On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:54 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> > On 16 December 2011 20:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:43 PM, sebb wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 16 December 2011 17:27, Simone Tripodi
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > AH yes, that
2011/12/16 Łukasz Lenart :
> 2011/12/14 Christian Grobmeier :
>> cool, thanks for the update. If you run out of time for some reason or
>> see any other problems with the import, pls let me/us know. I gladly
>> dedicate the cmd-c/cmd-v operations of the next days to ognl.
>
> I finished the work an
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
On 16 December 2011 23:35, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:54 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 16 December 2011 20:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:43 PM, sebb wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 16 December 2011 17:27, Simone Tripodi
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > AH yes, that's because S
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:54 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 December 2011 20:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:43 PM, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 16 December 2011 17:27, Simone Tripodi
> >> wrote:
> >> > AH yes, that's because Sanselan came from the Incubator and hasn't
> >> > been up
On 16 December 2011 13:33, sebb wrote:
> On 16 December 2011 12:19, henrib wrote:
>> I probably used manual editing, otherwise it would be properly reverted...
>> If you have the svn command on top of your head to revert to the initial RC3
>> version, please send it; I'd rather not f...up again -
On 16 December 2011 20:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:43 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 16 December 2011 17:27, Simone Tripodi
>> wrote:
>> > AH yes, that's because Sanselan came from the Incubator and hasn't
>> > been updated yet :P
>>
>> Yes - that's good (as it happens).
>>
>> T
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:43 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 December 2011 17:27, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
> > AH yes, that's because Sanselan came from the Incubator and hasn't
> > been updated yet :P
>
> Yes - that's good (as it happens).
>
> The previous (incubator) Maven release was under the groupId
On 16 December 2011 18:43, sebb wrote:
> On 16 December 2011 17:27, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> AH yes, that's because Sanselan came from the Incubator and hasn't
>> been updated yet :P
>
> Yes - that's good (as it happens).
>
> The previous (incubator) Maven release was under the groupId
> org.apac
On 16 December 2011 17:27, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> AH yes, that's because Sanselan came from the Incubator and hasn't
> been updated yet :P
Yes - that's good (as it happens).
The previous (incubator) Maven release was under the groupId
org.apache.sanselan, and the package was also o.a.sanselan
AH yes, that's because Sanselan came from the Incubator and hasn't
been updated yet :P
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> It looks like the first thing that should happen before a 1.0 is a
> repackage under o.a.c.
>
> Gary
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simon
2011/12/14 Christian Grobmeier :
> cool, thanks for the update. If you run out of time for some reason or
> see any other problems with the import, pls let me/us know. I gladly
> dedicate the cmd-c/cmd-v operations of the next days to ognl.
I finished the work and I'm running copy of OpenSypmhony
It looks like the first thing that should happen before a 1.0 is a
repackage under o.a.c.
Gary
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:28 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 16 December 2011 15:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > Shouldn't we update the code to Java 5 a
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:28 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 December 2011 15:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Shouldn't we update the code to Java 5 at least before a release? So
> > that it looks and feels modern? The commons-io dep could be updated
> > then too. Same for JUnit.
>
> Updating to Java 1.5 p
On 16 December 2011 15:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Shouldn't we update the code to Java 5 at least before a release? So
> that it looks and feels modern? The commons-io dep could be updated
> then too. Same for JUnit.
Updating to Java 1.5 properly is a lot of work, but if there are
people willing t
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Shouldn't we update the code to Java 5 at least before a release? So
> that it looks and feels modern? The commons-io dep could be updated
> then too. Same for JUnit.
>
+1
> Gary
>
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simo
Shouldn't we update the code to Java 5 at least before a release? So
that it looks and feels modern? The commons-io dep could be updated
then too. Same for JUnit.
Gary
On Dec 16, 2011, at 5:30, sebb wrote:
> On 16 December 2011 06:27, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>> Thank you, this seems like what
On 16 December 2011 12:19, henrib wrote:
> I probably used manual editing, otherwise it would be properly reverted...
> If you have the svn command on top of your head to revert to the initial RC3
> version, please send it; I'd rather not f...up again - even better, apply it
> if you still can. :-
I probably used manual editing, otherwise it would be properly reverted...
If you have the svn command on top of your head to revert to the initial RC3
version, please send it; I'd rather not f...up again - even better, apply it
if you still can. :-)
Thanks
PS: What about 2.1.1, do you or do I ?
Hello.
> I'm still working on MATH-677, and would like to remove the
> IllegalArgumentExceptions thrown if the length of the data set is not
> a power of two. I was simply considering throwing
> MathIllegalArgumentException, but this is discouraged in the Javadoc.
> Can I break this rule, or shoul
On 16 December 2011 07:09, wrote:
> Author: henrib
> Date: Fri Dec 16 07:08:59 2011
> New Revision: 1215050
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1215050&view=rev
> Log:
> Unfix for JEXL-124, not supposed to happen on RC3 tag!
Did you revert by manual editting? Or using SVN commands?
The ch
On 16 December 2011 06:27, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Thank you, this seems like what I needed. It turns out gpg-agent has to be
> used to sign.
>
> Unfortunately the Internet bandwidth required to upload all the files is
> vast, so a Sanselan release is probably only going to happen in January.
P
On 16 December 2011 07:26, henrib wrote:
> Should not commit that late...
> Reverted RC3, applied fix on 2.0 branch.
> Thanks for catching this!
I always use http: rather than https: when checking out tags - avoids accidents.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-commons.680414.n
24 matches
Mail list logo
