Re: [SCXML]Eclipse plunge-in based visual editor,debugger and code generation tool for SCXML

It can be taken as a Eclipse plunge-in, but i think if i hole it as a open source project under SCXML, it is more reasonable 2010/3/31 Jacob Beard > No takers at Eclipse? > > Jake > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:42 AM, xunlong gui wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >> I have been using Apache Commons SC

RESULT: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

This vote has passed with +1 votes from Luc Maisonobe * Niall Pemberton * Henri Yandell * Bill Barker * Jörg Schaible * Sebastian Bazley * Phil Steitz * Dimitri Pourbaix Michael Heuer and no other votes. Thanks to all who helped prepare, review and improve this release! Phil * = Commons PMC -

[SCXML]Eclipse plunge-in based visual editor,debugger and code generation tool for SCXML

Hi all, I have been using Apache Commons SCXML Engine for more than two years,Now i have an idea to improve it, and I wanted to post it and see if there would be any interest in it in the Apache SCXML community. If possible, i want to hold it as a GSoC(url:http://socghop.appspot.com/

Eclipse plunge-in based visual editor,debugger and code generation tool for SCXML

Hi all, I have been using Apache Commons SCXML Engine for more than two years,Now i have an idea to improve it, and I wanted to post it and see if there would be any interest in it in the Apache SCXML community. If possible, i want to hold it as a GSoC(url:http://socghop.appspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

> Tag: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/ > > Distributions: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/ > > Maven artifacts: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/maven/ > > Documentation bundled with the binary distribution: > http://people.

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/ Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/ Maven artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/maven/ Documentation bundled with the binary distribution: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jexl (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jexl has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Phil Steitz wrote: > Tag: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/ > > Distributions: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/ > > Maven artifacts: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/maven/ > > Documentation bundled with the binary distribut

[codec][lang] Provide a test jar

I am starting with codec and lang since it what I am most interested in ATM... I would like to run commons.xxx unit tests as part of my build as a sanity check when I try out a new combo of JVM, OS, jars, etc. Right now, I would have to compile the unit tests as part of my build which is not gr

[NET] 2.0 Change to nntp classes - using int instead of long for article ids

The fix for NET-276 involved public API changes so is not appropriate for a minor release. NNTPClient#retrieveArticleInfo(int,int) was changed to NNTPClient#retrieveArticleInfo(long, long) That can easily be fixed by adding the old method and deprecating it. There are also some changes to Newsgr

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons Pool -

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=313037&projectId=116 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Tue 30 Mar 2010 16:41:28 -0700 Finished at: Tue 30 Mar 2010 16:44:35 -0700 Total time: 3m 7s Build Trigger: Schedule Bui

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons IO -

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=313033&projectId=155 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Tue 30 Mar 2010 16:30:07 -0700 Finished at: Tue 30 Mar 2010 16:34:24 -0700 Total time: 4m 17s Build Trigger: Schedule Bu

[NET] 2.0 Change to Threadable#thread API

Clirr reports: Parameter 1 of 'public org.apache.commons.net.nntp.Threadable thread(org.apache.commons.net.nntp.Threadable[])' has changed its type to java.util.List It looks like this may have been an accidental change; it was committed as part of r761877 whose log message is: * Improve handli

Re: Staging/publishing procedure and tools

sebb wrote: > On 29/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:40 PM, henrib wrote: >> > >> > >> > I've used the http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases procedure to >> > release JEXL-2.0 (from Windows, not working on Unix/Mac) and I'm trying to >> > reuse it for JE

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons BeanUtils -

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=313023&projectId=156 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Tue 30 Mar 2010 15:58:14 -0700 Finished at: Tue 30 Mar 2010 16:01:47 -0700 Total time: 3m 32s Build Trigger: Schedule

Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0.1

On 30/03/2010, henrib wrote: > > Tag: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jexl/tags/COMMONS_JEXL_2_0_1-RC1 RAT and property check looks OK. > Site: > http://people.apache.org/~henrib/jexl-2.0.1-RC1/site/index.html Main page still refers to 2.0 in body and LHS menus. Releas

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

On 30/03/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > Luc Maisonobe wrote: > > Jörg Schaible a écrit : > >> Hi Dimitri, > >> > >> Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > I checked one of the tests and I assume that all of the above are JUnit > 4.x tests ...? My Ant/lib contains only JUnit

Re: Staging/publishing procedure and tools

On 29/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:40 PM, henrib wrote: > > > > > > I've used the http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases procedure to > > release JEXL-2.0 (from Windows, not working on Unix/Mac) and I'm trying to > > reuse it for JEXL-2.0.1. > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Jörg Schaible a écrit : >> Hi Dimitri, >> >> Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I checked one of the tests and I assume that all of the above are JUnit 4.x tests ...? My Ant/lib contains only JUnit 3.8.x. Should JUnit 4.x be provided with the build or with

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Jörg Schaible a écrit : > Hi Dimitri, > > Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> I checked one of the tests and I assume that all of the above are JUnit >>> 4.x tests ...? My Ant/lib contains only JUnit 3.8.x. Should JUnit 4.x be >>> provided with the build or with Ant? >> When I was updating SV

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: > Jorg, > >> With Ant 1.7.0 all tests pass for me also. It seems that Ant 1.6.5 simply >> does not yet support JUnit 4.x OOTB. > > Are we supposed to guarantee backward compatibility that old? No. However, it might be good to add an echo task explaining that the JUnit 4

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Jorg, With Ant 1.7.0 all tests pass for me also. It seems that Ant 1.6.5 simply does not yet support JUnit 4.x OOTB. Are we supposed to guarantee backward compatibility that old? Regards, Dim. Dimitri Pourbaix

Re: Nexus for mvn management WAS Re: [LANG][COLLECTIONS] Beta releases

On Mar 30, 2010, at 12:50 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: On Mar 29, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Matt Benson wrote: What was the release process for the sandbox component you and Ralph released? To be precise, Ralph and I had worked with Nexus on separate components, and as those were sandbox componen

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Hi Dimitri, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: > Jorg, > >>> When I was updating SVD, I noticed that parts of the tests were 3.x >>> syntax >>> whereas other 4.x (way easier to use I think). I would advocate for the >>> generalisation of Junit 4.x tests whenever possible. >> >> Well, I think no one is aga

Re: Staging/publishing procedure and tools

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:05 PM, henrib wrote: > > Thanks a lot for this summarized procedure. I was able to upload > JEXL-2.0.1-RC1 using it. > > One important difference with the published procedure is that the only place > where we actually state 'release candidate' status is on the staging sit

Re: Staging/publishing procedure and tools

Thanks a lot for this summarized procedure. I was able to upload JEXL-2.0.1-RC1 using it. One important difference with the published procedure is that the only place where we actually state 'release candidate' status is on the staging site name and the SVN tag. (MATH 2.0 RC3 seems to do this for

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jexl (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jexl has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Jorg, When I was updating SVD, I noticed that parts of the tests were 3.x syntax whereas other 4.x (way easier to use I think). I would advocate for the generalisation of Junit 4.x tests whenever possible. Well, I think no one is against this, unless somebody does the work ;-) However, this i

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Hi Dimitri, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: > Hi, > >> I checked one of the tests and I assume that all of the above are JUnit >> 4.x tests ...? My Ant/lib contains only JUnit 3.8.x. Should JUnit 4.x be >> provided with the build or with Ant? > > When I was updating SVD, I noticed that parts of the tes

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Hi, I checked one of the tests and I assume that all of the above are JUnit 4.x tests ...? My Ant/lib contains only JUnit 3.8.x. Should JUnit 4.x be provided with the build or with Ant? When I was updating SVD, I noticed that parts of the tests were 3.x syntax whereas other 4.x (way easier to

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Hi Phil, Phil Steitz wrote: > Jörg Schaible wrote: [snip] >> Running the source distribution through my compiler zoo. JRockit 1.5 >> fails still >> (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel/109929/focus=109945), >> but we agreed already last time to ignore that. Building with A