Hi Dimitri, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote:
> Jorg, > >>> When I was updating SVD, I noticed that parts of the tests were 3.x >>> syntax >>> whereas other 4.x (way easier to use I think). I would advocate for the >>> generalisation of Junit 4.x tests whenever possible. >> >> Well, I think no one is against this, unless somebody does the work ;-) >> However, this is IMHO no requirement especially now for the release. > > I think it becomes a requirement as soon as it causes failure! If you > think all the 4.x tests fail, we are lacking a requirement to have Junit > 4.x present in the building path. > > By the way, 'ant clean test' successful on my > > Apache Ant version 1.7.0 > > java version "1.6.0_17" > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_17-b04) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.3-b01, mixed mode) > > Junit 3.8.2-1 and 4.3.1-4 With Ant 1.7.0 all tests pass for me also. It seems that Ant 1.6.5 simply does not yet support JUnit 4.x OOTB. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
