2010/9/30 sebb :
> On 30 September 2010 02:58, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:46 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> Just wondering if the Tailer API could be simplified by performing the
>>> thread start within the class?
>>> Is it ever going to be useful to have direct access to tailer thr
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "LocalBadContent" page has been changed by sebbapache.
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/LocalBadContent?action=diff&rev1=6&rev2=7
--
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "UserPreferences" page has been changed by sebbapache.
The comment on this change is: Add ACL to prevent further spam.
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UserPreferences?action=diff&rev
Dear wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page "Commons Wiki" for change notification.
The page UserPreferences has been reverted to revision 4 by sebbapache.
The comment on this change is: spam.
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UserPreferences?action=diff&rev1=6&rev2=7
---
On 30 September 2010 02:58, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:46 AM, sebb wrote:
>> Just wondering if the Tailer API could be simplified by performing the
>> thread start within the class?
>> Is it ever going to be useful to have direct access to tailer thread?
>> I suspect not,
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:46 AM, sebb wrote:
> Just wondering if the Tailer API could be simplified by performing the
> thread start within the class?
> Is it ever going to be useful to have direct access to tailer thread?
> I suspect not, as the Listener should provide sufficient access.
>
> It's
Just wondering if the Tailer API could be simplified by performing the
thread start within the class?
Is it ever going to be useful to have direct access to tailer thread?
I suspect not, as the Listener should provide sufficient access.
It's not safe to start a thread in the constructor (unless th
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=684&projectId=83
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 29 Sep 2010 22:20:31 +
Finished at: Wed 29 Sep 2010 22:23:19 +
Total time: 2m 47s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bu
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=683&projectId=83
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 29 Sep 2010 21:20:31 +
Finished at: Wed 29 Sep 2010 21:23:20 +
Total time: 2m 49s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bu
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=681&projectId=83
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 29 Sep 2010 20:20:39 +
Finished at: Wed 29 Sep 2010 20:23:21 +
Total time: 2m 42s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bu
Hi,
i would like to do that :
and be able to get what's is inside the CDATA balise from this :
public class protocol implements Invoker {
public void invoke(String source, Map params) throws InvokerException {
}
it seems that params only works with that
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=680&projectId=83
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 29 Sep 2010 19:20:28 +
Finished at: Wed 29 Sep 2010 19:23:04 +
Total time: 2m 35s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bu
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=679&projectId=83
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 29 Sep 2010 18:21:07 +
Finished at: Wed 29 Sep 2010 18:24:50 +
Total time: 3m 42s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bu
On 29 September 2010 18:31, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:39 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 September 2010 12:28, wrote:
>>> Author: niallp
>>> Date: Wed Sep 29 11:28:11 2010
>>> New Revision: 1002582
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1002582&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> IO-
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "UserPreferences" page has been changed by justinbieber.
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UserPreferences?action=diff&rev1=5&rev2=6
--
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "UserPreferences" page has been changed by justinbieber.
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UserPreferences?action=diff&rev1=4&rev2=5
--
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:39 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 September 2010 12:28, wrote:
>> Author: niallp
>> Date: Wed Sep 29 11:28:11 2010
>> New Revision: 1002582
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1002582&view=rev
>> Log:
>> IO-246 FilenameUtils - wildcardMatch gives incorrect results - th
On 29 September 2010 12:28, wrote:
> Author: niallp
> Date: Wed Sep 29 11:28:11 2010
> New Revision: 1002582
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1002582&view=rev
> Log:
> IO-246 FilenameUtils - wildcardMatch gives incorrect results - thanks to wa
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/io/trunk/s
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=678&projectId=83
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 29 Sep 2010 16:20:35 +
Finished at: Wed 29 Sep 2010 16:22:04 +
Total time: 1m 29s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bu
Hi,
2010/9/29 Gilles Sadowski :
>> >> Just to be sure: You propose to remove
>> >> public void setDistribution(TDistribution value)
>> >> Is this correct?
>> >
>> > Yes.
>> >
>> >> If so, another proposal - I'm not sure it's a clever one - is
>> >>
>> >> ---CUT---
>> >> public TDistribution se
> >> Just to be sure: You propose to remove
> >> public void setDistribution(TDistribution value)
> >> Is this correct?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> >> If so, another proposal - I'm not sure it's a clever one - is
> >>
> >> ---CUT---
> >> public TDistribution setDistribution(TDistribution value) {
> >>
Hi,
2010/9/29 Gilles Sadowski :
>> Just to be sure: You propose to remove
>> public void setDistribution(TDistribution value)
>> Is this correct?
>
> Yes.
>
>> If so, another proposal - I'm not sure it's a clever one - is
>>
>> ---CUT---
>> public TDistribution setDistribution(TDistribution va
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=677&projectId=83
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Wed 29 Sep 2010 12:20:50 +
Finished at: Wed 29 Sep 2010 12:23:58 +
Total time: 3m 7s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build N
> Just to be sure: You propose to remove
> public void setDistribution(TDistribution value)
> Is this correct?
Yes.
> If so, another proposal - I'm not sure it's a clever one - is
>
> ---CUT---
> public TDistribution setDistribution(TDistribution value) {
> double n = value.getDegree
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration.
This is
Hi,
Just to be sure: You propose to remove
public void setDistribution(TDistribution value)
Is this correct?
If so, another proposal - I'm not sure it's a clever one - is
---CUT---
public TDistribution setDistribution(TDistribution value) {
double n = value.getDegreesOfFreedom();
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi.
While making the distribution classes immutable, I'm encountering a problem.
In class "SimpleRegression" (package "stat.regression"), there is (at line
140):
---CUT---
if (n > 2) {
distribution.setDegreesOfFreedom(n - 2);
}
---CUT---
and, similarly, in class "TTestI
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
Thanks!
Will try your README for next mod_jk or Web Server releases.
Regards,
Rainer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
33 matches
Mail list logo
