Hm ... going through the issues. We really need to drop the javac support. It was a hack. But releasing it as is will be a bit of a pain as it depends on an old jvm to just pass the tests. Maybe we should shoot for a 2.0 after all and clean things up. *sigh*
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 09:06, Torsten Curdt <tcu...@vafer.org> wrote: > Thanks for checking, Christian. > >> I have moved my code base from my old version of jci 1.1 to the trunk and >> everything looks good. I did have trouble building the trunk, because the >> fam module is not included in the module list. I have opened JCI-66 to >> address that. I will take a look at 1.0/1.1 compatibility later this week. > > Just wondering - do you require 1.4 compatibility? I would like to > move to 1.5. Not sure this is the right time for that though. > > cheers, > Torsten > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
