I created branches/1_5_RELEASE from trunk before the POOL-208 commits. I expect 1.5.x fixes to be ported there from POOL_1_X. If not I'll watch for 1.5.x releases and port to 1.6.
Gary On Dec 21, 2011, at 11:03, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/21/11 6:13 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> Hello Generics fan, >> >> Please review and continue on [POOL-208] Support Java 1.5 Generics in >> version 1.x. >> >> The code is in the POOL_1_X branch, cooking up for a 1.6 release very soon. > > We need to sort out the branch structure here. I had prepared the > 1_X branch for 1.5.8. Did you take a copy of that branch and move > it somewhere? The website was published from that branch. Please > fix this. > > Phil >> >> There are NO code changes in the main code that should affect behavior. >> I've only touched code for adding generics. >> >> As we all know, this is binary compatible with 1.5.x because of type >> erasure. >> >> I have changed some of the tests because 100% source compatibility is not >> possible. >> >> APIs that I could not fully generify are: >> >> - org.apache.commons.pool.PoolUtils.adapt(KeyedObjectPool<Object, V>, >> Object) >> - >> org.apache.commons.pool.PoolUtils.adapt(KeyedPoolableObjectFactory<Object, >> V>) >> >> Please dig in and help to make Pool1 with generics the best it can be for >> 1.6. >> >> My goal is to ONLY change code for Generics. >> >> Other kind of fiddling like enhanced for-loops will make it harder to port >> fixes to and from 1.5.x. >> >> If you like enhanced for-loops or other Java 5 features, I won't stop you, >> but it is not my goal here. >> >> Thank you, >> Gary >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
