To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 5/13/11 12:05 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Fri May 13 19:05:20 2011
> New Revision: 1102868
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1102868&view=rev
> Log:
> Add the ability to register an interest in a key to prevent the associated
> ObjectDeque being removed from unde
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 14 May 2011 00:55, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Fri May 13 23:55:05 2011
> New Revision: 1102928
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1102928&view=rev
> Log:
> HashSet is more than enough to check reserved words
>
> Modified:
> incubator/ognl/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/co
Thanks very much to all who voted!
The voting was as follows:
Luc Maisonobe +1 (*)
Gary Gregory +1 (*)
Oliver Heger +1 (*)
Sebastian Bazley +1 (*)
Joerg Schaible +1 (*)
Phil Steitz +1 (*)
There were 5 +1 votes (all binding) and no others, so the vote passes.
I see this now in GOP javadoc for numActive.
* The combined count of the currently active objects and those in the
* process of being created. Under load, it may exceed {@link
#_maxActive}
* but there will never be more than {@link #_maxActive} created
at any one
* time.
[performa
On 5/13/11 6:50 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
>> On 10 May 2011 15:13, sebb wrote:
>>> This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.0 based on RC1.
>>>
>>> [X] +1 release it
>>> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
>>> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because...
>>>
>>> tag: http://svn.apache.org
Hi,
IMHO it would be cleaner code to write
v.multipy(m).someotherCalculations() instead (the current
implementation) m.preMultiply(v)..someotherCalculations().
The execution order goes now strict from left to right...
Arne
-
On 5/13/11 3:20 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/05/2011 07:25, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>>> I saw this
>>> Failed tests:
>>>
>>> testMaxTotalInvariant(org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool):
>>> Thread failed: 2
>>> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Returne
sebb wrote:
> On 10 May 2011 15:13, sebb wrote:
>> This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.0 based on RC1.
>>
>> [X] +1 release it
>> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
>> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because...
>>
>> tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_3_0_RC1/
>> (
On 10 May 2011 15:13, sebb wrote:
> This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.0 based on RC1.
>
> [X] +1 release it
> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because...
>
> tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_3_0_RC1/
> (r1101459)
>
> site: htt
I have committed something more 'fingers saving" :-)
mvn site -DskipReports
btw as some reports are declared in commons-parent some are still used.
2011/5/13 sebb :
> On 13 May 2011 08:30, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I wonder if we could move most of those reporting plugins to a profile
>> It is - that is the jsr199 compiler that needs to be finished.
>> It would be great to finish that and not look back.
>> Although I made some progress I don't think I have the time.
>
> AFAICT, JSR199 also requires Java 1.6?
Indeed. But I am quite positive very few people (if any) use the javac
Sorry, overlooked the noun :P
Nice example, good Italian! :D
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:49 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 May 2011 11:42, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> done, thanks for reviewing!
>
> You seem to have left out the noun "
On 13 May 2011 11:42, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> done, thanks for reviewing!
You seem to have left out the noun "library" from both fixes, so OGNL
is still being used as an adjective.
"library" is the noun which turns OGNL into an adjective.
c.f.
La bella
La bella ragazza
;-)
> Simo
>
> http://
done, thanks for reviewing!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:29 PM, sebb wrote:
> For trademark purposes, component names need to be used as adjectives,
> not nouns.
>
> So I suggest:
>
> Apache Commons OGNL is a Java development f
Eclipse reports quite a lot of Javadoc errors, for example
Javadoc: WHEN_EXHAUSTED_BLOCK cannot be resolved or is not a field
This is because the field is now an enum.
Likewise in LinkedBlockingDeque
Javadoc: Unexpected tag
is generated for all the Javadoc of the form:
* @throws IllegalS
On 13/05/2011 11:20, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/05/2011 07:25, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>>> I saw this
>>> Failed tests:
>>>
>>> testMaxTotalInvariant(org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool):
>>> Thread failed: 2
>>> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Return
For trademark purposes, component names need to be used as adjectives,
not nouns.
So I suggest:
Apache Commons OGNL is a Java development framework ...
is changed to something like:
The Apache Commons OGNL library is a Java development framework ...
On 13 May 2011 11:09, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>>> We really need to drop the javac support. It was a hack. But releasing
>>> it as is will be a bit of a pain as it depends on an old jvm to just
>>> pass the tests.
>>
>> Is it really not possible to implement javac support with a more recent JVM?
>
>
On 13/05/2011 07:25, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> I saw this
>> Failed tests:
>>
>> testMaxTotalInvariant(org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool):
>> Thread failed: 2
>> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Returned object not currently part
>> of this pool
>>
Bonjour Olivier!
I don't even know what this plugin does :) feel free to drop it in
favor of something closer to our needs!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
> I wonder why we need this repository
>> We really need to drop the javac support. It was a hack. But releasing
>> it as is will be a bit of a pain as it depends on an old jvm to just
>> pass the tests.
>
> Is it really not possible to implement javac support with a more recent JVM?
It is - that is the jsr199 compiler that needs to be
2011/5/13 Simone Tripodi
> Hi all guys,
> while fixing the reporting, re-enabling the commented report plugins,
> I got this error:
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.0-beta-3:site
> (default-site) on project commons-ognl: Error during page generatio
2011/5/13 Simone Tripodi :
> Hi all guys,
> while fixing the reporting, re-enabling the commented report plugins,
> I got this error:
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.0-beta-3:site
> (default-site) on project commons-ognl: Error during page generatio
yes, it fails also using maven2:
[INFO] Error during page generation
Embedded error: Error rendering Maven report: error while invoking generate
Unable to instantiate TabCharacterCheck
any hint? many thanks in advance!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On F
didn't try it yet, going it now!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:58 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 May 2011 10:55, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> while fixing the reporting, re-enabling the commented report plugins,
>> I got t
On 13 May 2011 10:55, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> while fixing the reporting, re-enabling the commented report plugins,
> I got this error:
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.0-beta-3:site
> (default-site) on project commons-ognl: Error dur
On 13 May 2011 08:30, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
> I wonder if we could move most of those reporting plugins to a profile
> called reporting.
> When working on documentation, the site generation is long for only a
> typo fix :-).
I use the following command:
mvn site -DskipTests -Dmaven.javado
Hi all guys,
while fixing the reporting, re-enabling the commented report plugins,
I got this error:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.0-beta-3:site
(default-site) on project commons-ognl: Error during page generation:
Error rendering Maven report: Failed
On 13 May 2011 08:47, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> Hm ... going through the issues.
>
> We really need to drop the javac support. It was a hack. But releasing
> it as is will be a bit of a pain as it depends on an old jvm to just
> pass the tests.
Is it really not possible to implement javac support wi
Hello,
I wonder why we need this repository, is it mandatory ?
Perso don't like to see that :
http://mc-repo.googlecode.com/svn/maven2/releases/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-idea-plugin/
:-)
I imagine some issues if the guy push here some other "hackish" maven plugins.
2011/5/13 :
> Author:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8283&projectId=108
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Fri 13 May 2011 09:22:18 +
Finished at: Fri 13 May 2011 09:24:03 +
Total time: 1m 44s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Buil
Ack; sorry. Juggling a baby.
So how do we relicense Luke's contributions from BSD to AL 2.0?
Hen
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> 2011/5/13 Henri Yandell
>
>> So how do we relicense Drew's contributions from BSD to AL 2.0?
>>
>
> Henri probably in this sentence you m
Hm ... going through the issues.
We really need to drop the javac support. It was a hack. But releasing
it as is will be a bit of a pain as it depends on an old jvm to just
pass the tests.
Maybe we should shoot for a 2.0 after all and clean things up. *sigh*
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 09:06, Torsten
2011/5/13 Henri Yandell
> So how do we relicense Drew's contributions from BSD to AL 2.0?
>
Henri probably in this sentence you mistook Drew with Luke. Drew signed a
software grant, so now the code is Apache's.
Antonio
Fine by me. :)
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
> I wonder if we could move most of those reporting plugins to a profile
> called reporting.
> When working on documentation, the site generation is long for only a
> typo fix :-).
> Btw the use of the reporting must be
Hello,
I wonder if we could move most of those reporting plugins to a profile
called reporting.
When working on documentation, the site generation is long for only a
typo fix :-).
Btw the use of the reporting must be use/mandatory when pushing a release.
FYI I have setup a sonar analysis which con
So how do we relicense Drew's contributions from BSD to AL 2.0?
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> I wasn't able to reach Luke, AFAIK he's super busy (he works at Google) :(
> I would have loved to learn something from him!
> At least we have Drew in the PPMC. we're waiting
I wasn't able to reach Luke, AFAIK he's super busy (he works at Google) :(
I would have loved to learn something from him!
At least we have Drew in the PPMC. we're waiting for root@ for
creating the account for him.
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Ma
Thanks for checking, Christian.
> I have moved my code base from my old version of jci 1.1 to the trunk and
> everything looks good. I did have trouble building the trunk, because the
> fam module is not included in the module list. I have opened JCI-66 to
> address that. I will take a look
41 matches
Mail list logo
