Imaging to Image as well.
>>
>> Could also call it JIL - Java Imaging Library - by analogy with JCS and JCI.
>>
>> Commons Image
>> Commons Imaging
>> Commons JIL
>>
>> But I'm not
On 21 December 2011 12:14, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2011, at 7:12, sebb wrote:
>
>> I slightly prefer Imaging to Image as well.
>>
>> Could also call it JIL - Java Imaging Library - by analogy with JCS and JCI.
>>
>> Commons Image
>> Commons Imaging
>> Commons JIL
>>
>> But I'm not sure t
> Let's not forget the obvious: imageio.>> That fits in the Java 5 and commons
> naming nicely. Java 5 provides> javax.imageio, which we should take advantage
> of if possible.>> Gary
nice idea, Gary!!! :)
+1, I like it!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejo
On Dec 21, 2011, at 7:12, sebb wrote:
> I slightly prefer Imaging to Image as well.
>
> Could also call it JIL - Java Imaging Library - by analogy with JCS and JCI.
>
> Commons Image
> Commons Imaging
> Commons JIL
>
> But I'm not sure that's any better than Imaging.
Let's not forget the obvious
I slightly prefer Imaging to Image as well.
Could also call it JIL - Java Imaging Library - by analogy with JCS and JCI.
Commons Image
Commons Imaging
Commons JIL
But I'm not sure that's any better than Imaging.
On 21 December 2011 03:04, James Carman wrote:
> +1 for commons-imaging
> On Dec 1
On Dec 21, 2011, at 3:28, "Jörg Schaible" wrote:
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> WRT ImageReadException and ImageWriteException
>>
>> Would IOException be better for this?
>
> javax.imageio.IIOException ?
Or that one too.
Gary
>
> - Jörg
>
>
> ---
On 21 December 2011 11:27, sebb wrote:
> On 21 December 2011 05:40, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2011/12/17 sebb :
>>> On 16 December 2011 13:33, sebb wrote:
On 16 December 2011 12:19, henrib wrote:
> I probably used manual editing, otherwise it would be properly reverted...
> If y
On 21 December 2011 05:40, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/12/17 sebb :
>> On 16 December 2011 13:33, sebb wrote:
>>> On 16 December 2011 12:19, henrib wrote:
I probably used manual editing, otherwise it would be properly reverted...
If you have the svn command on top of your head to
The Tomcat project is cleaning up Gump and removing old, unsupported
Tomcat versions (that also probably have security vulnerabilities).
JCS currently has an optional dependency on jakarta-tomcat (Tomcat
3.3.x). Since I will be removing jakarta-tomcat from Gump, I intend to
remove the optional dep
No problem. Mistakes happen. Thanks for fixing it.
Dennis
Van: Phil Steitz [phil.ste...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: woensdag 21 december 2011 1:29
Aan: Commons Developers List
Onderwerp: Re: svn commit: r1221490 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk/src:
main/java/o
sebb wrote:
> On 20 December 2011 14:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
[snip]
> That would be contrary to the Commons versioning rules - a package
> name change requires a major version bump.
>
>> For 1.0, we should make all big changes before 1.0, which may feel
>> like a big bang release. Anything th
Gary Gregory wrote:
> WRT ImageReadException and ImageWriteException
>
> Would IOException be better for this?
javax.imageio.IIOException ?
- Jörg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional co
57 matches
Mail list logo
