Jorg,
When I was updating SVD, I noticed that parts of the tests were 3.x syntax
whereas other 4.x (way easier to use I think). I would advocate for the
generalisation of Junit 4.x tests whenever possible.
Well, I think no one is against this, unless somebody does the work ;-)
However, this is IMHO no requirement especially now for the release.
I think it becomes a requirement as soon as it causes failure! If you
think all the 4.x tests fail, we are lacking a requirement to have Junit
4.x present in the building path.
By the way, 'ant clean test' successful on my
Apache Ant version 1.7.0
java version "1.6.0_17"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_17-b04)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.3-b01, mixed mode)
Junit 3.8.2-1 and 4.3.1-4
Dim.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dimitri Pourbaix *
Institut d'Astronomie et d'Astrophysique * Don't worry, be happy
CP 226, office 2.N4.211, building NO * and CARPE DIEM.
Universite Libre de Bruxelles *
Boulevard du Triomphe * Tel : +32-2-650.35.71
B-1050 Bruxelles * Fax : +32-2-650.42.26
http://sb9.astro.ulb.ac.be/~pourbaix * mailto:pourb...@astro.ulb.ac.be
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
